TheManaDrain.com
October 10, 2025, 08:02:30 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Is it time for the DCI to take action???  (Read 1626 times)
Stupid_Newb
Basic User
**
Posts: 65


View Profile
« on: June 18, 2004, 09:26:14 pm »

Reading a report from last weekend's Central Coast Championship, a few things struct me as odd. Three decks in the Top 8? Hulk, 7/10, and Fish. That's it for the Top 8. Is it just me or does that seem like an unhealthy meta?

And to make things stranger, 14 of the 42 decks (I'm not sure of the exact numbers, but those are in the general area) were Tog (and I'm not sure if these numbers included).

33% of the decks were Tog. One in every three decks was Tog. That's alot of Tog.

Now to me, that doesn't seem good, and I think a change must be made. I'm not suggesting restrictions, but unrestrictions are definately called for. Does anyone else have thoughts on the matter?
Logged

Quote from: HAPLO
Stupid_Newb puts Time Walk to Hand from Play
<HAPLO> IT'S FORBIDDEN
<Stupid_Newb> ?
<HAPLO> time walk
<Stupid_Newb> what does that mean?
<HAPLO> i can play blavk lotus if you want
<System> Player Lost
Ric_Flair
Full Members
Basic User
***
Posts: 589


TSculimbrene
View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: June 18, 2004, 09:40:08 pm »

One tourament?!?!?!  Your sample size is one tournament.  Think of a new argument.  That one is terrible.
Logged

In order to be the MAN...WOOOO!....you have to beat the MAN....WOOOOO!

Co-founder of the movement to elect Zherbus to the next Magic Invitational.  VOTE ZHERBUS!

Power Count: 4/9
psyburat
Adepts
Basic User
****
Posts: 463


Mike Noble


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: June 18, 2004, 09:54:32 pm »

Wow, there are three different decks in the Top 8.  Doesn't that just sound absolutely healthy. Rolling Eyes  Seriously, quiet down child.
Logged

How very me of you.
Kerz
Nobody wants to play with me!
Full Members
Basic User
***
Posts: 603


Kerzkid14
View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: June 18, 2004, 09:57:04 pm »

No, see.. the less decks, the more healthy the format. Look at type two, the format that is almost completely DCI regulated. At any time, there are only 3-4 competitive decks, which is a good thing, really. It makes testing and anticipating metagames easier. Only three archetypes in a t8 for type one is EXTREMELY low, I'd even go as far to say its ahead of its time. Maybe the amazing player base at this tournament is a reason.

In summation: less decks = good, more decks = disorganized rogue format.
Logged

Team Hadley: FOR FUCKING LIFE
Spizzard
Basic User
**
Posts: 50

spizzard_@hotmail.com Spizzard55
View Profile
« Reply #4 on: June 18, 2004, 10:37:19 pm »

When good players play good decks.... or decks they are so familiar with, they tend to post good results.  Big deal anyway. Think back to Grow-a-tog or 4 FoF BBS....thats when something actually had to be done.
Logged
Moxlotus
Teh Absolut Ballz
Full Members
Basic User
***
Posts: 2199


Where the fuck are my pants?

moxlotusgws
View Profile
« Reply #5 on: June 18, 2004, 10:45:55 pm »

Look at ANY other tournament T8 and you will see no less than 4 or maybe even 5 different archetypes.  NOw if this happens at Kalamazoo, Dulmen, SCG tourney, Waterbury, and Gencon then do something.
Logged

Cybernations--a free nation building game.
http://www.cybernations.net
Dr. Sylvan
TMD Oracle and Uber-Melvin
Adepts
Basic User
****
Posts: 1973



View Profile Email
« Reply #6 on: June 18, 2004, 11:24:43 pm »

I can see my marketing department has not been working hard enough to market my articles.

Locked.
Logged

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.028 seconds with 20 queries.