TheManaDrain.com
September 23, 2025, 11:33:48 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Tyrant Blue Strikes again! Top-8 at Myriad.  (Read 1257 times)
Harlequin
Full Members
Basic User
***
Posts: 1860


View Profile
« on: March 10, 2008, 03:07:14 pm »

< I'm on my way home now, so the deck list and some pre-thoughts are going to be added tonight or tomorrow. but here is the match breakdown >

Round - Zombie-light Dawn of the Dead.

I have an early remora fueled by tons of lands.  He has Bazaar/Squee online but I can tell hes reluctant to feed remora.  I repeal remora and replay it, and eventually drain a 2cc and get Tinker online.  My opponent has 2 turns comming thanks to Meditate - and I have the option for Tinker->DSC or Mindslaver.  I have remora down, he has a full grip with 3 mana and bazaar.  I opt for Mindslaver, knowing that I will be able to draw a bunch of cards off remora and get rid of the most dangerous 3 cards at least.  I'm rewarded for my decision because he has both balance and swords in his hand.  I have him play a few duresses to draw me cards merfolk looter style and pass the turn with him having only 2 squee's in hand.  Within a few turns I S&T or hardcast a tyrant, and the game is too far in my favor for him to recover.
I board in Spell Snares and Tormod's Crypt for G2.
I have an early Remora again, but this time he fires off Confidant, confidant (i counter the second), Tarmogoyf.  I lose to beats.
Game 3 I don't do much, he has tripple Cofidant on the board by turn 4.  Confidants bring me to 3 life and him to 5.  He swords one of his own guys at my EOT to go to 7 life and lethal dudes.

Round 2 - Scott Playing Flash
Jer had just lost to Flash, so he was having a mini-panic attack.  But I wasn't worried. 
Game1 Scott has a mediocre hand.   We have a counterwar over Merchant scroll, he wins it without pact but with 1 card in hand before it resolves.  He gets flash.  I'm not sure what to think he has two tapped mana in play, I could have sworn he was going to get ancestral.  He must have a hulk as the other card in hand?  I pass the turn, with 3 open mana and repeal with heartslivers name on it I also have brainfreeze in hand.  So If he has to play alot of spells to get to his win, I might be able to brainfreeze in response to the hulk trigger and get lucky.  He untaps and gushes floating 2 blue.  Then plays a land and burns for 2.  I topdeck Meditate, and decide that its now or never to get a counter in hand.  I meditate into 3 mox, and a land.  With the mox, and repeal on mox I have enough storm to mill about 21 or 24 cards.  I hit 3 verlents and his heart sliver and he concedes.
I board in 3 Spell Snares and 3 Brainfreezes
Scott keeps another risky hand, I have no turn1 counter - but I have remora.  He luckly does not win on turn 1.  He burns a lotus on turn 1 but comes up short on a land drop.  I feed remora, while scott is in topdeck mode for a land.  He gets a land, and we have a mini-war over his ancestrall.  I end up winning a misdirrect.  I assemble Tyrant+Show and tell and pass the turn with only a plable brainstorm in hand.  I keep the brainstorm to bounce the heart sliver with tyrant, and I keep swinging.  I draw into repeal and know that so long as I do nothing I have plenty of bounce power in hand to not worry about him getting his combo in play.

Round 3 - Sensie Sensie
Game 1  - I get way ahead of the race with an early Remora, the when it dies I have Jace and Library active.  I find a second remora and tinker for a quick DSC win.
Board in Snares and Brainfreezes
Game 2 - I have almost all my moxen in play early.  I have remora online.  I mediate a few times, and spell snare a Helm of awakening.  I let remora die, and draw into Brainfreeze.  He EOT intuitions for Futuresight x3.  I have two counters in hand and brainfreeze.  I have no win condition in sight when he casts Helm and futuresight.  I could counter and draw things out, but I decide to risk the brainfreeze win (which I would not have done if I was down a game).  He asks me if I know the combo, and I ask him to please play it out.  I let him get about 15 draws or so and see that he has revealed 1 cunning wish.  He has exactly 2 blue and a bunch of colorless open (he is playing his mox out).  He used his ancestral earlier.  With a Top activation on the stack, I brainfreeze him.  He thinks a bit and cunning wishes, and I counter, he then brianfreezes me in response.  I let that resolve (dumping my deck).  He passes the turn .. and I ask him how he intends to resolve his top's draw.  He realizes whats going on and I win.

