TheManaDrain.com
September 23, 2025, 05:24:03 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: [Deck Discussion] Deez Noughts  (Read 2286 times)
FTKzak
Basic User
**
Posts: 44


View Profile Email
« on: September 05, 2007, 03:04:56 pm »

I couldn't find a thread discussing this deck outside of the Tournament Report Forum and it has fallen by the wayside, so I wanted to start one here to engender some discussion. This deck should be getting a lot more attention than it is!

As an answer to GAT and hate decks - this is brutal. It can run a ton of basics, it's win condition/combo doubles as waste effects, 12/12 tramplers are really hard to chump block with weenie dryads and tarmogoyfs and fishies. It plays a lot like SS, and can attack your game on a bunch of different fronts, switching gears if it needs too. In his report, TK states that GAT is a really great matchup for him, and I can agree with that - I lost 9 out of 10 games running GAT against this monstrosity.

The Decklist as reported by TK:

DEEZ NOUGHTS – A Tommy Kolowith creation

4 phyrexian dreadnought
2 illusionary mask
4 stifle
1 trickbind
1 tinker
4 force of will
4 brainstorm
4 duress
4 dark confidant
2 dimir cutpurse
1 ancestral recall
1 vampiric tutor
1 mystical tutor
1 demonic tutor
1 time walk
2 spell snare
1 echoing truth
3 waste land
1 strip mine
4 polluted delta
1 bloodstained mire
4 underground sea
2 islands
1 swamp
1 mox ruby
1 mox jet
1 mox sapphire
1 black lotus
1 mana crypt
1 lotus petal


Changes worth considering: Trinket Mage for the Dimir Cutpurse. It finds Dreadnoughts, and it beats for 2.

Link to TK's tournament report and resulting deck discussion:

http://www.themanadrain.com/index.php?topic=33997.0


If the mods could merge the discussion from the report into this thread, that would be great.


DISCLAIMER: I have done no work on this deck and can claim no credit for it other than to attest to its capability to utterly wreck Gro-A-Tog. I don't want to steal other people's thunder - but I do think there should be more noise being made about this creation.
« Last Edit: September 05, 2007, 03:08:19 pm by FTKzak » Logged

RIT Magic
TK
Basic User
**
Posts: 83

xtk87x
View Profile
« Reply #1 on: September 05, 2007, 03:47:00 pm »

Trinket mage is a definate consideration for the deck, but i dont think they fit in this version very well. sure they can fetch the noughts but thats all they can really do. i think if you were to maybe play a more controling/drain version where you could maybe fit in a few other utility cards to grab with the mage it would be more useful. the cutpurse is really jsut used a a draw engine in the deck. i just didnt feel that the 4 bobs were enough.

I think one reason that this deck hasnt got that much attention yet is because of just how good gat is. Gat is by far the more powerful deck at the moment. This deck in my opinion atleast is a lot harder to play then gat.
Logged

TK proud Member of team ICBM
Phele
Basic User
**
Posts: 562


Tom Bombadil


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: September 05, 2007, 04:27:14 pm »

This were the things, Tommy decklist differed from my creation DARK ILLUSIONS. You can take it as starting point for some general discussion:

-2 Spell Snare
+ 2 Mana Leak

A metagame call as we do still have a big amount of Staxx and Storm and not that many GAT and Flash. I prefer the Leaks for their general usefulness and how they fit in the deck principle (mana denial). In a field full of GAT and Flash - that we don't have over here - I would play Spell Snares as well.

- 2 Cutpurse
+ 2 Merchant Scroll

I leave it to you, which choice for card advantage is the better. I think in a field full of creatures/blockers and in a deck, that very often operates just with two mana on the table, I don't like the cutpurses that much. If they worked out for Tommy, great! I just think as close the disruption package is to SS: In the end this deck plays out different than just SS with Noughts. While SS is a pure control deck, this is much more aggro control. And for instance, if there is a Nought on the board, I would rather see a Scroll than a Cutpurse. I often found them very clunky. Imo that's a general assumption in the moment, as there are too many blockers in the field. I can't think of any competitive deck in the moment beside Flash maybe that doesn't have a critter arround.

