TheManaDrain.com
October 02, 2025, 05:36:14 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Give me my worst  (Read 860 times)
Jacques
Basic User
**
Posts: 31


View Profile
« on: August 25, 2005, 02:09:19 pm »

I was talking to a friend a few days ago about Gifts Ungiven.  This got me thinking about tutors that gave your opponent some control over what you got.  So I'm sitting there trying to figure out a new way to do.  Obviously there's the problem of them just giving you a land every time you get it.  Where as this may be useful in some situations, most of the time it'd be bad.  I'm tired of seeing "Take X cards from you library, and opponent chooses Y of them that you get" type cards.  I want your opponent to have access to your library.  Ultimately I came up with this:

What've I got?
{x}{u}
Instant
Target opponent searches your library for a card with converted mana cost x or more.  Put that card into your hand, then shuffle your library.

The x clause is mainly to prevent them from giving you a land every time, but also to make it slightly custom tailorable.  I could see having it make them give you a card with cmc of x, though I'd prefer not to if at all avoidable.  Obviously, letting your opponent have complete access to your library is a rather large drawback.  They'll know what you're playing and they   could even figure out your hand given enough time.  I could see a weird combo deck with all low cost spells and one or two high costing finishers.

Current Wording:

What've I got?
{x}{u}
Instant
Target opponent searches your library for a card with converted mana cost x or more.  Put that card into your hand, then shuffle your library.
« Last Edit: August 25, 2005, 02:14:01 pm by Jacques » Logged
Matt
Post like a butterfly, Mod like a bee.
Moderator
Basic User
*****
Posts: 2297


King of the Jews!


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: August 25, 2005, 02:36:43 pm »

One thing I notice about this is that it's really really hard to find things of CMC=1 because they'll just get you another of these tutors. Maybe put "not named ~this~" on it somewhere?

Other than that I like this a lot.
Logged

http://www.goodgamery.com/pmo/c025.GIF
----------------------
SpenceForHire2k7: Its unessisary
SpenceForHire2k7: only spelled right
SpenceForHire2k7: <= world english teach evar
----------------------
noitcelfeRmaeT
{Team Hindsight}
Jacques
Basic User
**
Posts: 31


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: August 25, 2005, 02:48:49 pm »

So are you also suggesting I make it say "with cmc equal to x"?  Because right now, it says x or more.
Logged
Matt
Post like a butterfly, Mod like a bee.
Moderator
Basic User
*****
Posts: 2297


King of the Jews!


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: August 25, 2005, 04:16:12 pm »

I would like the CMC=X version but you don't HAVE to. It should get that clause even if you don't - someone might want to use it in some arcane Kobold deck or something.
Logged

http://www.goodgamery.com/pmo/c025.GIF
----------------------
SpenceForHire2k7: Its unessisary
SpenceForHire2k7: only spelled right
SpenceForHire2k7: <= world english teach evar
----------------------
noitcelfeRmaeT
{Team Hindsight}
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.034 seconds with 21 queries.