Round 4 - Ichord.  Time for revenge.
So while we're shuffling up I mention that my deck has abouta  1 in 3 testing record against manaless ichorid... So I'm due for a win. 
Game 1 ... I lose to Ichorid.  No suprize there I have about a 1 in 15 chance on the draw game.
Board in 4 Crypts and 3 Brainfreeze
Game 2 - He fails to find dredgers for many turns.  I have an early crypt down with tons of mana.  I have Force, and MisD and Drain in hand.  So I'm feeling good.  He finally starts rolling, and decides to Ancient Grudge my Crypt.  I count up my mana an realize I'm exactly 2 mana short of hardcasting Tyrant.  Seems like a good time for drain!  I drain, save the crypt, draw meditate and hard cast tyrant.  I have crypt and Sapphire down when I untap so I decide that now is a good a time as any to meditate for a 2nd crypt or one of my 4 brainfreezes.  I get a freeze and win.
Game 3 - I have lotus, land, drain, MisD, and Brainfreeze x2 (and some other stuff).  Brainfreeze x2 is really good for me especially because I have lotus.  The plan is to deck him in turn 2 before his turn 3 kill (or deck him on my turn 2 with enough mox and stuff).  Luckly he has a very slow turn 1 and 2, so I can extend my kill zone one turn.  I pick up Meditate and tinker, and I have 6 mana open with a land in hand.  I am 1 mana short of tinker->slaver... so I can't do that.  I forget what I did, but I spent some mana, I think I have exactly 5 open including the lotus.
Well it comes time to Do or Die.  He gets a single bridge and an Ichorid, and 2 cabal therepies.  He casts Therepy.  Now I have a big decision to make... I really need to get a deck count on him - but I don't want to ask before the thepy resolves because he will surely name brainfreeze.  So I ask him for a second to think, and quickly (but carefully) start counting his graveyard, RFG, and in play cards.  I count exactly 33.  So 27 cards to mill thats 3 spells and brainfreeze for 4 then 5.   With only 5 mana, I have I need him to therepy twice so I can misdirrect in order for this to work.  After some quick deliberation I allow the therepy to resolve and hope he names Force of Will - which he does (and is probably the right call because I have a grip of 7, haven't forced yet, and just spent a good 30 secs thinking).  At this point I have the game, and I show him my hand.  And double check the # of cards in his deck by having him count.
A) If he casts the 2nd cabal in an attempt to hit the Brainfreezes I misdirrect pitching tinker and then cast my brainfreezes. 
B) If he doesn't I get another turn, and Tinker for Slaver.  Or Meditate hopeing to hit two playable spells, Tormod's crypt, brainfreeze #3 of, or Repeal (for 2 spells)... roughly one of 1/2 the cards left in my deck.  I can also tinker for Tormods crypt after I meditate and keep the brainfreezes in hand if I don't get enough playable spells.  In all likelyhood I'd just go for Slaver, mill 18 cards.  If he still has Cephalid Sage in the deck, then I win.  If not at least I burn all his flashbacks - then brainfreeze him to death on my next untap.

So at any rate, he ends up casting the Cabal therepy and I deck him exactly.  One quick "Untap, Upkeep, draw, pass the turn" and I win!

Round 5 - ID with ELD. 

We chat about the match I just had, and about metagame manipulation, and about shops, tyrant, and GAT...

Top 8 - Dan with Tyrant Oath.

I'm glad to be against Dan actaully.  Nice guy, great opponent, and playing a deck that I have tested well against.

