TheManaDrain.com
December 22, 2025, 02:54:27 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: [Premium Article] The Dark Ascension Set Review & Updated Vintage Checklist SMIP  (Read 2526 times)
Smmenen
2007 Vintage World Champion
Adepts
Basic User
****
Posts: 6392


Smmenen
View Profile WWW
« on: January 24, 2012, 07:21:21 am »

So Many Insane Plays -- The Dark Ascension Set Review & Updated Vintage Checklist

http://www.eternal-central.com/?p=2544

Vintage author Stephen Menendian takes an in-depth look at Dark Ascension with this 42 page set review. He comprehensively examines every card from Dark Ascension in his characteristically detailed style, creates lots of new decklists!   In addition, Stephen updates the Ultimate Vintage Checklist, a must-have for every serious Vintage player and traders everywhere!

Excerpt:

Quote
Greetings Vintage adept! Welcome to my Dark Ascension Vintage Set Review. This will be the most comprehensive review of Dark Ascension for Vintage play available anywhere. I will carefully analyze every card in Dark Ascension for potential Vintage format applications. I will bring to bear not only my expertise, but unmatched experience in evaluating new cards for Vintage play. Not only do I have a proven track record of accurately forecasting new cards for Vintage play, my careful and detailed analysis snares cards that other reviewers overlooked or dismiss. I hope you find this set review enlightening and practical as you decide which cards you will acquire from Dark Ascension, and how you might approach the set from a deck construction perspective.

In addition, I have carefully updated the Ultimate Vintage Checklist, with Innistrad playables included and other cards that have appeared in Vintage Top 8’s since Innistrad. I have removed cards that no longer see play in Vintage. The Ultimate Vintage Checklist is intended for serious Vintage players to track their card needs and manage their collection, and provide a resource for deck construction, since each of the cards in the Checklist have been proven Vintage playable. In that role, it’s also invaluable for dealers and traders who may wish to use that resource in their transactions and to stock up on needed playables.

* * *

Dark Ascension is very much the heir to Innistrad. Innistrad set Vintage on the crash course it is currently veering uncontrollably along. In particular, Innistrad introduced three creatures that have contributed to a more creature-centric metagame. Beyond Innistrad, the rise of Landstill as a metagame predator and the strength of Mystic Remora are two additional factors that have pushed Vintage onto a creature trajectory.

By the close of 2011, the critical question for the future of the format was whether Vintage would continue on the same course or whether creature-centric strategies would prove unsustainable, a flash in the pan footnote on the overreaction to Landstill and Mystic Remora. Powerful counter-measures like Oath of Druids seemed poised to return, and their resurgence could end the spell of Tarmogoyf & Company’s brief reign over the Vintage landscape. Cards like Time Vault seemed positioned to combat the creature infestation. Misdirection was moving in to punish overreliance on cards like Snapcaster Mage.

A month ago I predicted for early 2012 that the salience of creatures as both strategic and tactical options would continue unabated, and offered many of the cards just described, and others, as innovative tactics and strategic solutions. Dark Ascension was the missing puzzle piece.

Other than restrictions, there is no force more powerful than the introduction of new sets to disrupt the flow of metagame currents. New printings interface the entire evolving metagame system simultaneously, cajoling it into new directions and spinning out new evolutions. The overarching question for the format was whether the trend toward creatures would continue, abruptly end or taper out, and Dark Ascension would provide most important set of clues to answer that question.

Would Dark Ascension promote a course correction? Would it provide tools to answer the variety of creature threats Innistrad introduced and the metagame advanced? Or would Dark Ascension be a mixture, providing answers and new threats, stirring the metagame pot into unpredictable directions? Would it be a steady influence, abstaining from the major questions of the moment, serving mostly as a flying buttress, allowing the metagame to evolve along a natural course? Or would it accelerate the trends set forward by Innistrad and the metagame factors already mentioned?

All of these possibilities loomed, and now that Dark Ascension is before us, the answer is clear. Dark Ascension is the heir to Innistrad. Whereas Innistrad brought into Vintage a few key playables, it gently nudged the metagame system in the direction of creature-based strategies. Not only did Snapcaster Mage, Delver of Secrets, and Laboratory Maniac all see significant play, but Stony Silence provided another tool for Aggro-Control decks, and Witchbane Orb another Oath solution for Workshop Aggro decks. Innistrad was the rudder for the Titanic. Innistrad wasn’t an engine, powering the metagame forward, but it set the metagame on an ineluctable course. The speed and force of change would be decided by us.

What distinguishes Dark Ascension from Innistrad is that this set puts the foot to the pedal. The answer as to what effect Dark Ascension might have on Vintage is abundantly clear. Dark Ascension firmly accentuates…
« Last Edit: January 24, 2012, 07:52:10 am by Smmenen » Logged

Kiriyuu
Basic User
**
Posts: 81


major_motoko_kusanagi@hotmail.com
View Profile
« Reply #1 on: January 24, 2012, 12:29:56 pm »

"Alternatively, they only play
one spell, and you play the other, to get this card to flip back."    (Afflicted Deserter//Werewolf Ransacker)

Alas, this doesn't work, the werewolves only flip back if a player played two or more spells, not just if 2 or more spells were played.
Logged

^___________________________________________________^
Smmenen
2007 Vintage World Champion
Adepts
Basic User
****
Posts: 6392


Smmenen
View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: January 24, 2012, 06:35:00 pm »

Aha!  So it is.  That just underscores my point about the lack of playable Werewolves. 

