TheManaDrain.com
September 22, 2025, 04:56:48 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: [Article] May/June 2009 LARGE-scale Metagame Report  (Read 4897 times)
Troy_Costisick
Full Members
Basic User
***
Posts: 1804


View Profile WWW Email
« on: August 04, 2009, 04:31:13 am »

Heya,

Last week I did a report on the small-scale Vintage metagame for May and June of 2009. Due to a flood of very interesting topics he’d rather write about, Stephen Menendian asked me to do a write-up about the large-scale metagame for the same bi-monthly period. I agreed, and so for these two months and these two months only, I’ll be reporting on the results of the big tournaments. I hope that I am able to produce a report that meets the standard he sets. It will probably be briefer than Steve’s usual reports since much of what I said in the small-scale meta report (link here: ) is also true of the large-scale meta. The important thing about this bi-montly report is that it’s the last one prior to the June 2009 B/R changes. It also marks one full year since the “apocalypse” when Gush and Flash were restricted. Anyway, here we go-

The May/June Metgame Top 8 Breakdown by Archetype:

There were 13 tournaments reported with 33 or more players (at least 6 rounds of Swiss) for a total of 103 decks. One deck was not reported. Here are the top 8 results by Archetype:

27 Tez Control (1,1,1,1,1,1,2,2,2,3,3,3,3,3,3,5,5,5,5,6,6,6,6,7,7,7,8) [includes 2 Remora Tez, 2 Tezless Tez, and 2 Toughtcast Tez]
12 Ichorid (1,2,2,3,4,7,7,7,8,8,8,8)
8 MUD (1,2,4,4,4,5,7,7)
7 Remora Control (1,2,2,2,3,5,5)
4 Stax (1,2,4,6)
4 Drain Tendrils (1,6,8,8)
4 Euro Control (3,3,4,5)
4 BUG Fish (5,5,7,8)
4 UR Fish (2,2,5,8)
4 Oath (3,4,4,8)
3 Painter Combo (2,4,5)
2 ANT (3,7)
2 TPS (3,5)
2 Bomberman (6,7)
2 Suicide Black (5,7)
2 Pitch Long (3,7)
1 Drain Freeze (1)
1 Faeries (1)
1 Selkie Strike
1 Grow
1 Merfolk
1 Stiflenought
1 Etherium Workshop
1 Long.dec
1 RBW Agro
1 UW Fish

Remarks:

-Tez decks dominated once again, however they did receive a bit of a challenge from Drain Tendrils. Looking back on Steve’s last report, there were only two Drain Trendrils lists that made the top 8. This marks a massive upswing in that archetypes performance and one that Steve predicted last year [http://www.starcitygames.com/magic/vintage/15991_So_Many_Insane_Plays_The_Vintage_Apocalypse_The_New_Metagame_Uncovered.html]. We’ll see if Drain Tendrils sticks around or was just a flash in the pan that no one saw coming.

-After nearly vanishing from the top 8 in the last report, Oath returns with 4 entries. That represents a 400% improvement from last time. However, Control Slaver is gone completely. I doubt it will ever return thanks to the restriction of Thirst for Knowledge. Maybe with Strategic Planning or Careful Consideration, but I highly doubt it. That’s a sad thing for me. I hate to see an archetype vanish like that, especially if it’s one the DCI wasn’t even targeting with its B/R announcement.

-The last thing I want to highlight is the emergence of some unexpected aggro decks. Faeries, Merfolk, Suicide Black, and Selkies all made the top 8. Could they be the new Goblins and Elves? Lorwyn/Shadowmoor Block added a multitude of powerful tribal cards that dominated Standard over the last two years. It’s interesting that those cards may be filtering all the way down to Vintage. We’ll see if these decks pop up again once the meta sorts itself out post-GenCon.

