TheManaDrain.com
February 13, 2026, 01:46:55 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
  Home Help Search Calendar Login Register  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1]
1  Vintage Community Discussion / General Community Discussion / Re: Conceding on MTGO on: July 16, 2014, 03:21:41 pm
I always concede as soon as I know I've lost rather than force my opponent to go through the motions. I really appreciate it when my opponent does the same for me, so I always do it for my opponents unless he/she was rude or whatever.

That's a polite attitude to take, but I'm a little less...nice about it. 10 minutes left on the clock in game 1 when you assemble VaultKey? Sorry bub, you gotta put me to zero (or 10 poison, as the case may be).

Is it cynical? Yes. Though, to be fair, if I know the person playing across from me, I'm more likely to just concede.

Your points are valid and well put, but I guess what I dont like about the whole scenario as a whole, is that we could potentially have an online vintage metagame, that has some serious missing pieces of top decks that you might see at Vintage Champs for example (I'm looking at you Bomberman) simply because of the time thing. I would love to try out Bomberman online, but I just dont see, even someone who is very proficient at playing it, will consistently be able to beat the clock. So if you want to use MODO as a playtesting resource for a live tournament, you're missing some valuable pieces.
2  Vintage Community Discussion / General Community Discussion / Re: Conceding on MTGO on: July 16, 2014, 08:44:37 am
I always concede as soon as I know I've lost rather than force my opponent to go through the motions. I really appreciate it when my opponent does the same for me, so I always do it for my opponents unless he/she was rude or whatever.

I wholeheartedly agree here. I feel that MODO should mimick real life and not be so constrained because the timer "is a thing." Although I admit I have no solutions. However, I can say that I played in the Vintage daily last night and lost to MUD because he made me go through the motions with I had vault/key combo and waited it out as I had to attack three times with Griselbrand. He won game 2 and I had him dead on board again for game 3 but ran out of time. The "timer is a thing" but the better deck would have won in real life, end of story.
3  Eternal Formats / Midwest U.S. / Re: Team Serious Open Vintage - Columbus - April 12 on: April 09, 2014, 09:35:48 am
I'll be there coming from Indianapolis.
Pages: [1]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.031 seconds with 17 queries.