- 1 Duress
+ 1 Daze

Sure, four Duress is a great threat against any Combo. But I prefer a good mix of disruption spells, what is good just alone for psychological reasons. But Daze can also be a handy tutor target in some situations - for example: four mana on the board, your opponent outtapped. You have Confidant and Scroll in your hand. It might not be the worst move to go for Daze and then push Confidant through the Force of Will wall. It's just hypothetical, but believe me: there are situations where you love it to have Daze in the deck.

- 1 Trickbind
+ 1 Illusionary Mask

I changed that in the meantime, as Trickbind is good to have in a deck that plays Scrolls. But against counterheavy control decks and against Staxx, the third Mask would still be the better choice.

- 1 Tinker
+ 1 Explosives

Tinker cost more than Mask, cost you an extra card in form of an artifact you very often don't have, is REBable and finds you in Tommy's build just Mask or Lotus or Dreadnought, which you then have to stifle. That all for the Collossus in the board and sometimes to go around Chalice Two, I am not sure, if I like that. You can go around Chalice with Stifle anyway, to bring in Dreadnought or bring in Mask. But the Collossus in the board might have good uses against heavy artifact removal decks.

But I often tried to force Tinker in this deck as well, as I thought it's impossible to leave this powerful card out. But in the end, it never seemed to fit. My starting point would be to play it with Platz in the maindeck, but so far: I play without it.

Explosives rounds up the disruption/removal base perfectly, as It handles Welder and Moxen, Oath, Meddlings, Dreadnoughts ( Wink ) very smooth. I would never go out of the house without at least one.

- 1 Mystical
- 1 Mana Crypt
+ 2 off color Moxen

Yes, Mystical is great in this deck, and I included it meanwhile as well, as it finds Time Walk – the most impressive card in the deck, when you have either Confidant(s) or Dreadnought on the board. Mana Crypt can be good to bring in the first round Mask + Nought. But I rarely go for this move. I think the best move you can do with this deck many times is to play a Confidant first turn, which functions well with the whole set of Moxen. Beside the first turn Mask + Nought, what for sure can be great, I don't see really an overwhelming reason to play Crypt instead a Mox, as even in that deck with such a low average casting cost life loss summs up, especially in a field full of attackers. But Crypt is ok, if you want to run it, but I don't think it's really necessary.

- 1 Bloodstained Mire
+ 1 Flooded Strand

Against the decks, I need Basics the most - Fish and Staxx - after boarding the basic Island get even more important, as the main weapons out of my board against them are blue, and Duress gets out. Tommy plays Edicts. And Confidant is also a good move against both decks, so his choice of Bloodstained might be the correct one for him. I prefer to have more possibilities to get basic Islands.

That was in the last thread.

Other thoughts:

For a very long time, I didn't play Yawgmoth's Will in this deck for a few reasons: Its quite costy and I tried to avoid three color spells maindeck as much as possible. It's black. And it doesn't generate that great card advantage as it does in other builds like Long or Gifts. But it still does create enough card advantage: Even an extra Fetchland and Brainstorm is usually worth its investment. And you sometimes really love a way to recurr your Time Walk. So yes, I do play this little goodie meanwhile in the mainboard, that looks that way in the moment:

4 Phyrexian Dreadnoughts
2 Illusionary Mask
1 Explosives

4 Force of Will
4 Brainstorm
4 Stifle
2 Mana Leak
1 Merchant Scroll
1 Trickbind
1 Daze
1 Mystical Tutor
1 Ancestral Recall
1 Time Walk
1 Echoing Truth

