Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3
|
|
10
|
Vintage Community Discussion / General Community Discussion / Re: DCI Ban: Paul Mastriano?
|
on: February 01, 2015, 12:21:18 am
|
You know, I see a lot of people on here piling on, and yet I have not seen one example of any actual evidence proving this "conclusive point" so many of you seem to have about the guy. All I see and have been hearing from others is nothing more than speculation. The only people who "know" anything for sure are Paul himself, and the DCI.
I've been back playing MTG for a few years now, and pretty much only play Vintage here in the Northeast. And during this time, I've been told about several players that were "definitely cheaters", just like Paul. Here's a list of those that I've been told by multiple sources are shady cheaters:
1. Josh Potucek 2. Justin Kohler 3. Matt Murray 4. Brian Kelly 5. Tom Dixon
You notice something consistent in that list? ALL of them are consistent Top 8'ers, just like Paul is. In fact, outside of a handful of others like Rob Edwards, Shawn Griffiths, Joel Lim, and Keith Seals, these 5 guys make deep tournament runs very often here in the Northeast. I've heard many times from many people that Mark Hornung and Allen Fullmer, back when they were playing and winning often, were cheaters. It seems pretty unlikely to me that in a community this small there are so many of it's top players that are shady.
I've personally played against Paul, and each and every person I listed above numerous times throughout these last several years in tournaments. Not once have I ever seen any kind of "shady-ness" from ANY of them during the MANY times I've faced all of them. Not once have I ever even heard of a definitive example of one of those guys trying to blatantly cheat during a match. All I've ever heard was a lot of speculation, with no good evidence ever offered up as to why these guys are "shady players."
Now I'm not naive. I know damn well that Paul or any of these guys could, in fact, be former or even active cheaters. But I also know that any of you could be the exact same thing! So before you all start lighting up your torches and getting your pitchforks sharpened any further, how's about you offer up some REAL evidence to these claims so many of you so definitively have before you all go forming your lynch mob. Players make mistakes during games. Players make lots of play errors during tournaments. Especially in Vintage. It's a fast-paced format. I'm willing to bet each and every one of you has effed-up often during your individual tournaments. I'm willing to bet each and every one of you has ROYALLY effed-up as well and simply had the good fortune of not getting caught on it by your opponent as well. To call someone a cheater or shady is to say with certainty that that person is deliberately and maliciously trying to gain an unnatural advantage over their opponents. Not one of you has provided any evidence to prove that in Paul's case. Not one person who's told me about the other players that they considered shady has ever provided that either.
If you want more detailed, personal accounts pm me. Also the reason that he was able to get away with it for so long was because he is a nice guy, most of the best cheaters are, thats tactic #1 also as far as the people on your list, i have never heard or seen anything of any of them acting in a shady way, the ones i know, anyway. This is not a witch hunt, this has been years in the making for 1 person.
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
Vintage Community Discussion / General Community Discussion / Re: DCI Ban: Paul Mastriano?
|
on: January 31, 2015, 06:25:03 pm
|
I know if i ever have to play against him again i will request a judge sit with us the whole timhe, shuffle his deck for him and deal him his cards
And that request would be denied. It may, but at the very least it would bring attention to the fact that he has been a cancer on the vintage community for many years, preying on the good nature.and kind heartedness of all of us, but then again most of us know or have known this for a while now, so at the very least all if the vintage to's i know would have him under scrutiny every time he showed up.
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
Eternal Formats / Ritual-Based Combo / Re: TPS players
|
on: January 20, 2014, 11:11:00 am
|
|
It was a lot like Reid dukes list...lol it seems bad but I just keep winning with it, I only started playing it to prove to myself it was bad..but that hasn't worked out yet.
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
Eternal Formats / Ritual-Based Combo / Re: TPS players
|
on: January 15, 2014, 07:29:19 am
|
|
I have not played forces for a while..the shops match up is.never great, but in my experience having more business spells to capitalize on any weakness or opening they give you ( and they usually do) is.better than 2 for 1ing any one of the many 4 its they have in the deck.
|
|
|
|
|