TheManaDrain.com
April 06, 2026, 01:25:06 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
  Home Help Search Calendar Login Register  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2
1  Eternal Formats / General Strategy Discussion / Re: Swan Song (???) on: September 10, 2013, 05:41:41 am
This is the first Theros card that looks vintage playable.  Good casting cost, pitchable to force, hard counters instants, manageable drawback.  I think this will find a home, probably in Oath.
2  Vintage Community Discussion / General Community Discussion / Re: Power in Revised? Dual Lands in Fourth Edition? on: January 14, 2013, 08:57:33 pm
If CE were legal, it would likely increase interest in Vintage.  This is a good thing for all Magic sales.  Right now, CE is only good for collecting and for the occasional ass who tries to pass them off as "real." 

Really no reason not to make CE legal... so long as you are using cases that mask the corners (something that already is standard in Vintage).
3  Eternal Formats / General Strategy Discussion / Re: Grand Abolisher on: July 03, 2011, 07:38:26 am
I want this in Bomberman.  Badly.
I second that!  Very Happy

I want this to cost 1W... badly...
4  Eternal Formats / Creative / Re: Hermit Druid with Green Sun's Zenith- viable? on: February 16, 2011, 10:26:37 pm
Ponder is usually my victim of cut decisions. Personally, I hate MisD, but I see the need for it. Other than that the only thing you could stand to lose for the 4th preordain is the 3rd cabal Therapy, which ups the blue count. 3 seize, 2 therapy and 5 pitch spells should be good enough, right?

What about dropping a thoughtseize and keeping the therapy?
5  Eternal Formats / Eternal Article Discussion / Re: The Early Days of Vintage on: November 21, 2010, 10:29:33 am
It is funny to think about the decks my friends and I put together in the beginning.  I started playing in early revised and played through visions.  I stopped playing until timespiral and have been on and off ever since.  The "bombs" in most of the decks that we played were Royal Assassin, Sorceress Queen, Hypnotic Specter, Mana Drain / Counter Spell, Control Magic, and a few Mahamoti Djinn to beat down in the late game.  Other people played stompy style red green or weeny whit.  One great deck was an artifact deck with Atog for the kill. 

The author's sentiment about Juzam Djinn reflects the way that we felt about most creatures with a drawback.   Although Juzam saw a lot of play were we where, almost no other creature with a potential drawback did.  We could only see the bad and never the good.

Great article.  Brought back all kinds of memories.
6  Vintage Community Discussion / General Community Discussion / Re: Whats more useful? on: July 26, 2010, 05:58:08 pm
I'm saying this because Power has been essentially the same price since around 2007 while Workshops have fluctuated.  Also, I won't falsely claim to be an expert on card distribution or the like but it seems reasonable to assume that there are less Antiquities cards floating around than Unlimited cards.  The main point is that Power prices have remained stable for 3ish years while Workshop prices have not.
By the same token, their value is also more likely to drop. At a blind guess, I'd assume now is a bad time to buy Shops, thanks to MUD probably driving up demand.

Also less demand for shops.  More archtypes run power than run shops. 
7  Eternal Formats / Null Rod Based Aggro / Re: [Deck Primer]: Christmas Beatings on: July 25, 2010, 10:56:07 pm
Just wondering, but if in a high MUD environment, isn't artifact mutation better than seal of primodium?  Not only does it kill the artifacts, but gives you tokens for roadblocks against a Lodestone, or just to tap and swing ftw.
Seal can be cast proactively, which is significant. Artifact Mutuation will never hit a Sphere/Golem without making you pay extra for it. I agree that Mutation was the nuts against Stax back in the day, and might still be. Just pointing out a key reason why Seal is desirable.

If people wanted spell based removal, I also think Naturalize would be run before Mutation, since it hits Oath.