4 Dark Confidant
3 Duress
1 Demonic Tutor
1 Vampiric Tutor
1 Yawgmoth's Will

1 Mox Sapphire
1 Mox Jet
1 Mox Ruby
1 Mox Emerald
1 Mox Pearl
1 Lotus Petal
1 Black Lotus
4 Polluted Delta
1 Flooded Strand
3 Island
1 Swamp
3 Underground Sea
3 Wasteland
1 Strip Mine

If you dislike 61 cards too much, cut one off color mox if you like. I always felt it not needed with this consitant deck, that plays out very fine with its 23 mana/38 spells ratio. But as general consensus goes to 60 cards, cut a Ruby or whatever.

I discussed this with a friend in another board: I don't play a second Swamp, I don't even play a fourth U-Sea. It might be a matter of playstyle as I am a very carefull fetcher and brainstormer, but I was never black screwed and I play in a field, where Staxx and Fish is common. I prefer to have as many basics as possible (and still play at least four strip effects and not more than 17 Lands), to not get in danger of Wastelands, as my weapons against the named matchups in the board are heavy blue.

What Tommy said about Trinket Mage is absolutly true, even though it is true for Cutpurse as well. Trinkets fit in a more controlish build. I always wanted to try out something with Trinkets, Tormod, Explosves and Acadamy Ruins to bring back the tools and Mask/Dreadnought, but always came back to this one, as I felt it just the stronger build.

Even without Trinkets I thought about Acadamy Ruins as recuring Explosives and Dreadnougth can be great against many decks, but it never made the cut as being just too much of a toy.

Other maindeck candidates could be Imperial Seal for obvious reasons or Demonic Consultation for even more obvious reasons Wink But in testing I hated it to remove too many of my dreadnoughts. The deck isn't controlish enough to risk that in my eyes. But for sure: With such a consistant spellbase Consultation should be a candidate.

Sideboard: This is something, that is in a continuous variation. In the moment

2 Spell Snare
2 Hurkyls Recall
1 Threads of Disloyalty
1 Seasinger
1 Old Man of the Sea
1 Echoing Truth
3 Yxlid Jailer
1 Extirpate
2 Pithing Needle
1 Engineered Explosives

Other great candidates are: Chains of Mephistopheles (!), Massacre, Smother, Anull, Disrupt, Planar Void and Kira, Great Glass Spinner.

I don't fear Chalice Two too much, as you can easily play around that with Stifle + Dreadnought or just Stifle the Chalice. And I still play two Explosves overall to remove the Chalices. If you still fear Chalice, play a Rushing River instead of the sideboard Truth. I don't like Rebuild, as bouncing my own Dreadnoughts is the last thing I want to do against Staxx.

Extirpate is a nice tutor target against Flash or Oath what cooperates quite well with Duress and Explosives. It can also come in pretty handy against GAT to remove Gushes, or Duals or Forces. I would love to play two in the board, but don't see space.

Jailers and Needles always seemed enough for me to fight Ichorid. They interact perfectly with Stifle and Wastelands as well. Needles are also nice options against Staxx or Landstill and everthing random. Jailer have no real further use but I board them against Goblins functioning as bad sorcery removal.

The extra Truth and Explosves are to round up your toolbox against decks where they work the best, say Oath and Fish. The second bounce is especially needed for Platz. Truth could be a Rushing River for Meddling/Chalice reasons as mentionend.

The single blue controlers seem to be a good mix to me, as you can bring in two usefull ones against many matchups, say Threads and Seasinger against GAT, Threads and Old Man against Fish and SS. Threads and Seasinger against Dark Illusions, Seasinger and Old Man against Bomberman ... and so on. Single ones can also be good in many matchups: Seasinger against Slaver and Oath (I notices that more and more Simic is left out of Oath sideboards), Old Man against Goblins .... I like this configuration, as it gives you a consistant sideboard strategy without leaving you too unflexible with just Old Mans or just Threads. Also: You should always play at least a few creatures in the sideboard, to make better use of the Mask.

