It seems to me that the discussion is starting to go around in circles. People who have power understandably have a hard time accepting proxies. They spent the time/money to get power in the first place, and there seems to be a bit of expectation that others do the same. I understand this point of view, I am powered, and I NEVER proxy anything in any format. However, I have seen non-powered friends attempt a foray at Vintage and it could not have happened without the use of proxies (though the current meta seems to allow for some successful budget decks).
So the basic argument comes down to the haves and the have-nots (in a very generalized overview). The schism between the two groups is part of the problem. No one can say what Wizards will do (though reprinting power nine seems unlikely), but as long as the Vintage community seems splintered as such, the people in power will likely consider treating us the way they always have.
And as we continue to discuss, some people need to remember that the article was the affect on the Vintage Tournament Attendance, not the affect on the secondary market value of their Power Nine. Truth be told if a Black Lotus was $50, more people might be inclined to attempt Vintage.
@ allowing Collector's Edition to be tournament legal, this won't happen because there is too much room for cheating with the corners being different.
Just my two cents.
