R/B Arcbound Butcher T1

[Kees]

Hello, i made a t1 deck, with lots of t2 peaces, i know it's not good to use much t2 in t1, but check it out, mayb you can give me some tips.

creatures
4x arcbound worker
4x arcbound ravanger
2x arcbound relaimer
4x frogmite
3x diciple of the vault/mayb welder is better
3x natuko shade

Spells
4x sinkhole
4x diabolic edict/mayb terminate
4x sharpnel blast
4x skullclamp

mana
4x dark ritual
1x mana vault
1x mana crypt
1x solring
1x lotus petal
4x ancient tomb
4x bloodstained mire
4x badlands
3x wasteland
1x stripmine

thx in advance for the tips

[jCoKn]

Hmm.... Let me start with what I believe are the flaws in the deck:

1. The inclusion of "arcbound relaimer" or Arcbound Reclaimer... Even in Type 2 this is cast away as fairly useless, especially in a combo deck such as this where you want to win uber-quick and the mana curve is so low.

2.  The inclusion of "natuko shade" or Nantuko Shade... Why? How is this better than its current spotfiller, Myr Enforcer, AND he's not T2 so he's not as tech.

3. Dark Ritual = no. Ornithopter = yes. A 0-drop that is an outlet for Ravager's counters, a saccable to Ravager/Shrap Blast and plus, what does D.Rit give you? Super speed so you can go first turn...

4. Sinkholes! Okay... Mixing Sui and T1 Ravager is a no-no. They have no synergy whatsoever. With Ravager, you want lots and lots and lots of artifacts (aka moxen/lotus). I understand if you're on a budget... so am I... but just about all T1 tourneys have about 5 proxy so there they are. If not, Workshops.

To answer your question about Welder vs. Disciple ... This should be a no-brainer. Disciple should be fairly obvious because this deck is supposed to be combo, not sinkhole/welder/terminate control. Let me show you what I'd change.

-4 sinkhole
-4 edict/terminate
-4 dark ritual
-3 nantuko shade
-2 arcbound reclaimer
-2 badlands
-2 ancient tomb
-4 bloodstained mire

+4 ornithopter
+4 myr enforcer
+4 thoughtcast
+4 glimmervoid
+1 tolarian academy
+4 moxen
+1 lotus
+3 fling

I'm assuming first off that you want to keep red, and second that you own no Force of Wills. If you did, there would already be blue in this deck. Sorry if I somewhat mutilated your idea, but I just think that your version was going nowhere, fast. Good luck with it.

[proGaming]

I'm sorry if I am playing "Moderator" here but how many threads like this do we need to see?  Please edit your post because simply giving us a deck and asking us to make it better is just silly.  Our lives don't revolve around coming online, looking at someone's deck, playtesting it and tell you the flaws of the deck.  You need to add discussion, playtesting notes, your metagame and card choices.

[Toad]

Threads without content are moved to Newbie.
-- Toad.