The number of decks that make the top 8 in each bi-monthly report will vary depending upon the number of tournaments. So sheer numbers don’t give a complete picture. Instead, it is helpful to look at percentages. Here is the percentage breakdown of the top 8 by archetype for May/June 2009:

Tez Control: 26%
Ichorid 11.6%
MUD: 7.8%
Remora Control: 6.7
The Field: 43.1%

Remarks:

-Moving up from 30% in the last report, The Field grew to 42% of the metagame. Any archetype getting less than 5% of the top 8 pie I put in “The Field” category. I interpret this increase to mean that people were trying anything they could to unseat Tez control these last two months. Obviously, it didn’t work. Tez decks took a share of the top 8 twice the size of the next best performing archetype. Just for historical reference, Gush decks- AS AN ENGINE- only made up 25% of the top 8 at their peak. Just think about that. One archetype performed better than an entire “pillar” of the format. It beat GAT, Gush Tendrils, Next Level Doomsday, Tyrant Oath, and MSPaint combined! That is absolutely astounding!

-Ichorid dropped about four percentage points from its last showing. I noticed a greater percentage of decks featuring Leyline of the Void over Yixlid Jailer (or playing both) according to Morphling.de. IMHO, Leyline is a much better Ichorid Hate card than Jailer, so when the number of Leylines go up, I expect the number of Ichorid decks making the top 8 to go down. However, Ichorid is performing quite well and is still a force to be reckoned with. Ignore it at your own peril.

The May/June Metgame Top 8 Breakdown by Engine:

In my small-scale report I call engines “pillars” to match Tom LaPille’s terminology. However, Stephen has used the word engine for a long time and since I am just the sub this time around, I will keep with his tradition. The top 8 percentage breakdown by engine is as follows:

Mana Drain: 45.6%
Null Rod: 14.6%
Workshop: 12.6%
Bazaar: 11.6%
Dark Ritual: 8.7%
Other: 6.7%

Remarks:

-I know you’re thinking the same thing I am. No change here. Mana Drains tripled-up on the next best engine thanks in part to the surge by Drain Tendrils. This is a feat never accomplished by cards like Gush or Flash. There is a whopping 31% difference between first and second place. On average, almost half of any top 8 in a 33+ man tournament will feature drain decks. Throw in 1 Rod deck and 1 Shop deck and Bazzars, Rituals, and Other have to fight for the last two open positions.

-The 45.6% take of the top 8 for Drains represents a modest 3% gain from the previous report. That’s probably within the margin for error, but the fact that you can go back to the July/August report of 2008 (prior to Tez, Inkwell, and Time Vault errata) and see that Drain decks made up nearly 37% of the top 8 metagame is testament to its dominance. For one full year, Mana Drain has been the top engine and has at least doubled up on the next best thing.

-Real quickly, some thoughts on Tez and Time Vault. There’s a lot of people who want to blame Time Vault for Mana Drain’s dominance. The numbers I cited above suggest that people are misplacing their blame. At best, Time Vault made about an 8% difference and that’s excluding any effect Tezzeret the Seeker and Inkwell Leviathan had on the metagame. Time Vault is not and has not been the problem. Hell, even Mana Drain is not the problem. The B/R decisions of June 2008 was the problem, and I don’t believe it has been corrected by the June 2009 decisions.

The May/June Metgame Tournament Winner Breakdown by Archetype:

Making the top 8 in a large tournament is an exhilarating achievement. It gives you a sense of accomplishment and sometimes can result in some nifty prizes. However, the big money is in winning the tournaments, and that’s where we see where the best decks truly are. The winners by archetype for this report are:

Tez Control: 6 wins
Drain Tendrils: 1 Win
Remora Control: 1 Win
Ichorid: 1 Win
MUD: 1 WinStax: 1 Win
Drain Freeze: 1 Win
Faeries: 1 Win

And a breakdown by percentage goes like this:

Tez Control: 46.2%
All Others: 7.7% each

Remarks:

-Fish continued to languish. There were no wins for Fish in this report nor in the last one. In fact, I had to go back to January/February 2009 report to find any wins for Fish decks. This has changes since recent the B/R announcement, but it means that Fish went nealy 5 months without a win. That’s a long dry spell.