Seal is also a nice and easy way to get an enchantment into the yard.  Good for the 'goyf.
8  Eternal Formats / Null Rod Based Aggro / Re: [Deck Primer]: Christmas Beatings on: July 21, 2010, 10:11:05 am
4 Seals is for sure correct.  "Nature's Claim" still bothers me.  Both of you probably have more experience than I do with the deck, so I will test it.  I appreciate that you are all sharing the knowledge and keeping the deck evolving.

9  Eternal Formats / Null Rod Based Aggro / Re: [Deck Primer]: Christmas Beatings on: July 21, 2010, 10:03:34 am
For anyone who is interested, here is a list I'm running right now:

4 Tarmogoyf
4 Null Rod
4 Pyroblast
4 Magus of the Moon
4 Seal of Primordium
4 Nature's Claim
4 Mogg Fanatic
4 Burning-Tree Shaman
4 Elvish Spirit Guide
4 Simian Spirit Guide
4 Wooded Foothills
2 Taiga
4 Forest
4 Mountain
4 Wasteland
1 Strip Mine
1 Black Lotus

Sideboard:
1 Blood Moon
3 Red Elemental Blast
3 Ancient Grudge
4 Pithing Needle
2 Tormod's Crypt
2 Ravenous Trap

I'm open to suggestions, questions, and feedback. I don't think Autumn's Veil has a place in the deck right now, unless your local metagame has a big blue/black bias. And for the sake of this deck I hope they print some broken red or green spell(s) in Scars of Mirrodin, or at least in the Scars block.

-Ryan


Move 2 "Red Elemental Blasts" from sideboard to main and move 2 "Pyroblast" from main to sideboard.

I think that would be a wrong more.  Goyf is the only real beater in Christmas Beatings.  He needs to be as big as possible.  You can cast Pyroblast on a land to grow Goyf.  This is important, especially in attacking a blocking scenarios and against Dredge where Pyroblast has no real use Game 1.  I'm not that worried about Meddling Mage, which is the only reason to play a mix of Red Blasts.  Having Pyroblasts in the main gives you a lot more flexibility.  Red Blasts are more likely to be dead cards.

Meddling is a big reason, but not the only.  Extirpate and Cabal Therapy also have limited splash in some (not first tier) blue control decks. 

I have found that, by the time I am dropping a 'goyf, there are usually instants already in the graveyard.

I think that it is a balancing test.  To me the balance weighed in favor of the mix.  If you are running into situations where there are no instants in the graveyards, I agree that pyroblast is the better card and would outweigh the benefits of diversity.
10  Eternal Formats / Null Rod Based Aggro / Re: [Deck Primer]: Christmas Beatings on: July 20, 2010, 08:45:48 am
For anyone who is interested, here is a list I'm running right now:

4 Tarmogoyf
4 Null Rod
4 Pyroblast
4 Magus of the Moon
4 Seal of Primordium
4 Nature's Claim
4 Mogg Fanatic
4 Burning-Tree Shaman
4 Elvish Spirit Guide
4 Simian Spirit Guide
4 Wooded Foothills
2 Taiga
4 Forest
4 Mountain
4 Wasteland
1 Strip Mine
1 Black Lotus

Sideboard:
1 Blood Moon
3 Red Elemental Blast
3 Ancient Grudge
4 Pithing Needle
2 Tormod's Crypt
2 Ravenous Trap

I'm open to suggestions, questions, and feedback. I don't think Autumn's Veil has a place in the deck right now, unless your local metagame has a big blue/black bias. And for the sake of this deck I hope they print some broken red or green spell(s) in Scars of Mirrodin, or at least in the Scars block.

-Ryan


Move 2 "Red Elemental Blasts" from sideboard to main and move 2 "Pyroblast" from main to sideboard.

Burning-Tree Shaman is nice tech.  I would consider him as a 2 of main deck and also run 2 Stingscourger main.  They are both good for very different situations.  You can put the other 2 Burning-Tree Shaman in sideboard and swap them if you face Vault-Key.

Just my $.02

Also, I personally prefer "Tin Street Hooligan" to  "Nature's Claim".

