TheManaDrain.com
September 04, 2025, 09:33:40 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: SPEC IN T1  (Read 5741 times)
jeremyc_1999
Guest
« on: December 07, 2003, 02:23:12 pm »

I have recently been thinking that in the current enviroment it may be possible for a new breed of madness to compete at the T1 Level.  I will say that I have not tested this deck so if any of you have please let me know your results.  I will start testing today.  This Deck can hopefully compete after the bannings take place

Mana: (22)
1 Black Lotus
1 Mox Sapphire
1 Mox Emerald
1 Lion's Eye Diamond
4 Bazaar of Bagdad
4 Tropical Island
4 Windswept Heath
3 Forest
3 Island

Green: (16)
4 Wild Mongrel
4 Arrogant Wurm
4 Roar of the Wurm
4 Basking Rootwalla


Blue: (22)
1 Ancestral recall
1 Timewalk
3 Intuition
3 Cunning Wish
2 Wonder
4 Deep Analysis
4 Force of Will
4 circular logic

Sideboard:
4 Naturalize
4 tormad's crypt
3 berserk
4 counterspell
The sb is not entirely decided.  IT will probably be changed after testing more.\n\n

Logged
MolotDET
Guest
« Reply #1 on: December 07, 2003, 02:44:13 pm »

I know that madness isn't dead.  And I understand the concept but I was wondering mhy you would use Speculation over Intuition?

I would think that it would be better.

I know that Spec was used in type2 madness decks but Intuition seems like it might be better if not just as good.
Logged
Dr. Sylvan
Guest
« Reply #2 on: December 07, 2003, 03:14:01 pm »

Intuition also makes access to Wonder easier, which would give you at least two more slots. The only time four Wonder was sensical was in Block Constructed when the mirror was everything.

Yawgmoth's Will, while insane, is not appropriate for this deck to the best of my experience (in fact, I don't understand black in here at all). The cards in this deck have flashback anyway, or get better by being discarded, which Will prohibits.

Cunning Wish seems like a slow tool for such an aggressive deck. Rather than getting answers, you should be kicking ass.
Logged
jeremyc_1999
Guest
« Reply #3 on: December 07, 2003, 03:21:19 pm »

I actually didn't think of intuition.  I will try it and see.  I know that spec can be a turn earlier and you don't really want roar of the wurm or deep analysis in you hand.  Also, if I sideboard ray of revalation, I would want spec.  I will further test it though.
Logged
Diaonic
Guest
« Reply #4 on: December 07, 2003, 03:23:35 pm »

Quote
Quote Black: (2)
1 Demonic Tutor
1 Yawgmoths Will

Black should not be in this deck. For the following reasons. Turn two you want to be casting threats while your oppents is digging for answers. Not tutoring and casting threats the following turn. So your making the deck slower then it should be.

Yawg Will is terrible in this deck. The mana base doesn't support you hardcasting any of your creatures in the grave. Most of your card draw already flashes back.( in most builds)

Quote
Quote 2 Quiet Speculation
Run Intuition its better for the extra 1 mana and at instant speed. I currently run an aggro version of madness which i can post if there is enough interest. So intuition or spec is not included in my build.

Quote
Quote 4 Wonder
This is overkill, its been debated to take these out of the deck entirely, I still run two in my build and will continue to run two. They just win games but four is to much.


Quote
Quote
1 Berserk
3 Cunning Wish
Why is Berserk not in the board if you are running wishes?

Anyway I have never been a big fan of the control madness builds but thats what I can offer you for suggestions.

-Corey
Logged
jeremyc_1999
Guest
« Reply #5 on: December 07, 2003, 03:27:36 pm »

Quote
Quote Yawgmoth's Will, while insane, is not appropriate for this deck to the best of my experience (in fact, I don't understand black in here at all). The cards in this deck have flashback anyway, or get better by being discarded, which Will prohibits.

I took black out.   I  am not sure that I like not having the smothers for removal.  I took them out for more counterspells.  I will continue testing.\n\n

Logged
specialk
Guest
« Reply #6 on: December 07, 2003, 05:03:12 pm »

with intuition in the deck and bazaar might I suggest 2-3 Squee if nothing else you can pump mongrel
Logged
Matt The Great
Guest
« Reply #7 on: December 07, 2003, 05:08:04 pm »

If you're running Intuitions you should definitely consider a Riftstone Portal. They suck in multiples, but when you can fetch it on demand it could be a potent card.
Logged
Rico Suave
Guest
« Reply #8 on: December 07, 2003, 05:10:03 pm »

You don't need Squee to make Bazaar or Intuition good.  You do need Bazaar to make Squee good though.  But Bazaar wins already.

Anyway, the biggest problem I see is that the first posted deck has serious mana problems.  Not only are you lacking sheer amount of mana, but you are also lacking acceleration.  There isn't much point to playing fatties unless they come out early.
Logged
BreathWeapon
Guest
« Reply #9 on: December 07, 2003, 05:29:42 pm »

Any Madness deck not running 4 Careful Study isn't worth looking at. I'd also up that Moxen count to the full 5 and even consider ESG in multiples.

I do agree that U/G Control Madness is the only form of Madness worth playaing in T1 now.
Logged
jeremyc_1999
Guest
« Reply #10 on: December 07, 2003, 06:18:52 pm »

Quote
Quote Any Madness deck not running 4 Careful Study isn't worth looking at.

I really don't think that careful studies are necessary if you are running 4 bazarr of bagdad.  THe esg's and/or the full moxen may help, but in my early testing, I find no problem dropping early fatties.  That is the benefit of madness, you can play fatties for cheaper.
Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.027 seconds with 17 queries.