-One can think of Drain Freeze as an extension of Drain Tendrils giving that archetype three wins and a 23% share of the top 8, but if you do, Tez still won twice as many tournaments as the next best archetype. It only made up 26% of the top 8 but makes up 46% of the winners. During the May/June 2009 era, if you wanted to win, you pretty much had to play Tez. Nothing else performed nearly as consistently. For me personally, I prefer my metagames to be diverse and uncertain. These numbers for Tez are pretty disgusting from that point of view, but not nearly as disgusting as the next set.

The May/June Metgame Tournament Winner Breakdown by Engine:

The number of wins by each engine for May/June was:

Mana Drain: 9 Wins
Workshop: 2 Wins
Bazaar: 1 Win
Other: 1 Win
Null Rod: 0 Wins
Dark Ritual: 0 Wins

And a breakdown by percentage looks like this:

Mana Drain: 69.2%
Workshop: 15.4%
Bazaar: 7.7%
Other: 7.7%
Null Rod: 0%
Dark Ritual: 0%

Remarks:

-Improving from the last report Workshop decks managed to win a couple tournaments. I’m a little surprised to see MUD making the top 8 so much with all the artifact hate going around. It’s a good thing though, IMO.

-The real story (surprise, surprise) was Mana Drain. It took over 69% of the wins! I regard 13 tournaments as a relatively small sample, but it’s still enough to get a solid feel for what’s going on out there. One almost has to admire the utter domination of Mana Drain. It’s certainly of historic proportions and something that will be discussed for years and years to come. It’s legendary. It really is. Hasn’t it been since the Keeper or Academy days since we’ve seen something like this?

-The funny thing is, 69.2% is actually a decline from the last report. In March/April, Mana Drain decks won 11 tournaments or 73.3% of all tournaments by my count. Those who fear Gush and/or Flash being unrestricted, please explain to me how they were EVER more broken than this?

Now, I’ve been somewhat negative on Tez and Drain decks in this article. I don’t want anyone who plays those decks to think I’m disparaging them. Nope. I think they made the best decision and deck choice for this metagame. The point is to win. Drain decks, and Tez decks specifically, win. Choosing anything else is rolling the dice. Drain decks were the only really logical choice and have been for 12 consecutive months. I say “Bravo!” to all those who have been playing and winning with Mana Drain. However, it is my personal desire to see the metagame shift to something different and more diverse. It’s happened a little bit already. There’s some nascent Fish builds that are doing well. We’ll see if it continues now that TFK is out of the mix and Enlightened Tutor and Crop Rotation are in.

Thanks for reading. I know there’s not much to respond to in an article like this, but if you have any questions, I‘ll be happy to try to answer them. Steve’s the real expert, so Steve, you’re welcome to chime in with anything. Until next time,

Peace,

-Troy

Sources:

http://morphling.de/top8decks.php?id=1050
Philadelphia 09.05.2009, 55 Players, Remora Tez Won

http://morphling.de/top8decks.php?id=1051
Annecy, 351 players, MUD Won

http://morphling.de/top8decks.php?id=1057
Catalan Vintage League 09.05.2009, 70 players, Drain Tendrils Won

http://morphling.de/top8decks.php?id=1061
Blue Bell 23.05.2009, 33 players, Tez Won

http://morphling.de/top8decks.php?id=1063
LVV 5, 36 players, Drain Tendrils Won

http://morphling.de/top8decks.php?id=1064
Lega WL #10, 40 players, Tez Won

http://morphling.de/top8decks.php?id=1065
Zurich, 50 players, Ichorid Won

http://morphling.de/top8decks.php?id=1071
Philadelphia 06.06.2009, 65 players, Stax Won

http://morphling.de/top8decks.php?id=1072
Madrid 31.05.2009, 46 players, Drain Freeze Won

http://morphling.de/top8decks.php?id=1076
Breda, 42 players, Tez Won

http://morphling.de/top8decks.php?id=1079
Madrid 14.06.2009, 38 players, Thoughtcast Tez Won

http://morphling.de/top8decks.php?id=1080
Catalan Vintage League 14.06.2009, 58 players, Tez Won

http://morphling.de/top8decks.php?id=1086
Boulder, 40 players, Faeries Won (one deck missing)
« Last Edit: September 17, 2009, 05:09:18 pm by Troy_Costisick » Logged

