TheManaDrain.com
September 07, 2025, 10:04:22 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: [Article] More About March 1st  (Read 4322 times)
Machinus
Keldon Ancient
Full Members
Basic User
***
Posts: 2516



View Profile
« on: March 11, 2005, 01:00:56 am »

Quote from: Aaron Forsythe
We decided to announce the change six months early for two reasons. One, the cards themselves can sometimes be hard to find, and we wanted players to have time to track them down, trade for and/or buy them. Two, we wanted an extra-long window to make sure we banned and restricted the right cards from those sets, as we have no real internal resources dedicated to playing Portal cards in large constructed formats. So to all you Vintage and Legacy buffs—if you find anything ridiculous in the next few months, drop me a line using the email link at the end of the article.


http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=mtgcom/daily/af57
Logged

T1: Arsenal
Moxlotus
Teh Absolut Ballz
Full Members
Basic User
***
Posts: 2199


Where the fuck are my pants?

moxlotusgws
View Profile
« Reply #1 on: March 11, 2005, 01:54:52 am »

I emailed him and mentioned Grim Tutor.  Deathlong with Grim Tutor instead of Wish itself would only get more powerful.  3 life instead of half and Yawgmoth's Will MAINDECK.  *Stupid shit I posted deleted*

EDIT: Wow, I shouldn't post things at 1:00 in the morning.  Personal Tutor, not Cruel is restricted.
Logged

Cybernations--a free nation building game.
http://www.cybernations.net
E Face
Basic User
**
Posts: 51


flipmodes2k
View Profile
« Reply #2 on: March 11, 2005, 02:00:19 am »

So what exactly does Aaron Forsythe want us to do?

Does he want us to send him our secret tech if it is ridiculous so that they can ban it before we get a chance to prove how ridiculous our tech is in a tournament?

Or does he just want us to show him what kind of brokeness is out there for thier knowledge, not just for the sake of the B/R list? Is it that they dont want to find it themselves because its not an important issue to them right now? Does he assume that by giving us 6 months in advance to test we will act as "members" of R&D or whatever and do the work for them?

What exactly are we discussing/debating in this thread?

And one general question about Portal. (this probably has been answered) Will Horsemanship be a new mechanic or will it be erratted into something already in existence such as Flying?
Logged

Team STRONG- not really a team, more like a really really bad urban myth

http://boards1.wizards.com/showthread.php?t=269919&page=1&pp=30

Foo! U R the NOOB!!
BigChuck
Full Members
Basic User
***
Posts: 138

HowMuchCanIChuck
View Profile
« Reply #3 on: March 11, 2005, 02:07:19 am »

The Horsemanship question was in the article. Basically, Horsemanship will be the new shadow:Neither will see play.
Logged

Quote from: dandan
P.P.S. I now realise that it is possible that you have mistaken Holland for Iraq as neither have weapons of mass destruction.
Mr. Fantazy
Basic User
**
Posts: 146


mageofdreams
View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: March 11, 2005, 02:16:41 am »

I think he's alluding to things already known by the Vintage Community.

While R&D does some testing/playing of the format their knowledge is limited. It is only prudent for them to allocate most of their time and effort to the main formats. One of the benefits of this is the Vintage community seems to have alot more say in what happens in the format.

What's interesting about this is, the hint of "this is your format guys, if there is going to be a problem, let us know so it can be fixed before you get stuck with it."

It seems to me that we are being given the chance to keep Vintage healthy. It will be interesting to see how well we do.

Shawn
Logged

Dear Mr Fantazy
1040 N Tustin Street
Orange, Ca. 92867

TEAM: GOT MANA?
Innovators of F.U.B.A.R. dotDec
Vegeta2711
Bouken Desho Desho?
Full Members
Basic User
***
Posts: 1734


Nyah!

Silky172
View Profile WWW
« Reply #5 on: March 11, 2005, 02:20:36 am »

How good, they simply use us to double-check what's broken and what isn't. Honestly this was probably the best thing they could've done for portal.
Logged

Team Reflection

www.vegeta2711.deviantart.com - My art stuff!
Tristal
Full Members
Basic User
***
Posts: 233


Knocks you all down


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: March 11, 2005, 02:24:42 am »

Quote from: Moxlotus
I emailed him and mentioned Grim Tutor.  Deathlong with Grim Tutor instead of Wish itself would only get more powerful.  3 life instead of half and Yawgmoth's Will MAINDECK.  I mean, they restricted Cruel Tutor but not this?  Cruel Tutor should be almost always worse than Grim Tutor.  1 colorless instead of B, 1 life less, but card disadvantage.  I don't know why they would restrict Cruel Tutor over Grim Tutor unless it was just an oversight.