11  Eternal Formats / Null Rod Based Aggro / Re: [Deck Primer]: Christmas Beatings on: July 17, 2010, 09:41:33 pm
Heya,

From M11:

Manic Vandal

Autumn's Vale

May both be worth considering for a space.

Manic Vandal is probably worse in this deck than Tin Street Hooligan.  The Hooligan costs one less, can be cast so it doesn't have to destroy an artifact if you're the only one with something in play at the time, and has the same amount of power (toughness almost never matters).  I wouldn't play him.

Autumn's Vale is interesting.  Red Blasts can blow up blue permanents like Jace and Tez which is important, so I'd give them the nod at first glance.  The thing that Autumn's Veil can do is protect your spells for an entire turn for just one green mana.  It's a decent surprise card that can let you trap your opponent if he over extends with bounce and/or counterspells.  I've played with Vexing Shusher in the deck and liked his ability a lot.  If I had to choose between Veil and Shusher, I'd probably stick with Shusher.  This deck can have trouble dealing 20 damage during the course of the game.  Shusher can help out in that regard while Veil cannot.  Veil is a one time use.  Shusher can be used every turn and changes the dynamic of the game.

All in all, I don't think M11 had much for this deck.  Until they print red or green cards that make players sacrifice artifacts and enchantments, Christmas Beatings is still in limbo.  Thanks for the input, though.  I'm always on the lookout for new cards for this deck.

Peace,

-Troy

I read your posts completely and I agree with everything you said.  I am still looking into testing Autumn's Vale a little.  Will have to see the results.  I love to be able to pitch an Elvish Spirit Guide for that effect.  Pseudo "Force of Will".
12  Eternal Formats / Null Rod Based Aggro / Re: [Deck Primer]: Christmas Beatings on: July 14, 2010, 07:15:38 am
From M11:

Manic Vandal

Autumn's Vale

May both be worth considering for a space.
13  Eternal Formats / Eternal Article Discussion / Re: [Premium Article] Eldrazi in Eternal: A Vintage Set Review on: April 20, 2010, 07:15:41 am
"See Beyond" may see some play, but I do not think that it will be the powerhouse that is predicted here...

IMHO Impulse is strictly better.

1U for a sorcerywith that effect... just does not do it for me.

Looks like we wait for the next set to see if Vintage gets a boost.
14  Eternal Formats / General Strategy Discussion / Re: RoE in vintage on: April 09, 2010, 08:00:07 pm
New Duress = maybe some play.

None of the other stuff that has been spoiled (yet).
15  Eternal Formats / General Strategy Discussion / Re: Bruizar's All Seeing Eye looks at Rise of the Eldrazi on: April 05, 2010, 09:04:11 am

Student of Warfare
This card is going to cost some money. This creature is really good. A great 1 mana drop, but its also a great 2 mana drop, or 3 mana drop, basically this card allows you to tap out whenever you want to cast it, so there is not a 'right' moment to play this card. 3/3 first strike is good, 4/4 double strike wins games. I expect to see this at least in standard / extended. In hindsight, Figure of Destiny seems like a future sighted version of this card and I actually like this card better because this has some built in protection in the form of first strike. Figure of Destiny doesn't get protection up until 'level 4', where you invested  11 mana in him. This one gets protection starting from 2 mana. Also, Figure of Destiny costs 2 mana for 2/2, and 5 mana for 4/4. Student is 3/3 first strike for 2 and 4/4 doublestrike for 8. For that reason ,equipment is better on Student then it is on Figure. The only thing to say for figure is that its 4/4 comes quicker putting it out of bolt range.


