evouga
|
 |
« on: September 13, 2014, 08:58:29 pm » |
|
The VSL has convinced me to try out Vintage on MTGO, so I dusted off my old Dragon Oath list and made a few updates:
Mana base:
4x Forbidden Orchard 3x Polluted Delta 2x Flooded Strand 2x Underground Sea 2x Tropical Island 1x Island 1x Tolarian Academy 1x Black Lotus 5x Mox 1x Mana Crypt
Combo:
4x Oath of Druids 1x Blightsteel Colossus 1x Emrakul, the Aeons Torn 2x Dragon Breath
Search:
1x Ancestral Recall 1x Brainstorm 1x Ponder 1x Thirst for Knowledge 1x Preordain 1x Demonic Tutor 1x Vampiric Tutor 2x Sensei's Divining Top 2x Dig Through Time
Disruption: 2x Thoughtseize 4x Force of Will 1x Misdirection 2x Mental Misstep 1x Swan Song 1x Repeal 2x Nature's Claim 1x Abrupt Decay 1x Toxic Deluge
Misc: 1x Tinker 1x Time Vault 1x Voltaic Key 1x Time Walk
Sideboard:
4x Leyline of the Void 2x Ravenous Trap 1x Toxic Deluge 1x Abrupt Decay 1x Nature's Claim 2x Pithing Needle 2x Mental Misstep 1x Flusterstorm 1x Steel Sabotage
Do you guys have any advice? In particular,
1. Am I completely nuts for running Bot/Emrakul rather than Griselbrand? On the one hand, getting rid of Dragon Breath frees up two dead slots... on the other hand, winning on the spot has mattered in many of my test games, including when at < 8 life, when facing down an opposing active Jace, etc.
2. Impulse is not that great, but if I replace them with, say, Preordain I become dangerously low on shuffle effects. Is there a better option?
3. Right now the deck is weak against more dedicated control decks: if the deck can't force through an early bomb it has little hope in the late game. Landstill is a nightmare matchup, but fortunately few people play it on MTGO. On the other hand, MTGO appears to be infested with Dack Slaver and UR Delver builds; any advice on improving these matchups?
|
|
« Last Edit: October 23, 2014, 10:38:43 pm by evouga »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Oath Breaker
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: September 13, 2014, 09:44:12 pm » |
|
Two suggestions, add a 4th Orchard, and you need Misdirection in the mainboard. Dragon Oath is one of my favourite decks to play with cardboard, but it seems to crumple under the new Oath decks, and most other control decks. I would love to hear how it does in MTGO. Good luck, Kevin
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
evouga
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: September 14, 2014, 01:25:49 am » |
|
Two suggestions, add a 4th Orchard, and you need Misdirection in the mainboard. Dragon Oath is one of my favourite decks to play with cardboard, but it seems to crumple under the new Oath decks, and most other control decks. I would love to hear how it does in MTGO. Good luck, Kevin
Done, though for some bizarre reason a Misdirection costs more than a Mox Jet online. Crazy. I've played about 20 matches so far, at least 15 of which featured an opponent with Volcanic Island. I've yet to play the Oath mirror so I don't know how bad the matchup is.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
shrewarmies
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: September 14, 2014, 05:40:35 am » |
|
Any particular for the lack of mana crypt. For most of your spell base it seems better than sol ring in most functions. Especially when you want to land oath early.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
enderfall
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: September 14, 2014, 09:27:00 am » |
|
Maybe you want to replace Spell Pierce with a Swan Song? I still think most Oath players are ignoring this card way too much. Pierce is only able to hit Spheres/Wire from MUD decks, which is nothing to scoff at, but Swan Song is a hard counter, unlike Pierce, which makes it infinitely better after turn 2/3 (or so)
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Greg
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: September 15, 2014, 10:54:13 am » |
|
While I haven't played an Oath of Druids deck featuring Dragon Breath in quite some time and am not actively thinking about it anymore, it's worth noting how well Thirst For Knowledge fits into this deck.
Thirst For Knowledge allows you to shuffle Emrakul, The Aeons Torn and Blightsteel Colossus back into your library from your hand. It also helps take a Dragon Breath that unfortunately found its way into your hand and put it in the graveyard where it belongs. Outside of Thirst For Knowledge simply being a good card to begin with, these "bonus" interactions make it an obvious inclusion.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
evouga
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: September 15, 2014, 11:38:50 am » |
|
Thanks guys. I agree leaving out TfK was a mistake. I'm also going to test replacing Sol Ring with Mana Crypt -- in the past, I've felt the life loss wasn't worth the extra speed, but now that Mental Misstep and Dack Fayden are everywhere Sol Ring has lost a lot of its luster.
