Last week I read the article "Insider Trading - Are Proxies Hurting Vintage Tournament Attendance?," and then having read this article on the current state of the metagame and should we restrict mana drain I had a thought.
The thought was "Is the metagame different for a non-proxied vs a proxied environment?" and an associated thought with that "On which environment should we base the banned and restricted list?".
It seems to me that restricting or even banning a card like Mishra's Workshop in a proxied enviornment is not the same as doing the same in a non-proxied environment finanically but should have a similar effect on both metagames.
If players are only playing full powered or staks with Workshop and Bazaars because its a proxied environment doesn't that sufficiently change the nature of that metagame from a non-proxied environment?
I certainly don't have the data or the time to answer these questions. I'm not even sure how relevant or real they are.
As player with full power, a set of mana drains, 3 grim tutors, a time vault, 1 bazaar and a library in a pear tree I for one would not be happy with banning or restrictions being done a) based on a proxied environment and b) possibly by people playing in said environment.
Not angry or annoyed just had a thought that's all.
Happy vintage playing.