I am not completely up on the "level" mechanic.  But my understanding was that creatures come into play as a level 0.  Thus it would cost WWW for a 3/3/ first strike with "Student of Warfare".  Do they actually come in as a level 1?  If so, I agree, the card is very solid.  Not vintage, but still solid.
16  Eternal Formats / General Strategy Discussion / Re: Realms Uncharted on: March 30, 2010, 03:39:31 pm
I don't think that this has a place in vintage right now... but it my in the future be very strong.  Only time will tell.
17  Eternal Formats / General Strategy Discussion / Re: Realms Uncharted on: March 28, 2010, 10:29:30 am
I don't know if it is "broken"... but it has a very powerful and versatile effect.  Depending on the lands that are printed in future sets, it has the possibility of becoming broken at some point.  Also, I agree that is will see play in legacy in 43 land and possibly a few others.
18  Eternal Formats / Eternal Article Discussion / Re: [Free Article]Fuel to the Fire: My Thoughts on the P9 & the Reserve List on: March 23, 2010, 03:30:05 pm
Here's another idea: make Collector's Edition tournament legal.  Since they're already out there, Wizards could essentially release a manageable amount of Power and duals into circulation without actually printing anything.  The CE cards are already valuable and rare.  Obviously, they'd have to be played in opaque-backed sleeves, but so does Alpha.  And there's precedent for making a non-tournament set legal in Portal.  And the cards themselves are freaking beautiful....

The Meandeck Open has allowed this for some time, and Menendian has spoken in favor of it. We allow CE at our local store to count as non-proxy. Never had an issue with it whatsoever. Just don't run white sleaves Wink

Since the majority of Vintage tournaments are not sanctioned anyway, so long as there was a general consensus that CE and IE do not count toward proxy limit, doesn't that make them "tournament legal" for all intents and purposes anyway? 

Just throwing it out there.  Wish the DCI would just hop on board and make them legal. 

19  Eternal Formats / Eternal Article Discussion / Re: [Free Article]Fuel to the Fire: My Thoughts on the P9 & the Reserve List on: March 22, 2010, 03:14:26 pm
I like the proposition of Smmenen...

Allow anyone to use CE or IE.  That way you have expanded the amount of power available, duals available, etc.  You have increased the card pool.  But you did not shake confidence in the value of the cards (as much) because you have not sent a message that these types of cards are at risk of being reprinted and destroying an investment.
20  Eternal Formats / Eternal Article Discussion / Re: [Free Article]Fuel to the Fire: My Thoughts on the P9 & the Reserve List on: March 18, 2010, 10:23:08 pm
Even if the price does drop, the drop would be so small for Alpha and Beta power that only those holding Unlimited power would be greatly influenced (because the new substitute would only substitute for the reprint...not the collectors item-the black border).  A new template copy of Power that is unplayable in all formats except the most niche format in existence would not change the value of the original.  It would not create more copies of the original.  The value added for playability is low.  Beta Power is iconic.  Power is a collector's item.  Alpha power may as well be a comic book in terms of its game-play abilities and the value is still greater than gold per oz.   That is why the price is inelastic.  The people who want a collector's piece of power will still pay high dollar for the limited copies regardless of the fact that a new $10 copy (that I just created for argument) exists.

You can find a beat version of sol ring, or a washing machine lotus for a fraction of the value of the nicer ones.  The fact that it still taps for mana does not matter to the majority of collectors (who are the people shelling out the cash).

The reason why your statement was a gross misinterpretation of supply and demand is because it is an oversimplification.

I personally believe that the curve on lowering the price of the originals by printing additional copies is drastically tapering off.  If anything, copies would raise the interest in the format, which would cause the play value to rise (possibly offsetting any loss incurred).  Also, if the cards were printed in a way that effected standard or extended, the market for the originals would grow...demand would shift, and the older copies would rise in value.

Finally:  How much would the Alpha & Beta copies be worth if no Unlimited & Revised copies existed?  More.  Obviously.  But since these reprints already exist, and because of the other factors I have discussed, a new printing of less desirable copies would not have the dramatic effect on Alpha and Beta copies that many would have us believe.

Oddly enough, during the Mirrodin period (when we saw some of the highest inflation in high-dollar card prices since the game's inception)- proxies were rampant in most Vintage tournaments...these are also substitutes.