I'll try out Swan Song, but I have to admit I'm a bit skeptical -- giving my opponent a 2/2 speeds up the clock quite a bit, and the fact that the Swan can chump block Emrakul is annoying.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
msg67183
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: September 15, 2014, 11:44:31 am » |
|
Thanks guys. I agree leaving out TfK was a mistake. I'm also going to test replacing Sol Ring with Mana Crypt -- in the past, I've felt the life loss wasn't worth the extra speed, but now that Mental Misstep and Dack Fayden are everywhere Sol Ring has lost a lot of its luster.
I'll try out Swan Song, but I have to admit I'm a bit skeptical -- giving my opponent a 2/2 speeds up the clock quite a bit, and the fact that the Swan can chump block Emrakul is annoying.
You're playing Oath.... You want them to have a creature, that's why you play Forbidden Orchard. Swan Song allows you to give them a creature without relying on Orchard.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Bloomsburg Tournaments: 1 Win 3 Finals 2 Top 4 2 Top 8 Outside Bloomsburg: Winter Grudge Match lV Top 4 Creator of The Mana Drain Vintage League. Website for The League: http://tmdvl.github.ioZombies ate your brains!
|
|
|
Samoht
Adepts
Basic User
   
Posts: 1392
Team RST
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: September 15, 2014, 12:09:31 pm » |
|
Thanks guys. I agree leaving out TfK was a mistake. I'm also going to test replacing Sol Ring with Mana Crypt -- in the past, I've felt the life loss wasn't worth the extra speed, but now that Mental Misstep and Dack Fayden are everywhere Sol Ring has lost a lot of its luster.
I'll try out Swan Song, but I have to admit I'm a bit skeptical -- giving my opponent a 2/2 speeds up the clock quite a bit, and the fact that the Swan can chump block Emrakul is annoying.
You're playing Oath.... You want them to have a creature, that's why you play Forbidden Orchard. Swan Song allows you to give them a creature without relying on Orchard. Swan Song is one of the most situational cards. It's highly overrated. Giving them a creature is your eventual goal, but your control game is not something that you want to provide the creature. If you HAVE to use an Orchard without Oath, the 1/1's clock is manageable. If you have to cast Swan Song without Oath, you can lose the game in short order, especially to a deck with Time Walk/Snapcaster. I'd really only want Swan Song in my deck at all times for the Oath mirror in G1. That is such a small subset of times that I would be hard pressed to play more than 1 copy ever, and that 1 copy would be very hard to justify.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Char? Char you! I like the play. -Randy Bueller
I swear I'll burn the city down to show you the light.
The best part of believe is the lie
|
|
|
enderfall
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: September 15, 2014, 12:26:51 pm » |
|
Thanks guys. I agree leaving out TfK was a mistake. I'm also going to test replacing Sol Ring with Mana Crypt -- in the past, I've felt the life loss wasn't worth the extra speed, but now that Mental Misstep and Dack Fayden are everywhere Sol Ring has lost a lot of its luster.
I'll try out Swan Song, but I have to admit I'm a bit skeptical -- giving my opponent a 2/2 speeds up the clock quite a bit, and the fact that the Swan can chump block Emrakul is annoying.
You're playing Oath.... You want them to have a creature, that's why you play Forbidden Orchard. Swan Song allows you to give them a creature without relying on Orchard. Swan Song is one of the most situational cards. It's highly overrated. Giving them a creature is your eventual goal, but your control game is not something that you want to provide the creature. If you HAVE to use an Orchard without Oath, the 1/1's clock is manageable. If you have to cast Swan Song without Oath, you can lose the game in short order, especially to a deck with Time Walk/Snapcaster. I'd really only want Swan Song in my deck at all times for the Oath mirror in G1. That is such a small subset of times that I would be hard pressed to play more than 1 copy ever, and that 1 copy would be very hard to justify. I never advocated adding more than 1 Swan Song. I specifically suggested swapping out the 1 Pierce for it. The fact is Swan Song is a hard counter that can protect your Oath when you are trying to cast it at any point of the game, be it Turn 1 (with some mana acceleration) or turn 15. While claiming that Swan Song is incredibly situational, the card I advocate replacing it with is equally situational.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
H
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: September 17, 2014, 08:50:19 pm » |
|
Every time I see this thread title, I imagine I'll see a discussion of Worldgorger in Oath,  2. Impulse is not that great, but if I replace them with, say, Preordain I become dangerously low on shuffle effects. Is there a better option?
3. Right now the deck is weak against more dedicated control decks: if the deck can't force through an early bomb it has little hope in the late game. Landstill is a nightmare matchup, but fortunately few people play it on MTGO. On the other hand, MTGO appears to be infested with Dack Slaver and UR Delver builds; any advice on improving these matchups?
