TheManaDrain.com
September 06, 2025, 04:22:00 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: [Free Article] The Eternal Spotlight: Changster's Paradise!  (Read 4285 times)
Islandswamp
Tournament Organizers
Basic User
**
Posts: 328


MTGGoldfish Writer


View Profile WWW Email
« on: June 19, 2015, 01:53:10 pm »


http://puremtgo.com/articles/eternal-spotlight-changsters-paradise

This week, I discuss the Angel City Vault deck I've been playing, and I obtained an interview with Roland Chang. My real life has been extraordinarily busy this week, so I wasn't able to crank out the usual 6,000 words. I hope everyone enjoys it! Much thanks to Changster. I love doing these interviews, and I know that my readers enjoy them as well.
Logged

Check out my articles @ www.mtggoldfish.com  www.puremtgo.com Follow me on Twitter: @josephfiorinijr - Watch me make EPIC PUNTS on Twitch.TV @ http://www.twitch.tv/josephfiorini06

Just like a car crash,
Just like a knife.
My favorite weapon
is the look in your eyes.
You've run out of lies...
EnialisLiadon
Basic User
**
Posts: 379


I like cake.


View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: June 20, 2015, 12:22:07 pm »

I've been wanting to get into MTGO ever since Vintage Masters came out--but I just can't justify spending a grand on digital cards in the same year that I finished my set of real power...and living in Boston with weekly vintage events. The issues with MTGO aren't back-breaking or a deal breaker for playing at all--but it's insane to me to pour that much money into a program where until recently Trygon Predator couldn't destroy enchantments, Trinisphere didn't correctly affect replicate or multikicker, and zooming in on Unhinged lands could cause the program to crash.

Cost plus issues with the client are what keeps me from buying into vintage on MTGO--not lack of interest. Solid article--really enjoyed the interview.
Logged
Smmenen
2007 Vintage World Champion
Adepts
Basic User
****
Posts: 6392


Smmenen
View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: June 20, 2015, 02:59:30 pm »

Trygon Predator destroyed enchantments in the VSL season 1. Mtgo is very convenient for testing and has generally stronger competition than most local tournament players.
Logged

Islandswamp
Tournament Organizers
Basic User
**
Posts: 328


MTGGoldfish Writer


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #3 on: June 20, 2015, 08:36:46 pm »

I've been wanting to get into MTGO ever since Vintage Masters came out--but I just can't justify spending a grand on digital cards in the same year that I finished my set of real power...and living in Boston with weekly vintage events. The issues with MTGO aren't back-breaking or a deal breaker for playing at all--but it's insane to me to pour that much money into a program where until recently Trygon Predator couldn't destroy enchantments, Trinisphere didn't correctly affect replicate or multikicker, and zooming in on Unhinged lands could cause the program to crash.

Cost plus issues with the client are what keeps me from buying into vintage on MTGO--not lack of interest. Solid article--really enjoyed the interview.

I was fortunate in that getting into vintage on mtgo didn't really cost me any additional money. I had a collection that was large enough to trade for tickets to do my buy-in.

If you have extra paper cards it's possible to trade them in for credits to buy what you need.
That's how I obtained my wastelands.

As for the issues with the client, there are some for sure. I feel like sometimes only the bad things are what people hear about. If you have a problem, you can get whatever entry fee you paid reimbursed.

Personally, I love that Magic Online allows me to play magic when it's convenient for me, and some of the best players are playing it.
I missed the one opportunity that I had to attend a Pro Tour, but a few weeks ago I got to play against a hall of fame member in a daily event. To me, that's something special.

Thanks to everyone for reading. The entire community has been incredibly supportive of my work. I can't thank you all enough.
Logged

Check out my articles @ www.mtggoldfish.com  www.puremtgo.com Follow me on Twitter: @josephfiorinijr - Watch me make EPIC PUNTS on Twitch.TV @ http://www.twitch.tv/josephfiorini06

Just like a car crash,
Just like a knife.
My favorite weapon
is the look in your eyes.
You've run out of lies...
MTGFan
Basic User
**
Posts: 273


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: June 21, 2015, 02:38:12 pm »

If Wizards respected its customers enough to keep pace with the competition in 2015 - i.e. actually developing MTGO client for platforms other than just Windows PCs, and creating more functional, less inefficient, memory-hogging software... then I would invest money into an MTGO collection. As it is, if a company can't even respect its customers enough to do these basic things - which are no problem for competitors like Blizzard and its superior (in technological terms) Hearthstone platform - then they aren't worth my time and my money.
Logged
gribdogs
Basic User
**
Posts: 54


View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: June 22, 2015, 09:28:31 am »

Great article, Joe.  I really enjoy interviews with Vintage celebrities.  Keep 'em coming.