Harlequin
Full Members
Basic User
***
Posts: 1860


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: August 04, 2009, 09:45:06 am »


I don't really like trying to compartmentalize decks as either A or B.  When most vintage decks are clearly blends of two concepts

I can't get on Morphling from work, so these numbers were guesses.  If someone wants to check my work against actual decks, that could be really useful.  But the idea would be to identify decks by what pillars they use, and what win conditions they run.  So for example:

# Deck Name - Pillars | Win Conditions
-----------------------------------------
27 Tezz - Force + Drain | Tinker, TV
13 DT - Force + Draid + Dark Rit | Tinker, TV, Storm
12 Ichorid - Bazaar | Misc Combo
8 MUD - Shops | Misc Combo, Beats
4 Stax - Shops | Tinker? Prison
4 BUG - Force + Rod | Beats
4 UR - Force + Rod | Beats
4 Oath - Force + ? | Misc Combo, TV?
3 Painter - Force + Drain | Misc Combo, Tinker, TV?
2 ANT - Rit | Storm, TV?
2 TPS - Force + Drain | Tinker, Beats, Misc Combo, TV?
2 Bomber - Force + Rit | Storm, Tinker, TV?
2 Sui - Rit | Beats
2 PLong - Force + Rit | Storm, Tinker, TV?
1 DFreeze - Force + Drains? | Storm, Tinker, TV?
1 Faries - Force + Drains? | Beats
1 Selkie - Force + Rod | Beats
1 Grow - Force + Rod | Beats
1 Merfolk - Force + Drains? Rod | Beats
1 Naught - Force | Beats, Tinker,  Misc Combo, TV?
1 Remora - Force + Drain | Tinker, TV
1 Eth - Shop + Force? | Beats, Tinker, TV?
1 TMWA - Rod | Beats
1 Selkie - Force + Rod | Beats

Broken Down by "Pillars"
Force of Will - 27 13 4 4 4 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 1
Drain - 27 13 3 2 1
Workshops - 8 4 1
Bazaar - 12
Dark Ritual - 13 2 2 2 2
Null Rod - 4 4 1 1 1

65 of 103 decks used Force
46 of 103 decks used Drain
21 of 103 decks used Dark Ritual
13 of 103 decks used shops
12 of 103 decks used Bazaar

A total of 157 "pillars" were used by 103 decks
40% of pillars chosen were Force
29% of pillars chosen were Drain
13% of pillars chosen were Rits
8% of pillars chosen were Shops
8% of pillars chosen were Bazaars


Win Conditions:

Tinker - 27 13 4 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 1
TV+(Key/Tezz) - 27 13 1
TV? - 4 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 1
Beats - 8 4 4 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Storm - 13 2 2 2 1
Hard lock - 4
Misc Combo - 12 8 3 2 1

57 of 103 decks ran Tinker
41 of 103 decks ran Timevault + either Tezz or Key
*18 more decks could have been running TV, but I cant check.
28 of 103 decks had a viable 'beats' plan
20 of 103 decks had a Storm based plan
4 of 103 decks had a "lock" plan
26 of 103 decks had a 2-3 card-combo plan this includes "dredge" as a card-combo.

A total of 166 win conditions were used by 103 decks
34% of win conditions were Tinker
25% of win conditions were Timevault (not counting the 18)
17% of win conditions were "Beats"
12% of win conditions were Storm
2% of win conditions were Hard Lock
15% of win conditions were 'other' 2-3 card combos
Logged

Member of Team ~ R&D ~
scifiantihero
Basic User
**
Posts: 47


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: August 04, 2009, 02:15:31 pm »

The deck that you called "Faeries" (and technically called itself faeries) is being discussed as a fish-type deck in the primer on this forum.  Would this make you consider revising the report to give fish a win?  What made you consider that particular deck list to be different enough from fish to merit its own category?