I hope folks really enjoy this article.  Part of the fun was brewing up all of these interesting, and odd decks.  I put serious effort into developing some of these decks.  The R/G beats deck is the best version of the deck I've developed since my article on the archetype a few years ago.   

The Madness deck is just pure fun.   Enjoy!
Logged

BaronSengir
Basic User
**
Posts: 128


patriarch1002
View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: January 25, 2012, 10:32:37 am »

Great review Stephen. I definitely used this as a guide for buying Dark Ascension cards.  Very Happy
Logged

"Bottled life. Not as tasty as I'm used to, rather stale, but it has the same effect." Baron Sengir
My Deck Index
Smmenen
2007 Vintage World Champion
Adepts
Basic User
****
Posts: 6392


Smmenen
View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: January 25, 2012, 11:31:51 am »

Great review Stephen. I definitely used this as a guide for buying Dark Ascension cards.  Very Happy

You are very welcome Smile   That's one of the best uses.  

For the first time, I managed to get ahead of pretty much everyone else who is writing set reviews -- and I don't just mean Vintage writers.  SCG has this silly policy where they postpone all of their set reviews until the week after the pre-release.  

I want my readers to be armed with their card needs BEFORE the pre-release.  People who have this article can print out the checklist and take it to their pre-release to track down all of their cards.   They can also use this to create major trade value, identifying cards that Vintage players will need -- whether they know it or not Wink.  

I've been doing set reviews since Time Spiral, and reviewing new cards since at least Mirrodin, and in that entire time, I've missed maybe 3 cards that ended up being relevant to the format.   With my new method of reviewing every card, it pretty much guarantees that I have to carefully evaluate every possible application, and the middle category -- of remote, but possibly playable -- ensures that I flag even the most remote Vintage applications for your attention.  My set reviews are designed to be workman like, careful technical analysis for the serious player.  

This may sound insidious, but my goal is really to destroy the surprise & fun of new sets.  Not only do I want to ruin the surprise of any new cards that may pop up for Vintage play, but I also want to take the fun out of innovating new decks, by creating at least drafts of any new decks that could emerge based on the new set, and make it virtually impossible for my readers to be surprised by the emergence of new decks in upcoming tournaments.   For example, if folks had read my Innnistrad set review, they would have been aware of the Dday Combo with Lab Maniac, and the possible Dday piles.  

After all, I am a Sith Lord Smile

« Last Edit: January 25, 2012, 11:42:02 am by Smmenen » Logged

BaronSengir
Basic User
**
Posts: 128


patriarch1002
View Profile WWW
« Reply #5 on: January 25, 2012, 11:49:32 am »

Great review Stephen. I definitely used this as a guide for buying Dark Ascension cards.  Very Happy

You are very welcome Smile   That's one of the best uses.  

For the first time, I managed to get ahead of pretty much everyone else who is writing set reviews -- and I don't just mean Vintage writers.  SCG has this silly policy where they postpone all of their set reviews until the week after the pre-release.  

I want my readers to be armed with their card needs BEFORE the pre-release.  People who have this article can print out the checklist and take it to their pre-release to track down all of their cards.   They can also use this to create major trade value, identifying cards that Vintage players will need -- whether they know it or not Wink.  

I've been doing set reviews since Time Spiral, and reviewing new cards since at least Mirrodin, and in that entire time, I've missed maybe 3 cards that ended up being relevant to the format.   With my new method of reviewing every card, it pretty much guarantees that I have to carefully evaluate every possible application, and the middle category -- of remote, but possibly playable -- ensures that I flag even the most remote Vintage applications for your attention.  My set reviews are designed to be workman like, careful technical analysis for the serious player.
They are greatly appreciated. I'll definitely be checking your reviews for all future sets as it saves me a lot of money and time.  Smile
Logged

"Bottled life. Not as tasty as I'm used to, rather stale, but it has the same effect." Baron Sengir
My Deck Index
evouga
Basic User
**
Posts: 537


View Profile Email
« Reply #6 on: January 25, 2012, 02:37:04 pm »

Thanks Stephen. I haven't yet read through the set review, but a quick note: in the future, could you please ensure that the .pdfs have embedded fonts? The set review uses non-embedded Arial and it looks quite strange on my Linux machine.
Logged
Smmenen
2007 Vintage World Champion
Adepts
Basic User
****
Posts: 6392


Smmenen
View Profile WWW
« Reply #7 on: January 25, 2012, 04:43:10 pm »

I will pass your message along to the publisher (JACO at EC).   If other people notice strange things like that as well, speak up.
Logged

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.266 seconds with 17 queries.