TheManaDrain.com
February 13, 2026, 05:08:10 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Old, but whatever... July's midlevel breakdown.  (Read 2441 times)
Zherbus
Administrator
Basic User
*****
Posts: 2406


FatherHell
View Profile WWW
« on: September 23, 2004, 08:48:47 am »

http://www.starcitygames.com/php/news/expandnews.php?Article=8131
Logged

Founder, Admin of TheManaDrain.com

Team Meandeck: Because Noble Panther Decks Keeper
Grand Inquisitor
Always the play, never the thing
Adepts
Basic User
****
Posts: 1476


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: September 24, 2004, 01:21:03 am »

Nice work Steve.  Is this going to become a regular thing with Phil handling the 50+ and you, the 50-30 tournaments?

Quote
In the small to mid-size fields, Workshop decks pack such a punch in a low Workshop environment that I believe they are probably your best way of making a top 8. To clarify, New England in particular is generally control and aggro-control heavy.


I completely agree with the first part.  I strongly disagree with the 2nd.  Because smaller events usually have lots of underpowered decks, workshop decks can take advantage of this because of their acceleration.  On the other hand, I don't think you can say any longer that NE is biased towards control.  In T1, regardless of the metagame, there will always be some card selection bias (except at infinite proxy events).  However, now-a-days in NE, people just play what's good, and you'll notice, the world over, that blue spells are popular.  In recent months Mono U and Slaver have made this more striking.  If anything, I think many regions suffered from a shortage of control/hate players to deal with combo and workshop because of their small player pools.  In general, many of these metagame 'slants' are on the mend.
Logged

There is not a single argument in your post. Just statements that have no meaning. - Guli

It's pretty awesome that I did that - Smmenen
Smmenen
Guest
« Reply #2 on: September 24, 2004, 02:47:54 pm »

Oh I definately agree with the second part.

What won the Waterbury was what was able to beat Aggro-control, Aggro and Control.  That's always been the Waterbury field and will continue to be the Waterbury field.  In January, when I was there, the answer was Aggro-Control.  It beat the Aggro, the Control and the Aggro-Control decks.  That was what won.  limoges with GAT and EBA.  

This time, it's the same equation, but different solution.  People played Combo decks that beat Aggro, Control, and Aggro-Control.  TPS beats all of those.  Long had to be piloted well to beat Control but beats the rest.  Long had the advantage of not capable of losing to Combo and therefore placed high.

What is missing from this equation?  WORKSHOPS.  The tremendous lack of Workshops undercuts the legitimatecy and applicability of the NE metagame, say for my purposes and for SCG planning/preparation.
Logged
Purple Hat
Full Members
Basic User
***
Posts: 1100



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: September 26, 2004, 03:25:08 am »

Workshops were definately present at waterbury.  I know that they were.  The thing was workshop decks killed each other or lost to dragon and aggro in the early rounds.  Then they all ended up playing at bottom tables and lost.  They were there but didn't really factor into the meta after round 4 or so.

hale
Logged

"it's brainstorm...how can you not play brainstorm?  You've cast that card right?  and it resolved?" -Pat Chapin

Just moved - Looking for players/groups in North Jersey to sling some cardboard.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.025 seconds with 19 queries.