TheManaDrain.com
October 11, 2025, 05:09:18 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Single Card Discussion: Grimclaw Bats  (Read 3132 times)
Ephraim
Adepts
Basic User
****
Posts: 2938


The Casual Adept

LordZakath
View Profile
« on: January 26, 2004, 08:51:58 pm »

Grimclaw Bats
{1}{B} - Creature - Bat
1/1
Flying
{B}, Pay 1 Life: Grimclaw Bats gets +1/+1 until end of turn.


Okay, paying life is bad, but this card seems like it might be a poor man's Nantuko Shade. It has one less power to start, but it has flying. Will Suicide Black have any use for this, or are its drawbacks just too severe to make it playable?
Logged

Did you know that Red is the color or art and music and passion? Combine that with Green, the color of nature, spiritualism, and community and you get a hippie commune of drum circles, dreamcatchers, and recreational drug use. Let's see that win a Pro Tour.
Malus
Basic User
**
Posts: 12


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: January 26, 2004, 09:26:56 pm »

If the cost was just one mana or one life, then it would be pretty good.  As it stands, it just isn't as good as the shade.
Logged
brendan
Basic User
**
Posts: 187


1516701
View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: January 26, 2004, 09:52:13 pm »

Quote from: Malus
If the cost was just one mana or one life, then it would be pretty good.  As it stands, it just isn't as good as the shade.


If the cost was just one life then it would be broken. You would suddenly see a *lot* more spot removal in main decks to combat the suicide black combo kill. Wink
Logged
TheFram
Full Members
Basic User
***
Posts: 179


thefram1
View Profile
« Reply #3 on: January 26, 2004, 10:05:15 pm »

If someone isn't willing/able to get shades then they should not be attempting to play Mono Black Aggro competetively.

Shades are not t2 legal, see 0 extended play, and are recent enough to be in heavy circulation. I see no reason for a substitute for a readily available card.
Logged
urza_insane
Basic User
**
Posts: 205


urzainsane
View Profile
« Reply #4 on: January 26, 2004, 10:27:25 pm »

Contradictory to what people are saying, you can play Sui without shades! Not everybody has money and I can see why Shades might be hard to get. Budget Forever!!!

One card that would probably serve you better is Slith Bloodletter. Same cost and it regenerates! I love em in super budget sui. Good luck!
Logged

Team Predict: We're amazing maybe!!

"For the first time in his life, Grakk felt a little warm and fuzzy inside."
Sytupal
Basic User
**
Posts: 138


zXRaiNeyXz
View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: January 27, 2004, 01:56:16 am »

You can get them at less than 10 dollars trade value! ....    I agree with The Fram that Shades are not something to Budget competitively.
Logged

Signature, Smignature, Isn't this where people should write there name illegibly?

Team CCC.

Minsc And Boo And You!.
Kowal
My name is not Brian.
Adepts
Basic User
****
Posts: 2497


Reanimate your feet!


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: January 27, 2004, 02:21:49 am »

Too budget for Nantuko Shades? Rolling Eyes
Mow a lawn, dude.
Logged
Ephraim
Adepts
Basic User
****
Posts: 2938


The Casual Adept

LordZakath
View Profile
« Reply #7 on: January 27, 2004, 02:44:07 am »

So an auction for 4 Nantuko shades, ending in more than 4 days, is under $10.00. Big deal. One ending in 17 hours is nearly at $23.00. With shipping and handling, we'll say $24.00. I can justify spending $6.00 on a lot of things, but certainly not on a single Magic card.

As for your 'mow a lawn' comment, stuff it. I work full time at a good job, but that money's going to pay for tuition and for a car - things I'm going to need. I have little disposable income to devote to leisure activities and not all of it is for Magic. So yes, I am "too budget" for Nantuko Shades. Now, get the hell off my case.
Logged

Did you know that Red is the color or art and music and passion? Combine that with Green, the color of nature, spiritualism, and community and you get a hippie commune of drum circles, dreamcatchers, and recreational drug use. Let's see that win a Pro Tour.
Kowal
My name is not Brian.
Adepts
Basic User
****
Posts: 2497


Reanimate your feet!