So, in your opinion, an "oversimplification" is a "gross misinterpretation"?  Even though all of the underlying premises are, by your admission, true.  I also note that you support your belief by unsubstantiated beliefs that reprinting would raise interest in eternal formats? 

I assume that you are aware that reprinting some of the staples may or may not increase interest in vintage.  Regardless, the amount of increase is unknown. 

I did not state that reprinting some of the staples would make the bottom drop out of vintage cards, just that it would reduce their values.  Which, unless all of the most basic tenants of the law of supply and demand are incorrect, it would. 

21  Eternal Formats / Eternal Article Discussion / Re: [Free Article]Fuel to the Fire: My Thoughts on the P9 & the Reserve List on: March 16, 2010, 09:07:03 pm
I don't understand the concept of "more cards=lower values" beta is worth more than alpha, theres twice as much beta as alpha. New power will probably be worth more and drive prices of the old stuff up. Great read, I should follow your blog more closely.

Disagree.  Basic supply and demand.  More cards would undoubtedly drive prices down.  No two ways about it.  It may be offset to some small degree by increased interest in vintage, but I think that is doubtful at best.  Take "Sol Ring" as an example.  Card sees lots of play.  If it was Alpha, Beta, Unlimited only, the card would be worth quite a bit.  Look at it's value.  Because of all of the re-prints, it is not too expensive.   Beta is like $75 and unlimted is $15-20.    Just my $.02

This is a gross misinterpretation of the law of supply and demand: a reprint is not an equivalent of the original.  They are on a completely different demand curve.  Sure, it is a substitute, which would tend to bring down the price of the original- but only to the extent that the play function drives the price.  Does a PSA grade 9 lotus cost the same as an unlimited one?  Does the fact that an unlimited copy exists lower the value of that beta copy?   No.   For collectibles, the subsitutes makes less of a difference because the beta power curve is very inelastic (it's like crack rocks-it could be a million dollars and junkies would still purchase it) becuase an adequate substitute does not exist.

Price is always influenced down by increased supply regardless of elasticity.  Elasticity does influence the degree price will be influenced, but I fail to see how my statement is "a gross misinterpretation of the law of supply and demand".
22  Eternal Formats / Eternal Article Discussion / Re: [Free Article] Vintage: Gateway Decks on: March 15, 2010, 04:53:21 pm
The really expensive ones are sets of
Goblin Welder
Metalworker
Tangle Wire
Smokestack
which runs around 30-40 per set.

I think Goblin Welder has fallen significantly in price.  You can pick up a set for around $22-$26 bucks now.  I agree about all of the others.
23  Eternal Formats / Eternal Article Discussion / Re: [Free Article]Fuel to the Fire: My Thoughts on the P9 & the Reserve List on: March 15, 2010, 06:42:14 am
I don't understand the concept of "more cards=lower values" beta is worth more than alpha, theres twice as much beta as alpha. New power will probably be worth more and drive prices of the old stuff up. Great read, I should follow your blog more closely.

Disagree.  Basic supply and demand.  More cards would undoubtedly drive prices down.  No two ways about it.  It may be offset to some small degree by increased interest in vintage, but I think that is doubtful at best.  Take "Sol Ring" as an example.  Card sees lots of play.  If it was Alpha, Beta, Unlimited only, the card would be worth quite a bit.  Look at it's value.  Because of all of the re-prints, it is not too expensive.   Beta is like $75 and unlimted is $15-20.    Just my $.02
24  Eternal Formats / Miscellaneous / Re: Win conditions in mana drain decks on: November 09, 2008, 10:04:06 am
I'd like to also point out that Tezz + moxen are a win condition also

How?
25  Eternal Formats / Miscellaneous / Re: [Premium Article] So Many Insane Plays - Vintage Championship Report: 1st Pl on: August 24, 2007, 10:43:23 am
Congrats Smennen.  Always enjoy reading your stuff.  Just read about you on wazards.com http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=mtgcom/daily/af185.  Safe to say we are all happy for you. 

