Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
|
3
|
Eternal Formats / Blue-Based Control / Re: URg StifleStill
|
on: August 06, 2014, 05:28:55 am
|
This deck seems extremely poor vs. Dark Confidant, I think...
Also, the whole Mindbreak Trap discussion was poor and useless. The arguments weren't really arguments, as they are basically just stating the purpose of the card as well as interaction with other cards. Also, if you don't sequence your cards properly, obviously you are going to be blown out by trap.
What argument could you possibly give to support the effectiveness of a card in a metagame other than to state the useful things that it does and how it interacts positively with other commonly played cards? I think you're misunderstanding my point, my point is that if you understand the role Mindbreak Trap has in the context of vintage, the need to list all the functions it holds is not needed... The point should be, however, arguing why it's not good or needed.
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
Eternal Formats / Blue-Based Control / Re: URg StifleStill
|
on: August 04, 2014, 03:17:10 am
|
|
This deck seems extremely poor vs. Dark Confidant, I think...
Also, the whole Mindbreak Trap discussion was poor and useless. The arguments weren't really arguments, as they are basically just stating the purpose of the card as well as interaction with other cards. Also, if you don't sequence your cards properly, obviously you are going to be blown out by trap.
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
Eternal Formats / Blue-Based Control / Re: Dance Magic Dance -- Blue White Fact or Fiction /Spirit of the Labyrinth Control
|
on: June 03, 2014, 03:25:34 am
|
To be quite honest, I think that the UW Vendilion Angels from last year (Restoration angels in place of bomber men) is just a better deck.. However, I haven't tested this deck compared to UW VA.  I don't know who gave it the nickname VA, Craig was calling it Blue Angels when he played it at the NYSE Open. As for one version being better, it's really not a cut and dry X > Y thing, both decks were products of their respective metagames. In a certain environment, having Trinket Mage and its toolbox is very good and in another Spirit of the Labyrinth, Snapcaster and more instants are better. The same goes with Jace TMS vs. Fact or Fiction or any of the other changes. I don't think that there is any deck in Vintage which is "a better deck" than another one without giving at least some consideration to the metagame which is expected. Astute observation Will. It's sad that it needs to be made but it is critical nonetheless. Understanding how and why decks are successful is so much more important than merely noting that they are. I understand that this deck is made, mainly with BUG/Abrupt Decay based creature lists in mind, and that is the reason why he chose to incorporate stuff like 3x StP etc. However, I think Jace is just a better endgame than 4x Fact, and that is based on that, that I called Blue Angels the better deck. In order to consider the different metagames, and how they prey on each other, jace is a house(!) against BUG lists, as they will struggle really hard to beat it, backed up by StP/SCM/Clique/Resto Angel. I honestly think with creatures being as dominant in today's vintage, as they are, StP main is needed. However, FaF is just embarrassing compared to Jace when the opponent plays stuff like flusterstorm. Also, I didn't remember the name Blue Angels, but that is the correct name. I merely called in Vendillion Angels, in order to describe the deck for those familiar with it!  Lastly, I understand why my comment could sound absolute. That wasn't the point. I just cannot comprehend why people would play FaF over Jace. Both are really bad vs. shops, where-as the one shine in BUG M/U's and the other is insane vs other jace-lists. I do understand, however, the argument for playing your entire game in the opponents turns, and that FaF has a clear advantage to Jace there (... Being instant and all!  ), but other than that, FaF is just a dig spell. (I also understand the premise it to be able to play SotL. That's just poor vs Bob, thou, barring that it trades with him.
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
Eternal Formats / Blue-Based Control / Re: UR Delver
|
on: June 02, 2014, 08:08:08 am
|
And fetchlands also thin the library, something that Stephen has pointed out more than once. This deck wants to draw into business all the time, and has gush to work as "the third land" lots of times.
It has been proven, mathematical, several times that "thinning" is highly exaggerated. Flipping with delver, however, is the main reason.
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
Eternal Formats / Blue-Based Control / Re: Grixis Delver
|
on: February 13, 2014, 12:19:36 pm
|
|
I have played a ton of Grixis Delver in legacy and I can tell you this: I always wished Confidant could be gush in that deck. With the amount of permission etc this deck plays, putting 3-4 tokens into play turn 3 is very realistic. Gush let's you that. Dark Confidant.
In Vintage, I'd prefer Confidant over Drain Decks as of right now, but in every other matchup, I feel like Gush is superior.
I would actually suggest finding room for Jitte in the board. Jitte is insane in creature match ups, and really just pushes TNN waaaay over the top.
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
Vintage Community Discussion / General Community Discussion / Re: The Fitness Thread
|
on: February 13, 2014, 06:12:19 am
|
|
I've always been incredible skinny and not-so-strong, but being awesome at running and sprinting.
I took up crossfit a few years (2.5 approximately) ago, and have gained about 10 kg since then (currently weighting about 72 kg... Which is what, 150p?)
I really think that my skill of magic is directly related to my state of health, as I just think about 100x as well when I'm in shape..