Game 1 - I mull my first hand of 3 lands, a mox and 3 creatures.  Seems poor.  I mull into Land, Brainstorm, and some counters.  I topdeck remora so things are looking up... until I don't find another land.  Brainstorm reveals 2 turns of playing draw-go.  And I get oathed. 
As an interesting asside, as Dan is oathing he notices a misplaced Pithing Needle in his deck.  Dan Yarrington the TO has been using the March 1st rule about not properly unsiding - so this is now a warning, not a game loss.  Dan fixes his deck and we re-oath.  Dan appolgies for 'winning' that game because of a rule change.  I'm really not upset.  I had already lost that game... hard.  So its really no big deal to me. 
* all in all I think the rule is interesting.  Its odd because it promotes honesty at the cost of it being easier to cheat.  Its give an take, but ultimately if you are a cheater and its revealed that you are a cheater then you still will be treated like a cheater.  I like that in encourages honesty... instead of rewarding dishonesty like the old system did.

Anyway spell snares and brainfreezes in.  Now it comes down to the most contraversial side-out for this match.  Dark Steel colosus.  So DSC is terrible against Tyrant Oath.  I would basically never tinker for him unless I already burned slaver.  The theoretical use is that If we both deck the other eachother with brainfreeze in the same turn (remember post board I have 4).  I will have a draw, where my opponent will not.   I just need to be able to answer Krosan Rec. 
So we accumulate cards.  I have active library up and not a whole lot happens in the first few turns.  I also have brainfreeze in hand so I'm keeping my mana options open.   Now the game gets interesting, and I wish I had better notes:
So Dan casts Oath (with orchard), and I spell snare back.  He REBs.  Here is where I have a really important decision to make.  At the end of some brainstorm/fetching I have Force, Brainfreeze, Tyrant (a fair amount of mana six I think), Medidate, Repeal.  I'm pretty sure I want to force now.  he had 8 cards at the begining of this, and I want to keep the counterwar going - hopeing to get enough to brainfreeze.  If I pitch Tyrant, then I have to win the counterwar and I'm dry on counters.  Also If I can't deck him... that meditate has to really give me good cards AND the top two cards are not amazing.  If I pitch meditate I have to hope to find mana.  I decide rather quickly to pitch Meditate (which I think was a mistake).  I kinda forget the rest of the stack, I think I poped my lotus, ancestralled and brainstormed. I think I forced another spell of his pitching Tinker. The top cards of my library were land, DSC.  But ultimately I allow the stack to resolve which gives him the oath of druids.  And at the end of it all I was able to  I swoop in with my lethal brainfreeze.  Now I've already basically punted the game.  I should have kept the meditate #1.  I didn't have enough forsight to see that... no mater what I do, I'm going to get the lethal freeze - even if its after he oaths.  After that Meditate is my win condition (ie skipping turns).  The thing is, I have no counter for Krosan... so I'm Screwed either way.  Next way I punted.  I should have targeted myself with 1 copy of brainfreeze, and shuffled my Darksteel.  That way I wouldn't draw it.  The third way I punted was not just leaving the DSC on top of my deck, and saying "F repeal".  So thats what happened, I repealed and drew DSC passed the turn with no counters and lost to hardcast tyrant out of the yard with brainfreeze as his only way to win.

Oh well.
Logged

Member of Team ~ R&D ~
Shock Wave
Adepts
Basic User
****
Posts: 1436



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: March 10, 2008, 04:12:21 pm »

Interesting report. It seems as though you're finding ways to win because you understand your deck well and have well designed plans against specific archetypes. This seems like the type of deck that it not very intuitive to play, but can be very rewarding because of its surprise factor. Equally interesting is that you had outs in the games that you lost. Sometimes you lose and you're not in the game, but to lose because of your own play mistake is actually a compliment to the design of your deck.
Logged

"Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs even though checkered by failure, than to rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy nor suffer much because they live in the gray twilight that knows neither victory nor defeat." 
- Theodore Roosevelt
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.03 seconds with 17 queries.