It sucks that Vintage can't consistently fire.  For those who are invested in MTGO, why isn't everybody playing?  What's really going on causing Vintage to fail online?  Is it the prize support?  Is it the buggy V4?  Is it lack of tournaments or the time they are scheduled?  I can't answer any of these as I don't use MTG Online, but for the future of the format, we need to figure these things out so the whole community can keep growing. 
Logged
Islandswamp
Tournament Organizers
Basic User
**
Posts: 328


MTGGoldfish Writer


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #6 on: June 22, 2015, 02:43:27 pm »

Great article, Joe.  I really enjoy interviews with Vintage celebrities.  Keep 'em coming.

It sucks that Vintage can't consistently fire.  For those who are invested in MTGO, why isn't everybody playing?  What's really going on causing Vintage to fail online?  Is it the prize support?  Is it the buggy V4?  Is it lack of tournaments or the time they are scheduled?  I can't answer any of these as I don't use MTG Online, but for the future of the format, we need to figure these things out so the whole community can keep growing. 

First of all, thanks for reading.

I don't know exactly what the problem is with Dailies. I'm sure that the simplest explanation is that there isn't as many Vintage players as there are for other formats. Legacy events fire all the time, at least as far as I know.

Vintage is the newest format on MTGO, prior to this a format called "Classic" was as close as you could get.

When VMA first came out, there was a lot of interest in the format it seemed, and there still is a fair amount. With the other formats, "spikes" can use MTGO to practice for paper tournaments. Legacy has SCG support, as does Modern and Standard (which also have plenty of WOTC) support.

I think that might have something to do with it. Again, this is mostly guessing on my part. Obviously some folks in this thread have expressed their opinions of a lack of faith in the V4 client. I wish to again mention that I have minimal issues with the client on my computer (which is far from top-of-the-line). I've also never had an issue that didn't result in me getting reimbursed for my time.

For anyone reading this who is unaware because they haven't read all of my work, I've been interested in Vintage for a lot longer than I've been playing it. I was a kid in highschool when I started playing Magic, and I used to work my bad jobs for cash to buy cards. I traded everything I had to try to get enough for a "type one" deck. I had four of each dual land, 2 pieces of power, and some other expensive type one cards in my first collection. I never got to actually play in a type one tournament, and I sold that collection a long time ago.

For me, MTGO allowed me to play Vintage for the first time in my life. I simply couldn't afford to play it (without proxies) otherwise. I figure that if I'm interested in this, then some other people must be in my same position. So part of my mission in writing these articles is to show other people that this is a great format and worth investing in. I'm not looking to convince someone to play MTGO who is stuck on hating it. If they choose to change their mind, great. But a lot of people who play MTGO and have never played Vintage read PureMTGO, and it's mainly those folks that I'm trying to introduce Vintage to.

Logged

Check out my articles @ www.mtggoldfish.com  www.puremtgo.com Follow me on Twitter: @josephfiorinijr - Watch me make EPIC PUNTS on Twitch.TV @ http://www.twitch.tv/josephfiorini06

Just like a car crash,
Just like a knife.
My favorite weapon
is the look in your eyes.
You've run out of lies...
jcb193
Basic User
**
Posts: 410


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: June 23, 2015, 12:18:36 pm »

I love mtgo. Love it.

My frustrations:
I think a lot of vintage players are in a perpetual hunt for bigger and better cards. Completing power nine. Then beta. Then nm beta. This makes it hard to have the money to then buy expensive digital cards.

I hate the fact that as an active paper player, I now have to buy a digital card and a paper card. Annoying.

I also don't play any other formats, so my use for other cards is limited.

But probably the biggest hurdle is that in MTGO I kinda get locked into playing one deck. Trying to build other decks can get real expensive, real fast. Paper proxies alleviates this in RL, but for mtgo there is no solution.

But I would love if they have some sort of rental feature. Example: pay $.10 a card to rent the card for 48 hours. And add whatever caveats necessary (each account can only rent a specific card once a month, or whatever).

I'd love to play oath, or the answer, or steel city, but I'm not going to buy hundreds of dollars of more cards to do so.

Great read! Great interview, Now get an interview with Bertrand Lestree!
Logged
gribdogs
Basic User
**
Posts: 54


View Profile Email
« Reply #8 on: June 23, 2015, 12:39:10 pm »

They should've just done a monthly subscription that gives you access to every card printed.  But, apparently giving players what they want would just be too easy for Wizards.  That is why I will never play MTGO; a real-life overpriced market for tree fibers is already almost too much, so paying again for intangibles is total BS.
Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.276 seconds with 19 queries.