: )
Logged
Smmenen
2007 Vintage World Champion
Adepts
Basic User
****
Posts: 6392


Smmenen
View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: August 04, 2009, 02:56:08 pm »

I would label Faeries as a Fish variant.

The distinction I will be using in the future is Beats v. Fish to describe all of the Null Rod decks.    Fish are the Null Rod decks that run blue.   Beats are the non-blue Null Rod decks.   Sometimes Fish decks use green, but not always.   
Logged

Troy_Costisick
Full Members
Basic User
***
Posts: 1804


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #4 on: August 04, 2009, 03:18:03 pm »

The deck that you called "Faeries" (and technically called itself faeries) is being discussed as a fish-type deck in the primer on this forum.  Would this make you consider revising the report to give fish a win?  What made you consider that particular deck list to be different enough from fish to merit its own category?

: )

Here is the cardlist for the deck you mention:

1 Black Lotus
1 Engineered Explosives
1 Mox Jet
1 Mox Pearl
1 Mox Sapphire
1 Pithing Needle
1 Relic of Progenitus
1 Sensei's Divining Top
1 Sol Ring
4 Dark Confidant
1 Demonic Tutor
1 Diabolic Edict
2 Duress
2 Thoughtseize
1 Vampiric Tutor
1 Ancestral Recall
1 Brainstorm
4 Force of Will
4 Spellstutter Sprite
2 Stifle
1 Time Walk
3 Trinket Mage
3 Vendilion Clique
3 Aven Mindcensor

Lands (18):
2 Flooded Strand
1 Island
3 Polluted Delta
1 Scrubland
1 Strip Mine
1 Swamp
2 Tundra
3 Underground Sea
4 Wasteland

Sideboard

2 Bitterblossom
1 Damnation
1 Darkblast
1 Energy Flux
3 Ethersworn Canonist
1 Hurkyl's Recall
1 Seal of Cleansing
2 Swords to Plowshares
3 Yixlid Jailer

There are several reasons I did not tag this deck as a "Fish" deck.  First, traditional Fish decks run Null Rod.  This deck does not.  Second, it tries to play somewhat on the synergies of the Faerie creature type though it doesn't take full advantage of it.  Never-the-less, the creature type is important to the build.  Third, the builder of the deck chose to call it a Faeries deck over labeling it a Fish deck, so that told me he was trying to point out significant differences.  Finally, I believe there is way too strong of a tendancy to label any non-Goblins/non-MUD aggro deck as a "Fish" deck.  I think the most agregious instance of this was people labeling GW decks as "Fish" after Steve went out of his way in his article to state that it was not.  Fish is getting to be so broad of a catagory that it's begining to lose any meaning IMHO.  Saying you played a Fish deck in a tournament doesn't tell the person you're talking to much about it at all.  If you don't agree with my labels, that's cool.  We can debate deck names forever.  To me, it seemed that the designer of the Faeries deck was trying to do something different from most Fish builds, and I wanted to recognize that in my article.

Peace,

-Troy
« Last Edit: August 04, 2009, 03:22:53 pm by Troy_Costisick » Logged

zeus-online
Adepts
Basic User
****
Posts: 1807


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: August 04, 2009, 06:54:06 pm »

There are several reasons I did not tag this deck as a "Fish" deck.  First, traditional Fish decks run Null Rod.  This deck does not.  Second, it tries to play somewhat on the synergies of the Faerie creature type though it doesn't take full advantage of it.  Never-the-less, the creature type is important to the build.  Third, the builder of the deck chose to call it a Faeries deck over labeling it a Fish deck, so that told me he was trying to point out significant differences.  Finally, I believe there is way too strong of a tendancy to label any non-Goblins/non-MUD aggro deck as a "Fish" deck.  I think the most agregious instance of this was people labeling GW decks as "Fish" after Steve went out of his way in his article to state that it was not.  Fish is getting to be so broad of a catagory that it's begining to lose any meaning IMHO.  Saying you played a Fish deck in a tournament doesn't tell the person you're talking to much about it at all.  If you don't agree with my labels, that's cool.  We can debate deck names forever.  To me, it seemed that the designer of the Faeries deck was trying to do something different from most Fish builds, and I wanted to recognize that in my article.

