TheManaDrain.com
December 22, 2025, 05:16:37 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: [article] Finding the Tink…er, Control Slaver Deck  (Read 1544 times)
jpmeyer
fancy having a go at it?
Adepts
Basic User
****
Posts: 2390


badplayermeyer
View Profile WWW
« on: October 21, 2004, 05:59:23 am »

Now you too can know what I'm talking about when I say that Type 1 is a PTQ format!
Logged

Team Meandeck: "As much as I am a clueless, credit-stealing, cheating homo I do think we would do well to consider the current stage of the Vintage community." -Smmenen
Covetous
Basic User
**
Posts: 199


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: October 21, 2004, 06:52:42 am »

Good article JP.  The presence of big tourneys forces people to keep quiet about tech in general.  I have noticed a large decline in posts from people on the big type 1 teams in the time leading up to the next SCG P9 tourney.  I find it interesting that it's some of the same people who make TMD the best type 1 site who are keeping quiet for the sake of team secrecy.  It's not that I don't understand or want to criticize--if you can win several hundred dollars by not sharing tech, then why should you?  Well, I guess the answer could be that the so-called decline of TMD could in fact be due to the lack of posts by good players because they want to out-tech their opponents at the next big tourney.  I'm not saying that the people who are posting aren't good players, but for the most part I have noticed that the "big name" players have been keeping very very quiet in some of the most tourney-relevant threads, with the exception of spam-removal, etc.  I'm not making value judgements here, I just wanted to point out that some of the same people who complain that the level of post quality on TMD has decreased are the same quiet people who made/make TMD great.  

But back on topic--I didn't pick up on whether you think having type 1 be a PTQ format is a good or bad thing.  If it allows a coherent metagame to evolve constantly and allows people to share more tech, then it's a good thing.  Way to go to all the TO's who have provided all the great tourneys this summer and fall.
Logged

"What does he do, this man you seek?"
"He kills women!"
"No!  That is incidental...He covets.  That is his nature."

Life is like a penis--when it's soft, you can't beat it, but when it's hard, you get screwed.
Andreas
Basic User
**
Posts: 63



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: October 21, 2004, 08:20:10 am »

I have two questions regarding the Tog list you posted:

1) What made you abandon the maindeck Deep Analysis?

2) With so many silver bullets for Tog standards (Ground Seal, Back to Basics, to a lesser extent Pernicious Deed) maybe Vampiric Tutor has a place in the maindeck. Or would it be enough to have it as a wish target?
Logged
Jacob Orlove
Official Time Traveller of TMD
Administrator
Basic User
*****
Posts: 8074


When am I?


View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: October 21, 2004, 11:38:00 am »

Quote from: Andreas
1) What made you abandon the maindeck Deep Analysis?

This even I can answer. He cut them because he doesn't expect to face the mirror.
Logged

Team Meandeck: O Lord,
Guard my tongue from evil and my lips from speaking guile.
To those who slander me, let me give no heed.
May my soul be humble and forgiving to all.
jpmeyer
fancy having a go at it?
Adepts
Basic User
****
Posts: 2390


badplayermeyer
View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: October 21, 2004, 04:54:04 pm »

I don't have it main because I want to Wish for it.
Logged

Team Meandeck: "As much as I am a clueless, credit-stealing, cheating homo I do think we would do well to consider the current stage of the Vintage community." -Smmenen
Matt
Post like a butterfly, Mod like a bee.
Adepts
Basic User
****
Posts: 2297


King of the Jews!


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: October 21, 2004, 07:36:34 pm »

Quote from: jpmeyer
I don't have it main because I want to Wish for it.

Um...I don't see Burning Wish.
Logged

http://www.goodgamery.com/pmo/c025.GIF
----------------------
SpenceForHire2k7: Its unessisary
SpenceForHire2k7: only spelled right
SpenceForHire2k7: <= world english teach evar
----------------------
noitcelfeRmaeT
{Team Hindsight}
jpmeyer
fancy having a go at it?
Adepts
Basic User
****
Posts: 2390


badplayermeyer
View Profile WWW
« Reply #6 on: October 21, 2004, 07:54:31 pm »

I'm answering question #2
Logged

Team Meandeck: "As much as I am a clueless, credit-stealing, cheating homo I do think we would do well to consider the current stage of the Vintage community." -Smmenen
Revvik
Basic User
**
Posts: 725


Team BC

Revvik
View Profile Email
« Reply #7 on: October 21, 2004, 07:59:32 pm »

I believe he's referring to the Vampiric tutor - not the Deep Analysis.  Correct me if I'm wrong, of course.


Also, fetching said bullets (Ground Seal, Pernicious Deed, B2B...etc.) occurs less frequently (at least for me) than fetching the various draw / powerful spells that normally serve to either win the game, or draw what Vampiric Tutor would fetch up anyways.

Also, in my opinion, Vampiric Tutor felt like a last resort for a desperate situation - pulling out the Deed when faced with a disgusting amount of opposing weenies/fishies, etc. - which rarely occurs when 'tog is piloted by a more skilled player.

And the chances for the mirror do seem less likely, despite fish's decline.
Logged

http://www.thehardlessons.com/

I will break into your house while you aren't home and disguise myself as a chair. Then I will leave before you get home, but there will be a place at your table where I was a chair and you will wonder why there isn't a chair there. Then later I will leave the chair disguise on your doorstep and you will realize what has happened and you will be afraid all the time. Helter Skelter mother fuckers!
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.034 seconds with 18 queries.