Hi, I'm sorry, but to be frank, I don't see how adding Bazaar and Loam is a 'cutting edge' addition to Oath and Vintage. Â In a deck that wants to poop out a 6/* on turn 2 and end the game 2 turns later, I just don't see the advantage of adding a psuedo crucible lock. Â If you have played Oath and Oath up Akroma, isn't your main goal to protect it for a couple of turns and just not care about their board position like you would with a different kind of archetype, like stax or something? Â
Bazaar/Loam is powerful and I'm sure it is powerful in this deck. Â Just not powerful enough. Â If I were to maximize this draw engine, I would seriously want to have Squees. Â And, if I were to build an Oath deck, I would really want it to beat the mirror. Â It doesn't look like this one would because your landkill just isn't fast enough.
If you'll kindly refrain from crucifying me for posting this aim convo, I think you'll find some food for thought in it. I did.
EDIT: I'm bogr42. Don't ask.
[20:10] pipwizo: loam itself is nearly useless early on too
[20:10] bogr42: it's a hell of a lot better than squee
[20:10] pipwizo: a valid point
[20:10] pipwizo: sorta
[20:11] bogr42: the only reason squee/bazaar isn't a valid oath strategy right now that is that, you know. they're creatures
[20:11] pipwizo: I just don't see any advantage over the other bazaar decks
[20:12] bogr42: you shouldn't be trying to. I think the question you ought to be asking
[20:12] bogr42: is whether it can perform better than normal oath
[20:12] pipwizo: is if it's better than anything else out there
[20:12] bogr42: with its asstacular ak engine
[20:12] pipwizo: ...
[20:12] pipwizo: the last time somebody played AK in oath
[20:12] pipwizo: was like january
[20:12] bogr42: What does it use these days?
[20:13] pipwizo: impulse/brainstorm/tfk/ sensei
[20:13] bogr42: so in other words it uses sexier versions of scroll rack
[20:13] pipwizo: lol
[20:13] bogr42: I think that's a Bad Thing
[20:14] pipwizo: just check out some of the modern listsd
[20:15] bogr42: Are the modern lists anything like the one I lost to BadStax with?
[20:15] bogr42: and then proceeded to lose to extended affinty?
[20:15] pipwizo: dunno
[20:15] bogr42: *affinity
[20:16] pipwizo:
http://sales.starcitygames.com/deckdatabase/displaydeck.php?DeckID=14157[20:16] bogr42: you were running the horrible build with suppression field and you kept kicking my ass remember?
[20:16] pipwizo:
http://sales.starcitygames.com/deckdatabase/displaydeck.php?DeckID=14158[20:16] pipwizo: didn't have supression field
[20:16] pipwizo: had root maze
[20:16] bogr42: ah yeah
[20:16] bogr42: I remember maze being in it
[20:17] bogr42: I'm probably mixing it up with the deck that took 131st place out of 140 people
[20:17] bogr42: kevin cron I think
[20:17] pipwizo: yeah
[20:18] pipwizo: the thing I really don't like about your list is your draw engines lack of immediacy
[20:19] bogr42: I think I see what you're getting at but clarify further
[20:19] pipwizo: you're restricted to 4 threats, while dragon has 6 or 7
[20:19] pipwizo: that's the best comarison I can make
[20:19] pipwizo: so bazaar is more effective there
[20:19] pipwizo: because it can dig very quickly to a threat
[20:19] bogr42: I again urge you to compare it to other oath decks rather than other bazaar decks
[20:20] pipwizo: I'm giving you reasons why the bazaar engine isn't effective here
[20:20] pipwizo: first thing I'd do with your list
[20:20] bogr42: it's better than bloody portent varients
[20:20] pipwizo: -3 seal
[20:20] bogr42: I mean that's just sad
[20:20] pipwizo: +3 duress
[20:21] bogr42: which means enlightened goes
[20:21] pipwizo: vamp
[20:21] bogr42: right
[20:21] pipwizo: I'd adjust your manabase to utilize choke too
[20:21] bogr42: I was thinking about choke and it's marvelous uses
[20:22] pipwizo: sarcasm?