I personally don't like the idea of unrestricting fact or fiction, but that is only because I have has some bad experiences playing against it.  And because it raped my mother and killed my father.
26  Eternal Formats / Miscellaneous / Re: [Premium Article] The Mean Deck Solution to the Vintage Metagame on: June 17, 2007, 09:15:13 am
Merchant Scroll has been popular in T1 since at least 1996.  Its popularity has waxed and wained, and you may have discovered it for yourself two years ago, but the card has seen considerable play since its printing.

http://www.trollandtoad.com/p135650.html

Could not find the decklist, but three copies were used in a deck listed in the above cited "guide".
27  Eternal Formats / Miscellaneous / Re: [Deck Discussion] 4-Gush GroATog on: June 16, 2007, 08:52:15 am
So... uif Duress is THE weapon against Flash and most of the other Upper Tier decs, then why don't try the (Mana drain)/ Mind Twist way. The whole bunch of artifact mana + a few Mana Drains and the raw power of Mind Twist can Randomly win games. But if a Flash player is forced to discard Tutors/Combo or Protection your own win is not far away. Even if it is only 2-3 cards.


2-3 random cards = 3-4 mana.  It countered, you spent 2+B-3+B to draw the counter rather than just B to duress it.  Duress can go off first turn without acceleration, and does not rely on you first establishing UU to counter some spell prior to it's effective use.
28  Eternal Formats / Miscellaneous / Re: 1-Land Belcher on: June 08, 2007, 11:53:15 am
This deck seems like it will be really good in todays meta.  It stomps Ichorid and can take game one from most other decks unless they have FoW in hand and even then potentially through your own PoN.  I prefer a list w/out EtW.  Even though EtW provides potential "slow wins", I do not feel that it it worth the decreased frequency of the "fast wins". 
29  Eternal Formats / Miscellaneous / Re: Best Extirpate Target vs. Ichorid on: June 04, 2007, 09:54:45 pm
The best way to beat Ichorid is run two different forms of hate, so they have to board in two different kinds of removal. For example, playing Yixlid Jailer (a creature) and Leyline of the Void (an enchantment) will force your opponent to board in both Emerald Charms, and Contagion. This will cause them to board out a large quantity of their deck, furthermore causing them to essentially cripple their own deck.

I have brought in Leyline game two, when my opponent has been in the position where they simply want to see what I bring in, and then game three, when they bring in full forces of enchantment removal (Emerald Charm, Reverent Silence), I have then brought in Yixlid Jailer to their surprise, which they have not at all prepared for.

This however forces you to dedicate more slots to this matchup, but will of course improve the probability of you winning. I have faced the technique before, and I myself can easily say that it was the overall most-effective.

The entire question of this thread does not seem necessary to me, because using Extirpate to fight Ichorid will rarely work in your favor, because you are much better off playing one of the many other forms of hate mentioned before.

I run leyline maindeck because I believe it to be generally disruptive to many different decks reliant upon or aided by their graveyards.  I was just curious to see whether people believed that extirpate (even as a one-of) was efficient at shutting down or substantially crippling the ichorid plan.  The general sentiment seems to be that ichorid can play through a single extirpate.  I appreciate all of the advice, it has been really helpful.  I think that I am going to go with the jailers main as well in lieu of the extirpates not only for their effectiveness against ichorid but because of the redundancy or hating the 'yard.  Thanks again.
30  Eternal Formats / Miscellaneous / Best Extirpate Target vs. Ichorid on: June 04, 2007, 11:19:00 am
I know that Ichorid currently has many different builds floating around and that Extirpate, while still regarded has a quality card, has lost much of the initial hype that it had previously garnered as a "format breaking" card.  However, several targets in the ichorid build seem to be quite vulnerable to a well placed and timed extirpate which significantly cripples and slows down the deck.  What is the best card to hit (assuming all are in the yard and therefore susceptible?  Dread Return? Or, should the the Bridge From Below go first?  Any other targets that have a similar impact?
Pages: [1] 2
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.055 seconds with 19 queries.