On point 2, Impule isn't a shuffle effect. It was misprinted to say shuffle, but was quickly errated. Does it shuffle on MTGO? I don't know, I've never played Online. I would run Preordain, -2 Impulse, -1 Top (too mana intensive), +1 TfK (Greg already explained), +2 Preordain. On point 3, I honestly don't think you can make Landstill a good matchup for Oath. At least, make it good while not tossing your other matchups out the window. I think you just have to be ready to be very fast, because once they are at 4 mana, considering how many counters they run, you almost can't possibly win, let alone if they get a Standstill.
|
|
|
Logged
|
"The Ancients teach us that if we can but last, we shall prevail." —Kaysa, Elder Druid of the Juniper Order
|
|
|
evouga
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: October 01, 2014, 12:50:20 am » |
|
(Decklist updated to the current version.)
I've started keeping track of my game record in the MTGO 2-man queues.
Merfolk: 2-0 BUG: 1-2 Dack Slaver: 5-2 Gristelbrand Oath: 4-1 Grixis Control: 6-3 Misc. Blue Control: 2-0 Dark Times: 0-2 Dredge: 0-2 Affinity Control: 2-0 Pyromancer Gush: 7-4 RUG Delver: 2-0
I'm still rusty enough that I'm making shocking blunders on a regular basis, so it's not clear if the bad showing vs. Dredge and Dark Times were mulligan/sideboarding errors, bad luck, pilot ineptitude, or weakness of the list vs. these archetypes.
What is very interesting is how blue-infested the MTGO meta is right now -- almost nobody is playing shops or dredge (at least not in the 2-man queues). The deck doesn't seem to have as terrible a matchup against midrange control or the mirror as I expected, particularly post-board.
I'm pretty happy with the list as it currently stands -- if I knew I were going to play a meta with NO shops decks (?!) I would definitely swap out Nature's Claim for more Abrupt Decays, which I like more and more the more I play them. I'm also contemplating cutting another Jace (blasphemy I know) -- he's mana intensive, bombos with Orchard, and really shines only against creature-light heavy control decks where he stands little chance of resolving in the first place. (On the other hand I definitely don't agree with cutting a Top -- it's easier to land than Jace and wins games that go long and grindy.)
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Thiim
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: October 01, 2014, 09:17:15 am » |
|
I think that you're just unlucky vs. Dredge or make some really bad calls, I don't know  since i haven't played against you  But you have a favorable MU against dredge. Especially when looking at your sideboard in G2 & G3. Dragon Oath is faster and have more hate. Nice statistic against Big Blue though 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
evouga
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: October 23, 2014, 10:38:26 pm » |
|
I've cut both Jaces for two Dig Through Times. I'm happy with the switch, as Jace was just so antisynergistic a large portion of the time.
Latest MTGO queue stats:
Aggro
Merfolk: 4-1 Humans: 3-2 Infect: 2-1 Affinity: 2-0 White Trash: 2-0
Big Blue
BUG: 3-7 Dack Slaver: 6-6 Gristelbrand Oath: 6-1 Grixis Control: 18-10 Pyromancer/"Delver": 34-40 Misc. Blue Control: 15-14
Combo
Dark Times: 0-2 Dredge: 4-4 Doomsday: 3-5 TPS: 5-6 Elves: 1-0
Shops
Kuldotha Shops: 1-4 Terra Nova: 4-1 Misc Shops: 3-3
Creative
Affinity Control: 2-0 Cloudpost Oath: 0-2 UW Underworld Dreams: 4-0 Eggs: 2-0 Pyromancer Ascension Combo: 2-0 WRB Control: 3-2 ???: 2-0
Again, it's interesting how underrepresented Shops is in the online meta. And yes, the Dragon Oath deck has a bad matchup against the current most popular deck in the format, sadly.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
serracollector
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: October 24, 2014, 02:21:13 am » |
|
I think if you ran either Echoing Truth or even Echoing Decay over repeal it could immensly help you delver matchup as well as dredge. Engineered Explosives is also great versus these two decks which seem to be your weakness. And although it may seen jank Circle of Flame is rather good right now versus all these delver decks. Remember Echoing Truth and Engineered Explosives can also nail several Cages unlike Abrupt Decay which can only hit one cage. With Love Boat allowing Delver to draw five cards every turn its not uncommon for them to get two or more Cages in play to hold your Oaths at bay. Hope that helps good luck.
|
|
|
Logged
|
B/R discussions are not allowed outside of Vintage Issues, and that includes signatures.
|
|
|
evouga
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: October 24, 2014, 12:01:11 pm » |
|
I'm not sure Echoing Truth would be useful all that often in the Delver matchup, though. If I were able to force through a 1C spell, I could just play Oath instead and win the game. The common failure mode against Delver isn't losing a race against early Pyromancer tokens -- it's running out of gas due to Delver's superior suite of countermagic and card selection spells, then losing to a single explosive Pyromancer + tons of spells + Time Walk turn.
Abrupt Decay is amazing because it is uncounterable. It pulls an incredible amount of weight, from punishing opponent who think they can turtle behind a Grafdigger's Cage and 7 counterspells, to disrupting Vault+Key, to shrugging off Chalice@anything.
Something like Volcanic Fallout would be very useful, if it had a reasonable casting cost.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|