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: January 27, 2004, 02:47:00 am »

If you want to play decks so beyond the terms of budget that you're casual than default, I'm totally cool with that and won't think better of myself than you because of that.  But don't try to tell me you're being competitive, because you're not.  That's why budgetizing is ineffective:  there's no 'budget' format, especially for a world where Nantuko Shade is out of your reach, and restricting yourself access to the optimal cards isn't going to make you competitive.
Logged
defector
Basic User
**
Posts: 290


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: February 07, 2004, 04:50:31 pm »

As hard core e-bayer, let me give some advice to the budget player.  Don't look at four of's.  Many people in the market are netdecking and impatient.  Four of's complete decks, so they are heavily competed for.  Snipe one of's and wait four weeks instead, you can easliy get shades for 4-6 a piece if you are patient and buy them one at a time.  This logic holds true even for many restricted cards(my research has shown me that 75% at least of the restricted list is available in the six dollar or under e-bay market), you know the obvious exceptions to that rule. Smile  Budget play is fine, about all I do, but there's no need to make it more limiting that it already is.  The key is timing and patience.
good luck
defector
Logged

I play fair symmetrical cards.
Tha Gunslinga
Full Members
Basic User
***
Posts: 1583


De-Errata Mystical Tutor!

ThaGunslingaMOTL
View Profile Email
« Reply #10 on: February 09, 2004, 01:22:14 am »

Quote from: defector
my research has shown me that 75% at least of the restricted list is available in the six dollar or under e-bay market)


Restricted cards above $6

Mana Crypt
P10
Chrome Mox
Mox Diamond
Tolarian Academy
Fork
Vampiric Tutor

That's 16 cards over $6.  Are there 64 or more cards that are Restricted in T1?


If you want cheap Shades, just find a T2 player who played MBC and doesn't need his/hers.  Or just buy them.  I mean, Sui needs Sinkholes, which are much more expensive than Shades, and even Negator is almost as much as Shade.
Logged

Don't tolerate splittin'
thejinhong
Basic User
**
Posts: 42



View Profile Email
« Reply #11 on: February 09, 2004, 02:53:27 am »

If you can't afford shades, then you probably can't afford sinkholes.  Hell, Negator and wastelands aren't too cheap anymore either if you think about.  

Honestly, if you're not willing/can't afford to get shades or sinks, then you might not be able to build a good version of this deck.
Logged

King of Collector's Edition,

Can't stop, addicted to the shindig
DEA
Basic User
**
Posts: 384



View Profile
« Reply #12 on: February 09, 2004, 04:34:55 am »

54 cards on the restricted list currently  Very Happy
Logged

i need red mana
defector
Basic User
**
Posts: 290


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: February 10, 2004, 08:06:21 pm »

Well without adjusting for inflation or euro vs dollar, and adding yawg will to the over 6 dollar list that gives us 17/54 or 68.52% in the 6 and under.  I'd do more math, but i'm at work.  Regardless, that a lot of the list in the grasp of budget players.  6 is also low, I don't blink until 25 dollars myself Smile, it's only one copy u need after all.
I'll do some more math if I have time
defector
Logged

I play fair symmetrical cards.
Jacob Orlove
Official Time Traveller of TMD
Administrator
Basic User
*****
Posts: 8074


When am I?


View Profile Email
« Reply #14 on: February 10, 2004, 08:16:54 pm »

This is horribly off-topic and not productive at all. Closed.
Logged

Team Meandeck: O Lord,
Guard my tongue from evil and my lips from speaking guile.
To those who slander me, let me give no heed.
May my soul be humble and forgiving to all.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.06 seconds with 21 queries.