They're not restricting Cruel Tutor.
Logged

No longer a DCI Level 1 Judge.  Just a guy who likes rules knowledge.
Marton
Basic User
**
Posts: 241



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: March 11, 2005, 02:25:55 am »

Quote from: Moxlotus
I emailed him and mentioned Grim Tutor.  Deathlong with Grim Tutor instead of Wish itself would only get more powerful.  3 life instead of half and Yawgmoth's Will MAINDECK.  I mean, they restricted Cruel Tutor but not this?  Cruel Tutor should be almost always worse than Grim Tutor.  1 colorless instead of B, 1 life less, but card disadvantage.  I don't know why they would restrict Cruel Tutor over Grim Tutor unless it was just an oversight.

They restricted personal tutor, not cruel tutor. Personal tutor is a mystical tutor, in sorcery, but that can only search for sorceries. It seems to me much better than cruel tutor, which I doubt will see any play at all.
Logged
E Face
Basic User
**
Posts: 51


flipmodes2k
View Profile
« Reply #8 on: March 11, 2005, 02:31:58 am »

Thanks BigChuck, i didnt realize that the link was for a new article, I assumed  Embarassed it was the link for the email.

I agree with Mr. Fantazy's take on what the R&D is trying to do for our format. They are keeping it exactly what they call it, "our format". Type One magic is practically considered the Holy Grail of magic formats. The R&D, especially Aaron Forsythe after his attendance at SCGP9 2, knows that it is in "our" hands to keep the format healthy and fun.
Logged

Team STRONG- not really a team, more like a really really bad urban myth

http://boards1.wizards.com/showthread.php?t=269919&page=1&pp=30

Foo! U R the NOOB!!
Cross
Basic User
**
Posts: 454


Ribs+24+7
View Profile WWW
« Reply #9 on: March 11, 2005, 03:29:26 am »

Quote
What's interesting about this is, the hint of "this is your format guys, if there is going to be a problem, let us know so it can be fixed before you get stuck with it."


They already have done this with trini. If enough people whine they can get what they want.

I do feel that it was cool of them to wait awhile for them to allow people to find cards. If portal was just randomly legalized the prices for cards would have been more insane than they are now. A decent number of decks don't even run mystical and the much more terrible personal tutor is being sold on SCG for 20. Imperial seal would probably be at moxen level instead of library level price range.
Logged

the GG skwad

"109)   Cast Leeches.

110)   You win the game."
yespuhyren
Basic User
**
Posts: 727


I AM the Jester!

poolguyjason@hotmail.com
View Profile Email
« Reply #10 on: March 11, 2005, 08:50:23 am »

Quote from: Moxlotus
I emailed him and mentioned Grim Tutor.  Deathlong with Grim Tutor instead of Wish itself would only get more powerful.  3 life instead of half and Yawgmoth's Will MAINDECK.  I mean, they restricted Cruel Tutor but not this?  Cruel Tutor should be almost always worse than Grim Tutor.  1 colorless instead of B, 1 life less, but card disadvantage.  I don't know why they would restrict Cruel Tutor over Grim Tutor unless it was just an oversight.


ONLY personal tutor and imperial seal were restricted.  NOT cruel tutor

Grim tutor is great though Wink
Logged

Team Blitzkrieg:  The Vintage Lightning War.

TK: Tinker saccing Mox.
Jamison: Hard cast FoW.
TK: Ha! Tricked you! I'm out of targets
Hi-Val
Attractive and Successful
Adepts
Basic User
****
Posts: 1941


Reinforcing your negative body image

wereachedparity
View Profile
« Reply #11 on: March 11, 2005, 11:01:50 am »

Quote
There were some grumblings from players that Aether Vial was too powerful to remain legal, but it hasn't been showing up in enough winning decks to warrant action.