My current stats for lifting etc:
52 unbroken pull-ups 135 kg squat (3rm) 187 kg deadlift (2rm) 100 kg benchpress (1rm) 80 kg press, 98 kg jerk (4x4 sets) 110 kg clean (1rm) 75 kg snatch (working on this currently) (1rm)
I don't weightrain outside of crosfitting, so these are my stats based on what I can do in sets/1rm.
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
Eternal Formats / Europe / Re: BoM PARIS - Bazaar of Moxen : 1, 2, 3 november 2013
|
on: November 08, 2013, 02:37:15 am
|
I know for a fact (I was there  , that every single vintage judge was really unsatisfied with how it was ran. The problem was that they had EVERYTHING planned on sunday! BoM 9 3-bye legacy-trial, Modern event, Commander event and Legacy day 2! There was 152 players in vintage and the top 8 was: 1x BUG Fish 3x Forgemaster MUD 1x Sneak and Show (URb Show and tell/Sneak attack) 1x Doomsday 1x Almost Broken I don't remember the 8th person, sorry  I think it was a Jace-deck, but I might be wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
Eternal Formats / Northeast U.S. / Re: Eternal Weekend Coverage
|
on: November 05, 2013, 01:37:40 pm
|
|
This sounds like an insane good event. Really wish this will be the default vintage champs, as I want to play in one of these!
Also, LOL at Gerard vs Stephen at R7! Vault+Key+Clique has to attack for 5 turns (to deal lethal!) That's hilarious!
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
Eternal Formats / Null Rod Based Aggro / Re: Junk Fish: Answers to Everything?
|
on: July 23, 2013, 04:17:43 am
|
I put 56 cards together that were the same as the winning BoM deck and after playing it I just felt like it was ill equipped to win a big 9+ round tourney. It didn't do anything particularly broken and it also didn't have a great clock. Actually the one I put together had 2 Cliques so it actually had a more aggressive tilt.
Wow, I actually had the exact opposite experience. I've been playing it online, as well as in real life, and I find it to be so absurdly powerful - even w/o the brokenness of tinker for BsC and Yawg Will + Key+Vault.
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
Vintage Community Discussion / General Community Discussion / Re: Help europeans get vintage!
|
on: June 15, 2013, 08:23:24 am
|
|
I understand your argument, that a lot will likely abandon vintage champs, if they are european.
However, I cannot help but feel that BoM, if they see there won't be any problems with skipping the vintage event for a tournament of theirs, will be more inclined to do so in the future - considering that modern is really picking up pace, and will draw a lot more players than vintage would.
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
Vintage Community Discussion / General Community Discussion / Help europeans get vintage!
|
on: June 11, 2013, 02:36:22 pm
|
Hi all. If you are not aware, Bazaar of Moxen is having another tournament this november and they are currently having a poll on what the second major event should be. Right now, COMMANDER (I know right!) is leading with about 4 votes, which means there might not be any vintage at all, at this BoM! I am therefore asking you all to help us fellow vintage-players getting BoM to host a vintage tournament. You can vote on www.facebook.com/BazaarOfMoxen (you don't even have to like anything!) Regards, Every single european vintage-player that wants to go to Bazaar of Moxen this November. ps. I am not sure if this is the right place to put this, but I figured it had to be, as it's "general community discussion" 
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
Vintage Community Discussion / General Community Discussion / Re: Sound Off: How many of you will be playing Vintage online?
|
on: May 27, 2013, 07:42:57 am
|
I would love to try Vintage online. In fact that is the only way I can ever experience Vintage, the place where I live doesn't even support any standard or edh play really, plus I have a family so available hours for me are kinda weird (in the middle of a night usually). I posted a question in other thread: http://www.themanadrain.com/index.php?topic=45317.msg625788;boardseen#newI have been picking up the restricted cards (as one-ofs) that have been released online and I own already most of them and use some of them in Commander (or Pauper - Ponder & Lotus Petal) On top of that I have been collecting some of the ABU Duals and Onslaught fetches (mainly as one-ofs to be used in Commander decks) and I own full playsets of Zendikar fetches (picked them all up since they are also Modern legal). Now is it a good way to proceed by acquiring the remaining cards from the restricted list and getting full playsets of ABU Duals and ONS fetches? That is my thought because at least they are useful in Legacy and building up a collection from landbase seems just like a good idea.
Are there some really cheap Vintage staples that I should look out? That is still relevant. Any thoughts are appreciated! Well, Bazaars and Workshops are really cheap online.
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
Vintage Community Discussion / Community Introductions / Re: Introduce Yourself
|
on: May 01, 2013, 06:59:01 am
|
|
Hi all, I'm Anders from Denmark.
Played magic from 96-04, where I quit (and sold my collection, pretty bummed about it now :/)
Picked up magic back in '10 again, with Caw-Blade in standard etc, but I really disliked how magic is played today, in these formats, as I was mainly a combo-player earlier.
I got into vintage, about a year ago, and am trying to find money to purchase the cards again. However, being a student and all, it's hard to find this cash, so it's a slow process.
Really liking the site here, however, and reading about the format really just confirmed that this is where I belong (together with legacy).
|
|
|
|
|