[20:22] bogr42: not
[20:22] pipwizo: ok
[20:22] pipwizo: cause choke is the cats nuts
[20:22] bogr42: as opposed to the bee's leg joints
[20:23] pipwizo: I don't see what's so wrong with portent variants
[20:24] pipwizo: especially given your history in utilizing them
[20:24] pipwizo: you're perfectly aware of their effectiveness in high concentration
[20:24] bogr42: As much as I love my cantrips 'n shit
[20:24] bogr42: and you're right, I do have this huge fondness for them
[20:25] bogr42: which blinds me to simpler solutions sometimes
[20:25] bogr42: They're tutors
[20:25] bogr42: not draw
[20:25] pipwizo: well think of it like this
[20:25] bogr42: viva la difference
[20:25] pipwizo: instead of 4 bazaar and 4 loam
[20:25] pipwizo: you're running 8 cantrips
[20:26] pipwizo: instead of 4 cards that let you dig
[20:26] bogr42: mind you I'm already running brainstorm
[20:26] pipwizo: and 4 that enable CA creation
[20:26] pipwizo: you get 8 that dig
[20:26] pipwizo: I'm aware of that
[20:26] pipwizo: oath could give two shits about card advantage most of the time
[20:27] pipwizo: it only needs 1 card to resolve
[20:27] bogr42: because it's a combo-control deck
[20:27] pipwizo: most of the time the rest is just cake
[20:27] bogr42: they all are
[20:27] bogr42: that's the problem
[20:27] bogr42: if you want to take that logic to it's conclusion then gifts has little use for all it's draw paraphanlia because it only needs one card to resolve
[20:28] bogr42: *paraphanalia
[20:28] bogr42: (sp?)
[20:28] pipwizo: *coughMDGsuckscough*
[20:28] bogr42: mdg
[20:28] bogr42: :blank:
[20:28] pipwizo: the good gifts variants trade 1 for 1 or worse
[20:28] pipwizo: meandeck gifts
[20:29] bogr42: oh
[20:29] bogr42: shoulda caught that
[20:29] pipwizo: gifts did cut it's draw paraphernailia
[20:29] pipwizo: it went from 4 gifts, 4 scroll 4 brainstorm 1 fact 1 ancestral
[20:30] pipwizo: to 4 tfk 2 gifts 4 brainstorm 1 ancestral
[20:30] bogr42: so it cut six draw slots
[20:30] pipwizo: because it only needs 1 card to resolve
[20:30] bogr42: misd I'm assuming still sucks
[20:30] pipwizo: yep
[20:31] bogr42: what came in for the missing slots? Belcher I'm assuming, and... what?
[20:31] pipwizo: duress
[20:31] bogr42: gorilla shaman?
[20:31] pipwizo: pithing needle
[20:31] pipwizo: shaman
[20:31] pipwizo: a few still run 1 or 2 merchant scrolls
[20:32] pipwizo: but those are the minority
[20:32] bogr42: where was I
[20:32] bogr42: something occured to me
[20:32] bogr42: oh yeah
[20:32] bogr42: oath only has to resolve one card yes?
[20:32] pipwizo: yeah
[20:33] bogr42: Ok, tell me this
[20:33] bogr42: in normal oath, is intuition a must counter?
[20:33] pipwizo: normal oath =?
[20:34] bogr42: by normal I mean "other"
[20:34] pipwizo: they don't run intuition
[20:34] bogr42: let me put it this way
[20:34] bogr42: as it's much more apt
[20:34] pipwizo: in MD oath it depends on the situation
[20:35] bogr42: forget what I just said, what I meant was: Do they have support cards that are as powerful as intuition is in bazaar oath?
[20:35] pipwizo: chalice, choke, needle(sometimes)
[20:35] bogr42: md
[20:35] pipwizo: no one plays MD oath
[20:35] bogr42: I meant maindeck
[20:35] pipwizo: oh
[20:35] pipwizo: chalice, needle, tutors
[20:36] pipwizo: null rod
[20:36] pipwizo: TFK
[20:36] bogr42: intuition is like most of those wrapped into one card
[20:37] bogr42: letting intuition resolve is like letting curcible/strip AND thirst for knowledge resolve
[20:37] pipwizo: then how about you go to 1 loam and 1 bazaar
[20:37] bogr42: that's actually a really interesting idea
[20:37] pipwizo: hmm
[20:37] pipwizo: that is aninteresting idea
[20:38] bogr42: obv you'd go up to four intuitions
[20:38] pipwizo: or giftsd
[20:39] bogr42: Here's a thought dude
[20:40] bogr42: take gifts, go -red?, +green, +1 bazaar, loam, and strip
[20:40] pipwizo: mebbe
[20:40] bogr42: also regrowth to sort of make up for the loss of recoup
[20:40] bogr42: wish you can't really get around though
[20:40] pipwizo: hmm
[20:40] pipwizo: I'll look into this some more
[20:40] pipwizo: dunno if oath is the best shell for this