I just can underline what the thread starter said before: This deck is a monster, has a good GAT and a gordious Flash matchup, plays out fine against Oath, Bomberman, Slaver, Fish and Storm Variants and has the biggest issues with Staxx and sometimes pure Aggro, but is still on a good run against these matchups. It's a great deck, a serious contender and I love it for a very long time now. I especially like, what was mentioned before, how easily you can change the way too attack your opponents strategy. Just smash him with the big one, try to go the pure Mana Denial route, play it out like Ophidian Control for a while ...

Key card really is Stifle, so the errata pushed that deck to an even higher tier status. As much as people say, that it's easy to play around Stifle, when you know, that you play against it. It weakens their strategy nevertheless, by forcing them to modify their strategy. And it fills out many, many functions in this deck. Very often it's used as the said mana denial element. But very often it functions as mini Time Walk against Oath, Salvagers, Welder, Stacks ... and this deck likes Time Walks. Don't forget, you play a 12/12 trample dude for one Wink. Good moves are alway as well stifling Bazar activations, protect your mana base, stifling Explosives, Seal of Cleansings or even storm spells sometimes.

A thing to think about would be a color splash. I often toyed around with Red for REB, Pyroclasm, Rack and Ruin and Fling. But I still think, you can do most of these effects with just U/B and without weakening your manabase. White is also an option with Mindcensores fitting in the deck theme and Seal of Cleansing being a great option for the sideboard. But alway ask yourself, if you really need them.
« Last Edit: September 06, 2007, 02:34:41 am by Phele » Logged

Tom Bombadil is a merry fellow; Bright blue his jacket is, and his boots are yellow.

Free Illusionary Mask!!
beder
Basic User
**
Posts: 278


View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: September 06, 2007, 05:05:40 am »

Hi,  (sorry for my English, message from France)

Nice to see that people are still interested in Nought Decks and that i am not the only one to think that it can be a very serious challenger in today's metagame (especially because stifle or trickbind main deck is a serious disruption for flash).

Here is the current build i am using. This build is control oriented and there is no mana disruption. Point is with GAT and Flash, I am not 100% confortable with the mana discruption road...

So here is the deck
 
// Lands
    3 Swamp
    4 Polluted Delta
    4 Island
    3 Underground Sea
    2 Riptide Laboratory

    1 Mox Sapphire
    1 Black Lotus
    1 Mox Jet
    1 Mox Pearl
    1 Mox Emerald
    1 Mox Ruby

// Creatures
   
    2 Trinket Mage
    3 Phyrexian Dreadnought
    3 Voidmage Apprentice
    4 Dark Confidant

    4 Illusionary Mask
    2 Trickbind
 
    4 Force of Will
    4 Duress
   
    4 Brainstorm   
    1 Demonic Tutor
    1 Vampiric Tutor
   
    1 Ancestral Recall
    1 Time Walk

// Tool Kit   
    1 Repeal
    1 Pithing Needle
    1 Engineered Explosives
    1 AEther Spellbomb

This deck relies a lot more than Phele's one on the mask. But i think it is also more consistant and can easily find a solution to adress a specific problem.
The mana base is really stable and don't really fear wasteland or other fashion dude like "Magnus of the Moon".
Early disruption is based on "Duress + FOW".
The draw engine is quite efficent :
- Confidant
- Brainstorm
- Trinket
- Utility spells (aether+repeal)

I am not going to detail the different matchups given that this is quite a recent evolution of a previous build (see Thread about "Utah Jazz Deck") : add of 2 Trinket Mage in order to give me easy access to a "Mini Tool Kit" + "Phyrexian". Morevoer, it provides me with a nice 2/2. Sometimes, with the help of Confidant, it is sufficent to win the game Smile

Please, feel free to react, this build and Phele's one are really different, two different strategies but both works quite well.


Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.406 seconds with 21 queries.