Diakonov
Full Members
Basic User
  
Posts: 758
Hey Now
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: March 28, 2011, 08:59:02 pm » |
|
If we're playing sanctioned, we always keep the rares we draft and pay more up front for prize support. Non-sanctioned, ranking determines pick-order.
There are basically two modes in which we play for a 6 man team draft: A. winning team takes all, or B. winning team gets the first three picks, followed by three picks from the losing team, then the winning team takes the rest. Our group currently seems to have some disagreement with how it should work when dividing up the picks among the winning team. Currently we go by record and using a die roll to break any ties. However, just last night I opened a Tezzeret and our team lost, and 2 members of the opposing team basically got owned. In my opinion, and the opinion of a few others in our group, when the difference between pick 1 and 2 is $30, the team should try to sort it out a bit more fairly. Almost always, someone would be willing to buy out the card and the other two players can split the cash.
As far as take-backs go in our group, there is a general understanding that during sanctioned events between competitive players, take-backs are frowned upon and pretty much don't happen. In non-sanctioned, it totally depends on the player personality and the degree of the mistake. I tend toward lenient here: if you already untapped and forgot to sac your Nihil Spellbomb EOT, then sure, go for it. I try to be a bit more strict about it during team drafting since my leniency affects my party. In general I think I should be stricter than I am, and I often kick myself later for being too forgiving.
I believe that the degree of prize at stake, the gamestate/game/match situation, individual personality, familiarity with the person, and the opponent's transparent level of experience are all variables that factor into how people decide to handle take-backs.
|