I think there are reasonable answers to all of your complaints.
Look at how anyone in this entire site responds to posts.
I thought that my comments were rather constructive and my assumptions justified. I'm not only saying this to defend myself, mind you. The facts were there.
Look at how quickly the moderators lock every sinfle thredad they disagree with.
The thread was locked because of the questionable name of your deck and because it would seem that you have not read the rules. This does not happen to "every single thread they disagree with" just to the threads that needed to be closed, such as yours.
And look at how people drool on the ft of people such as CarlWinter and MeanDeck bc they have won some tournaments.
These people have proven over and over again that they are really, really good players. They haven't merely "won some tournaments", they've won large tournaments and many of them (and, incidentally, the player you mentioned happens to be a World Champion).
Or do I jsut need to netdeck like the rest of you?
I personally don't play established archetypes because I enjoy playing something of my own devise. Just because you're playing a "rogue" deck doesn't mean you have an excuse for every time you lose ("omg that n00b was jus playin a stupid netdeck!!1 thats y i lost!!!1").
I think you took it too personally.
Sorry.