To add to this, I beat this with Trinistax. Why didn't you post losing logs of that? Or stress the weaknesses of this deck as much as the strengths? A realistic poster is much more believable, and will get more people to play this deck than what you have currently done.
Apparently you neglected to read the entire forum, and skipped over many of the bits where I have indeed posted actual results. As for apprentice logs, any that were posted were not intended to "prove" anything, but instead, reinforce a particular idea which was thrown out the window. For instance, speed was being debated, so, I posted a log of a first turn kill, which, well, was not taken well at all. And later, the inability to function under a null rod came up, and so I posted a log that provided meager evidence that the deck can function under such hate. Again, I state that you apparently skipped over several deck analysis section in which I quite blatently stated that the deck has a completely awful matchup against trinistax/ any workshop deck running trinisphere. If you have no intention of reading provided research before criticizing a deck, and are further unwilling to test the deck, then you have no right to even mention make notice to the deck.
In the future, please refrain from posting redundant information that only increases the already exuberant amounts of flame on this thread.
I appologize to all for the continued flame this thread has generated, and if a Mod wishes to close it, I'm fine with that.
--Jeff