From the article. Just another hint that they use tournament results as part of the restriction criteria.
Logged

Team Meandeck: VOTE RON PAUL KILL YOUR PARENTS MAKE GOLD ILLEGAL

Quote from: Steve Menendian
Doug was really attractive to me.
Cyrrix_chipset
Basic User
**
Posts: 25


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: March 11, 2005, 11:41:36 am »

I love that they are saying it's our format, but am still feeling a bit cheated.  When those portal sets came out they said they would not be Tourney legal.  So being the tourney player I am I bought NONE.  now years and years later they are all of a sudden All legal.  Prices have all skyrocketed and we the tourney players get shafted.  I think they should have stuck to their guns and left them illegal or atleast show signs or promises of reprinting the UNDER printed 3 portal set that was for some reason or another not made in US.
Logged

3 pieces of power down, 6 more to go.  Mike Herbig: believe the hype.
policehq
I voted for Smmenen!
Basic User
**
Posts: 820

p0licehq
View Profile WWW
« Reply #13 on: March 11, 2005, 11:44:10 am »

Quote from: Cyrrix_chipset
I love that they are saying it's our format, but am still feeling a bit cheated.  When those portal sets came out they said they would not be Tourney legal.  So being the tourney player I am I bought NONE.  now years and years later they are all of a sudden All legal.  Prices have all skyrocketed and we the tourney players get shafted.  I think they should have stuck to their guns and left them illegal or atleast show signs or promises of reprinting the UNDER printed 3 portal set that was for some reason or another not made in US.

You'll be alright. I rarely even play Vampiric or Mystical Tutor, and sorcery versions of them are inherently worse.

Barry
Logged
Smmenen
Guest
« Reply #14 on: March 11, 2005, 01:21:34 pm »

Quote from: Moxlotus
I emailed him and mentioned Grim Tutor.  Deathlong with Grim Tutor instead of Wish itself would only get more powerful.  3 life instead of half and Yawgmoth's Will MAINDECK.  *Stupid shit I posted deleted*

EDIT: Wow, I shouldn't post things at 1:00 in the morning.  Personal Tutor, not Cruel is restricted.


Grim Tutor does not deserve restriction barely anymore than Death Wish does.
Logged
Moxlotus
Teh Absolut Ballz
Full Members
Basic User
***
Posts: 2199


Where the fuck are my pants?

moxlotusgws
View Profile
« Reply #15 on: March 11, 2005, 03:09:05 pm »

Quote from: Smmenen
Quote from: Moxlotus
I emailed him and mentioned Grim Tutor.  Deathlong with Grim Tutor instead of Wish itself would only get more powerful.  3 life instead of half and Yawgmoth's Will MAINDECK.  *Stupid shit I posted deleted*

EDIT: Wow, I shouldn't post things at 1:00 in the morning.  Personal Tutor, not Cruel is restricted.


Grim Tutor does not deserve restriction barely anymore than Death Wish does.


I didn't say it did.  His article merely said to mention any cards with potential to be powerful and Grim Tutor is one of those cards.  I just said that the potential is there, whether or not it is deserving is something different.
Logged

Cybernations--a free nation building game.
http://www.cybernations.net
policehq
I voted for Smmenen!
Basic User
**
Posts: 820

p0licehq
View Profile WWW
« Reply #16 on: March 11, 2005, 04:57:33 pm »

Quote from: Smmenen
Quote from: Moxlotus
I emailed him and mentioned Grim Tutor.  Deathlong with Grim Tutor instead of Wish itself would only get more powerful.  3 life instead of half and Yawgmoth's Will MAINDECK.  *Stupid shit I posted deleted*

EDIT: Wow, I shouldn't post things at 1:00 in the morning.  Personal Tutor, not Cruel is restricted.


Grim Tutor does not deserve restriction barely anymore than Death Wish does.

The synnergy with Yawgmoth's Will is insane.
1) If it's countered, you still have a chance to draw Yawgmoth's Will.
2) Once it resolves, it is not removed from the game, so it can be cast again with Yawgmoth's Will.
3) Unless you're at less than 6 life, you will lose less life than you would with Death Wish.
4) Death Wish = 4 copies of Yawgmoth's Will. Grim Tutor = 6 [at least] copies of Yawgmoth's Will (including Demonic Tutor and Will itself).

It needs to be restricted before ugly things happen. I don't really know what Stax decks are going to look like without the 3 extra Trinisphere, but if combo learns to play around Sphere of Resistance, Grim Tutor and Yawgmoth's Will are going to be broken.

