TheManaDrain.com
September 29, 2025, 01:49:51 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Linked Events
  • Xtreme Games Monthly Vintage: October 26, 2013
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Xtreme Games Monthly Vintage 10026/13 Now on Saturdays  (Read 3905 times)
XtremeGamesOnline
Tournament Organizers
Basic User
**
Posts: 153


xtremegames2199
View Profile WWW Email
« on: October 20, 2013, 12:01:23 pm »

Xtreme Games
2108 E. Grand Ave
Lindenhurst, IL 60046

www.xtremegamesonline.com

Xtreme Games monthly Vintage tournament Now on Saturdays.


12:00-12:45 REG
1:00 START

10 PROXIE LIMIT
$1.00 PER PROXIE AFTER 10 UP TO 20 TOTAL
$25 entry

PRIZES:


THESE ARE APPROXIMATE PAYOUTS (actual breakdown based on attendance)
TOP 8:
1ST PLACE 30%
2ND PLACE 20%
3RD PLACE 10%
4TH PLACE 10%
5TH - 8TH PLACE 5%

TOP 4:
1ST PLACE 40%
2ND PLACE 30%
3RD PLACE 10%
4TH PLACE 10%


Hope to see all of you there!
We also will be running a Booster Draft @ 3:30

BRING YOUR EDH DECKS!!

All proxies must follow these guidelines:

Please do not use the back of a magic card for a proxie!

There are two types of acceptable proxies. The first and most basic is taking a basic land card and writing the details of the card on it. The second method is to take a card that shares some of the characteristics with the card that is being proxied and erase any characteristics that do not match, replacing them with the correct characteristics.

All proxies must have the following text neatly printed, using a extra fine point sharpie. Ball point pens may not be used:
• The full name of the card (no abbreviations or nicknames)
• Correct casting cost of the card including all colored mana symbols
• All relevant/game effecting text

When choosing what card to use as the base for an erased proxy players must follow these rules:
• The mana cost of the base spell must be the same as the card being proxied.
• The type of the card being proxied must be the same as the base card.
• The P/T of a creature being proxied must be the same as the base creature P/T
• When proxying a creature it may be difficult to find a creature where all characteristics match. In this case, mana cost is the most important, followed by the P/T, followed by the subtype. Any characteristics that do not match must be erased and corrected.
• The art box, card name, and text box must be totally erased. White out may not be used for this as it affects the stiffness of the card and may mark it.
• When adding text to the card do not use a ball point pen. A extra fine point sharpie is the best thing to use. A ball point pen can cause indentations on the card marking it.
• For clarity reasons, the use of cards with the new card frame is strongly encouraged
Logged
Tha Gunslinga
Full Members
Basic User
***
Posts: 1583


De-Errata Mystical Tutor!

ThaGunslingaMOTL
View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: October 25, 2013, 09:27:09 am »

I will try to be there.  The Salad needs me.
Logged

Don't tolerate splittin'
Tha Gunslinga
Full Members
Basic User
***
Posts: 1583


De-Errata Mystical Tutor!

ThaGunslingaMOTL
View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: October 27, 2013, 07:58:42 am »

11 people.  I won with LandStill.
Logged

Don't tolerate splittin'
hvndr3d y34r h3x
Basic User
**
Posts: 823


80:20 against LordHomerCat, the word's 2nd best an


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: October 27, 2013, 10:36:39 am »

Things that did not do well: decks with burning wish.
Logged

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am 80:20 against LordHomerCat, the word's 2nd best and on other days the world's best vintage player. Wink
Tha Gunslinga
Full Members
Basic User
***
Posts: 1583


De-Errata Mystical Tutor!

ThaGunslingaMOTL
View Profile Email
« Reply #4 on: October 27, 2013, 07:21:55 pm »

Things that did not do well: decks with burning wish.

Man, Burning Oath's matchup vs Landstill is just abyssmal.  It was good times.
Logged

Don't tolerate splittin'
Samoht
Adepts
Basic User
****
Posts: 1392


Team RST


View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: October 28, 2013, 12:18:33 am »

Things that did not do well: decks with burning wish.

Man, Burning Oath's matchup vs Vintage decks is just abyssmal.  It was good times.

Fixed
Logged

Char? Char you! I like the play.
-Randy Bueller

I swear I'll burn the city down to show you the light.

The best part of believe is the lie
hvndr3d y34r h3x
Basic User
**
Posts: 823


80:20 against LordHomerCat, the word's 2nd best an


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: October 28, 2013, 09:09:19 am »

Also two bug lists in top 4. One with delver one without delver. Both seemed very strong. Delverless bug won game one by a land slide (pun intended). Landstill won a very swingy game two one the back of multiple pyroclasms and throwing jace after jace under the bus, about 15 cards left in each library. Landstill won another long, but less exciting, game three due to a bad keep by bug.
« Last Edit: October 28, 2013, 09:16:03 am by hvndr3d y34r h3x » Logged

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am 80:20 against LordHomerCat, the word's 2nd best and on other days the world's best vintage player. Wink
Twaun007
Adepts
Basic User
****
Posts: 1527


For eight hundred years have I trained Jedi.

Twaun007
View Profile
« Reply #7 on: October 28, 2013, 10:42:21 am »

I won with LandStill.

I see ICBM is still rocking the 1st place podium up in the Midwest!

Congratz
Logged

This... Right here... Is my new Lambo...

Carpe Librum

You can't ask a bird not to fly!
You can't ask a fish not to swim!
You can't ask a Chinese guy not to turn back into a tiger at midnight!
It's who I am.

Cleveland
Smmenen
2007 Vintage World Champion
Adepts
Basic User
****
Posts: 6392


Smmenen
View Profile WWW
« Reply #8 on: October 28, 2013, 08:02:42 pm »

Things that did not do well: decks with burning wish.

Man, Burning Oath's matchup vs Vintage decks is just abyssmal.  It was good times.

Fixed

*sigh*

Taking the high road here: http://www.morphling.de/top8decks.php?id=1751
http://www.morphling.de/top8decks.php?id=1772

Etc.

yes, Landstill is a bad matchup for Burning Tendrils.  Nothing particularly novel about that fact. 
Logged

MTGFan
Basic User
**
Posts: 273


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: October 29, 2013, 11:29:35 am »

yes, Landstill is a bad matchup for Burning Tendrils.  Nothing particularly novel about that fact. 

In general, combo punts the control matchup unless said combo deck has access to a healthy amount of countermagic itself.

Logged
hvndr3d y34r h3x
Basic User
**
Posts: 823


80:20 against LordHomerCat, the word's 2nd best an


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: October 29, 2013, 11:41:35 am »

yes, Landstill is a bad matchup for Burning Tendrils.  Nothing particularly novel about that fact.  

In general, combo punts the control matchup unless said combo deck has access to a healthy amount of countermagic itself.


The meta contained one whole landstill deck, just sayin'. Also,the pilots there were boasting the lists contained a healthy chunk of counter magic, so idk what to tell you there either. The exact phrase I heard was "it shores up bad match ups without giving up to much to the good ones". Given the 2 or 3 pilots seemed to not win any games, but regularly do very well in large events, I'd say the lists weren't very good.

Unless deluge mixes things up for champs, I'd be be on a midranged xUG deck.
« Last Edit: October 29, 2013, 11:45:46 am by hvndr3d y34r h3x » Logged

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am 80:20 against LordHomerCat, the word's 2nd best and on other days the world's best vintage player. Wink
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.042 seconds with 20 queries.