Shazam!Last time, I approached design for Vintage from the perspective of whole sets, trying to use general trends to show how a set could be aimed at Vintage without individual cards designed for Type 1, even if the sets that came out on top were overrepresented because of a couple of cards usable in a wide variety of decks. In the forum thread after the article, I got multiple requests to look at the individual card breakdown, so that's my objective this time. (I sure hope Knutson doesn't link every single card name in this article, because that would be...a lot. About 352 different cards, actually.) [The irony here is that I linked all the cards before reading the text of the article. Heh indeed. - Knut]
