TheManaDrain.com
October 16, 2025, 02:03:13 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Lim-Dul's Vault  (Read 1102 times)
Rubik_3x3x3
Basic User
**
Posts: 38



View Profile
« on: May 11, 2009, 08:27:32 pm »

Why isn't this card more heavily played? It seems pretty similar to a Vampric Tutor for 2, and that seems alright if not good. Anyone care to explain the lack of Lim-Dul's Vaults in the meta to me?
Logged
meadbert
Adepts
Basic User
****
Posts: 1341


View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: May 11, 2009, 09:14:40 pm »

The short answer is that it is barely not good enough.

Compare Demonic Tutor to Vampiric Tutor.  Basically everyone agrees that Demonic Tutor is better despite costing more and being Sorcery Speed.

Now add  {B} and some life to the casting cost of each.

Demonic Tutor just became Grim Tutor which is sort of Barely good enough to see play.  It basically only shows up in Long/TPS decks and then usually not as a 4of (Although Stephen Menendian recently suggested a Grim Long list with 4xGrim Tutor)
Anyway, the point is that Grim Tutor just became barely playable.  Vampiric Tutor which started worse than Demonic Tutor just became Lim-Dul's Vault which is worse than Grim Tutor.  This leave Lim-Dul's vault as barely not playable.
The comparison is not exact since Lim-Dul's Vault is not a straight top-deck tutor.  It can help more than just a top deck tutor and it is blue and thus pitches to Force, but you generally pay more than 3 life like you do for Grim Tutor.

I would not be that surprised if a used for Lim-Dul's Vault were found and it were playable in some deck, but its general power is slightly less than Grim Tutor which is why I expect it to continue to be played less than Grim Tutor.
Logged

T1: Arsenal
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.027 seconds with 18 queries.