Actually that would be against the rules! That said, i agree with alot of what you said.
I'd label it as Faerie-Fish to be honest. To me Fish is merely blue-based Aggro/Control, so anything that is not blue would not qualify.
Logged

The truth is an elephant described by three blind men.
Smmenen
2007 Vintage World Champion
Adepts
Basic User
****
Posts: 6392


Smmenen
View Profile WWW
« Reply #6 on: September 16, 2009, 10:43:28 pm »


65 of 103 decks used Force

I counted 69 Force decks.  


Troy, the July/August metagame report is almost finished!  Thanks for your work here!
Logged

LotusHead
Full Members
Basic User
***
Posts: 2785


Team Vacaville


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: September 17, 2009, 03:49:39 am »

Thanks for the wonderful thread.

Were there really only 13 33+ Vintage Tournies posted on the intarwebs?

That is sad.  My meta has often 20+ players, sometimes <20 players, but we are an isolated meta.  I had just assumed that there were more 33+ tournies worldwide.

EDIT: This was just may/june. whew.  All is well!

Thanks for breakdown!

Logged

Troy_Costisick
Full Members
Basic User
***
Posts: 1804


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #8 on: September 17, 2009, 06:31:16 am »


65 of 103 decks used Force

I counted 69 Force decks.  


Troy, the July/August metagame report is almost finished!  Thanks for your work here!

No problem!  It was a pleasure. Smile

Peace,

-Troy
Logged

Smmenen
2007 Vintage World Champion
Adepts
Basic User
****
Posts: 6392


Smmenen
View Profile WWW
« Reply #9 on: September 17, 2009, 03:02:41 pm »

Troy,

There is one glitch that if you can fix will greatly help out.

I noticed this before, but you are calling things "drain tendrils" that are not, or that I have labled differently.  Specifically, I think you are calling the Remora Control deck "Drain Tendrils."

Typically, I have only called decks "Drain Tendrils" that use the Intuition AK engine, like the deck that Codi Vinci used to play, or in Europe they call T1T, and it wins with Tinker or Tendrils.   

Could you go through and fix that?  Or else I'll have to.
Logged

Troy_Costisick
Full Members
Basic User
***
Posts: 1804


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #10 on: September 17, 2009, 04:38:07 pm »

Troy,

There is one glitch that if you can fix will greatly help out.

I noticed this before, but you are calling things "drain tendrils" that are not, or that I have labled differently.  Specifically, I think you are calling the Remora Control deck "Drain Tendrils."

Typically, I have only called decks "Drain Tendrils" that use the Intuition AK engine, like the deck that Codi Vinci used to play, or in Europe they call T1T, and it wins with Tinker or Tendrils.   

Could you go through and fix that?  Or else I'll have to.

Okay, I fixed everything that dealt with Remora.  But there are a few decks I still have some questions about.  What would you call these:

Adrià Galitó 3rd place deck http://morphling.de/top8decks.php?id=1057
Marius Morger 4th place deck http://morphling.de/top8decks.php?id=1065
Rubén González’s 3rd place deck http://morphling.de/top8decks.php?id=1080
Guillem Ragull’s 8th place deck http://morphling.de/top8decks.php?id=1080

I labeled them as Drain Tendrils decks but they lack the Intuition/AK engine you talk about.  What would you call them?

