If skill is not a factor at all, then there is no "best players" there's only "lucky players" and "unlucky players".
Untrue. Winning is a function of both probability of t8 AND frequency of attendance. There's a cute argument that the most frequent tournament attendees in a skill-free world will put up the most wins...explaining the higher win *counts* of the "best players."
That still does not make them "better" since they only put up more results by playing in more tournaments....Sort of like...Me getting "heads" with a coin more times then you by simply flipping 10 times as many coins as you.
Anyway, i do not believe that there is a skill-less format, and the only skill-less deck i can think of in all of magic is burn. (Although there might even be a bit of skill involved in making the optimal burn list...)