Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
|
8
|
Eternal Formats / Creative / Newb Needs A Sideboard Plan For Manaless
|
on: March 16, 2009, 09:33:43 am
|
|
maindeck is the following:
4 chalice of the void 4 serum powder
4 Golgari Grave-troll 4 Stinkweed Imp 4 Golgari Thug 4 Narcomoeba 4 Ichorid 1 Ancestor's Chosen 1 Flame-Kin Zealot 1 angel of despair 1 river kelpie
4 bridge from below 4 leyline of the void
1 darkblast
4 cabal therapy 3 dread return 3 unmask
4 bazaar of baghdad 3 windswept heath 1 bayou 1 dryad arbor
i know i wanna have 3 wooded foothills and a tropical island in my side, but wut is recommended for the other 11 cards? chain of vapor, emerald charm, reverent silience, oxidize, contagion seem pretty standard, but how much of what? also, wut do u side out? if u can give me some pointers about easy siding techniques, that would b awesome. thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
Eternal Formats / Creative / Re: My Nether Void Aggro deck again...
|
on: February 04, 2009, 08:02:07 am
|
used to play somethin like this back in the day for fun. i ran factories and blurred mongooses, too. also, if u r really serious about your side, i think u need extirpates with the leylines. i am pretty sure they work through chalice/nether void to boot. the latter would trigger, but not go on the stack. am i right? when u really get down to it mud/stax is better than something like this, but sometimes u just wanna play the cards u wanna play with; i totally understand that. gl. Hello, and welcome to The Mana Drain. TMD prides itself on maintaining higher standards for post quality than other sites. To that end, we ask that all posts reflect at least an attempt at proper spelling and grammar. AOL abbreviations are discouraged, and we ask that capitalized letters be used when necessary. Please review the site rules to avoid this problem going forward. Good luck with future posting. -DA
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
Eternal Formats / Miscellaneous / Re: Be Aggressive, B E Aggressive - 0 Land Belcher in Vintage
|
on: January 14, 2009, 10:33:34 am
|
|
actually, it's a lot better than that. if 1 of your first 7 cards is blue, the chances of 1 of the remaining 6 to b a blue source is like 74% (not counting street wraiths). u said earlier u shouldnt use a street wraith or morphose to try and top deck a win con and u have 8 of those, so i dont think u should factor street wraiths into an argument about getting to a blue source. in other words, i dont think u would keep a hand with a blue card, no blue source, and a street wraith (unless u have a lively belcher or big empty, of course). take that 74% with the 25% chance of actually getting 1 of those 2 blue cards in your first 7, and u have an unplayable blue card about 6 in every 100 games. not bad at all; i stand corrected.
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
Eternal Formats / Creative / Re: Guttural Response Or Pyroblast In Belcher?
|
on: January 09, 2009, 07:06:42 am
|
|
if i wasn't powerless (puts flamesuit on), i would definitely think about removing the land grant/taiga suite.
unfortunately, the closest thing i have to a metagame is looking on deckcheck.
browsing through the evolution of belcher a bit, looks like manamorphose has definitely replaced the chromatic artifacts, right? what about serum powder? i see that popping up a bit.
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
Eternal Formats / Creative / Guttural Response Or Pyroblast In Belcher? (Other Belcher Q's)
|
on: January 08, 2009, 03:09:22 pm
|
|
i'm torn between the almost colorless casting cost of response and the storm creation ability/versaility of pyroblast. response is obviously better the more chrome moxes u play, right? last night, i could have killed for a pyroblast staring down at a meddling mage, however. what is your guys' opinions? thanks.
|
|
|
|
|