Peace,

-Troy
Logged

Smmenen
2007 Vintage World Champion
Adepts
Basic User
****
Posts: 6392


Smmenen
View Profile WWW
« Reply #11 on: September 17, 2009, 04:41:46 pm »

Troy,

There is one glitch that if you can fix will greatly help out.

I noticed this before, but you are calling things "drain tendrils" that are not, or that I have labled differently.  Specifically, I think you are calling the Remora Control deck "Drain Tendrils."

Typically, I have only called decks "Drain Tendrils" that use the Intuition AK engine, like the deck that Codi Vinci used to play, or in Europe they call T1T, and it wins with Tinker or Tendrils.   

Could you go through and fix that?  Or else I'll have to.

Okay, I fixed everything that dealt with Remora.  But there are a few decks I still have some questions about.  What would you call these:

Adrià Galitó 3rd place deck http://morphling.de/top8decks.php?id=1057
Marius Morger 4th place deck http://morphling.de/top8decks.php?id=1065
Rubén González’s 3rd place deck http://morphling.de/top8decks.php?id=1080
Guillem Ragull’s 8th place deck http://morphling.de/top8decks.php?id=1080

I labeled them as Drain Tendrils decks but they lack the Intuition/AK engine you talk about.  What would you call them?

Peace,

-Troy

Well, it's interesting - I'm calling Colin Wu's deck (2nd place at the champs) Drian tendrils, cause that's what he called it.

But I think those lists with 4 Repeals, I have called those "European Control."   Take a look at the March/April data, and I think that reflects that.

If they have Mystic Remora and Meditate, I called them Remora Control (instead of Mystic Meditations).

If you make those tweaks then everything will be the same.

Interestingly, I tried to get away from the Mud/Stax/Worskhop Aggro trichotomy and call everything: Stax or Workshop Aggro, but you went back to the old category, so I'm going back as well.   Oh well. 
Logged

Smmenen
2007 Vintage World Champion
Adepts
Basic User
****
Posts: 6392


Smmenen
View Profile WWW
« Reply #12 on: September 17, 2009, 05:04:26 pm »

Also: one other thing, Troy.   I combined all Fish archetypes into one, and then sublisted the various permutations.   
Logged

Troy_Costisick
Full Members
Basic User
***
Posts: 1804


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #13 on: September 17, 2009, 05:14:55 pm »

Well, it's interesting - I'm calling Colin Wu's deck (2nd place at the champs) Drian tendrils, cause that's what he called it.

But I think those lists with 4 Repeals, I have called those "European Control."   Take a look at the March/April data, and I think that reflects that.

If they have Mystic Remora and Meditate, I called them Remora Control (instead of Mystic Meditations).

If you make those tweaks then everything will be the same.

Interestingly, I tried to get away from the Mud/Stax/Worskhop Aggro trichotomy and call everything: Stax or Workshop Aggro, but you went back to the old category, so I'm going back as well.   Oh well. 

I forgot to take the Mystic Meditations off.  It's been moved up to Remora Control.  

Quote
Also: one other thing, Troy.   I combined all Fish archetypes into one, and then sublisted the various permutations.  


That's totall cool with me.

I think I've got it all sorted out now.  Sorry about the confusion, Stephen.  

Peace,

-Troy
Logged

nineisnoone
Full Members
Basic User
***
Posts: 902


The Laughing Magician


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: September 18, 2009, 09:07:33 am »

Nothing to add.  Just wanted to give props to the work done.
Logged

I laugh a great deal because I like to laugh, but everything I say is deadly serious.
Raph Caron
Full Members
Basic User
***
Posts: 63


aka K-Run


View Profile Email
« Reply #15 on: September 18, 2009, 05:15:09 pm »

This is quite interesting to read. Statistics are always welcomed. I would comment that the old Necropotence suggestion should apply to Mana Drain, but I won't. Wink
Thanks for your work!
Logged

Cards I wish were restricted : Brainstorm, Mana Drain, Dark Ritual, Mishra's Workshop, Bazaar of Baghdad. Down to four!
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.08 seconds with 18 queries.