Barry
Logged
That0neguy
Basic User
**
Posts: 163

none none none
View Profile
« Reply #17 on: March 12, 2005, 12:40:34 am »

Quote from: Smmenen

Grim Tutor does not deserve restriction barely anymore than Death Wish does.


Hmmmmm could someone have a hidden agenda???

JK but it seriously probbably doesn't need to be restricted because it still requires quite a bit of mana to go supper insane with (3BBBB without a lotus led or petal)  If make another stupidly good mana producer like LED it needs to go otherwise I think it is safe to at least allow it to be played for at least a couple months in tournements before we see if it actually needs the axe.
Logged
Smmenen
Guest
« Reply #18 on: March 12, 2005, 12:56:47 am »

Quote from: policehq
Quote from: Smmenen
Quote from: Moxlotus
I emailed him and mentioned Grim Tutor.  Deathlong with Grim Tutor instead of Wish itself would only get more powerful.  3 life instead of half and Yawgmoth's Will MAINDECK.  *Stupid shit I posted deleted*

EDIT: Wow, I shouldn't post things at 1:00 in the morning.  Personal Tutor, not Cruel is restricted.


Grim Tutor does not deserve restriction barely anymore than Death Wish does.

The synnergy with Yawgmoth's Will is insane.
1) If it's countered, you still have a chance to draw Yawgmoth's Will.
2) Once it resolves, it is not removed from the game, so it can be cast again with Yawgmoth's Will.
3) Unless you're at less than 6 life, you will lose less life than you would with Death Wish.
4) Death Wish = 4 copies of Yawgmoth's Will. Grim Tutor = 6 [at least] copies of Yawgmoth's Will (including Demonic Tutor and Will itself).

It needs to be restricted before ugly things happen. I don't really know what Stax decks are going to look like without the 3 extra Trinisphere, but if combo learns to play around Sphere of Resistance, Grim Tutor and Yawgmoth's Will are going to be broken.

Barry


Will it produce a viable deck?  Sure.  Does that mean it deserves restriction?  No.
Logged
Mana Duane
Basic User
**
Posts: 20



View Profile
« Reply #19 on: March 12, 2005, 02:28:43 am »

Has anyone considered what the changes mean for the future of Yawgmoth's Will? I believe that there is a critical number of playable tutors, beyond which the format becomes very difficult to control because there are enough good ways to tutor for restricted cards. With portal we gain Personal, Imperial Seal and Grim tutor. Assuming for the moment that grim gets the axe, we then have 6 playable tutors (VT, MT, DT, plus the three portal tutors). With Will itself that is 7. It must make the case for banning Yawg Will a lot stonger.

James
Logged
E Face
Basic User
**
Posts: 51


flipmodes2k
View Profile
« Reply #20 on: March 12, 2005, 03:37:17 am »

Quote
It must make the case for banning Yawg Will a lot stonger.


Are we at that point in Type One when one must start to say that Yawg's Win is just as noteworthy as the other pillars of the format? Yawgmoth's Will is just one of those cards that can't simply be banned because it is the Holy Grail of combo decks. Not only that, but the Will is found in many many other decks, making it just as important to the format as say Mana Drain, Workshop, and Fow...

While I do agree that Yawgmoth's Will is supremely broken, I just dont see any reason why it should be banned. Vintage is the home of broken cards, the format where sometimes one spell should just win you the game. Vintage is the format we play to play with our cards, not to ban them.
Logged

Team STRONG- not really a team, more like a really really bad urban myth

http://boards1.wizards.com/showthread.php?t=269919&page=1&pp=30

Foo! U R the NOOB!!
ChaosTheory
Basic User
**
Posts: 45



View Profile
« Reply #21 on: March 12, 2005, 06:43:43 am »

I'm glad they waited to legalize Portal and it's friends, especially since as said in the article, some of these cards are hard to find.
Imperial seal may just be one of those cards that I'll always proxy. The price on it is ridiculous now.
Anybody know if they're planning to reprint any of the sets like Portal: 3 Kingdoms to make them more accessible to us?
Logged

Team Dead Deck
Quote from: Revvik
At one point I had to make the choice of fixing the brakes on my car, or buying a signed/altered Ancestral Recall.  Guess which I spent my money on.
And everyone else has brakes.  I've been fine so far!
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.045 seconds with 17 queries.