TheManaDrain.com
October 05, 2025, 03:13:16 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Do Leylines Encourage Cheating?  (Read 2290 times)
Cavius The Great
Basic User
**
Posts: 379


I'm realer than you.

King+Cavi
View Profile
« on: January 27, 2006, 07:24:02 pm »

I think that everyone has seem the guildpact spoilers and are familiar with the "Leyline" cards. Those who are not familiar with them, I can give a brief description; they basically come into play for free if you have them in your opening hand. That being said, wouldn't a card like that "temp" players to pack over four copies in their decks? In loosely enforced tournaments that can very well happen when the decks aren't properly inspected. The only situation where that would not be possible would be a PTQ or something similiar. My question is, "If you play FNM or any weekly tournaments, would you consider the leylines a threat against player integrity?"

Moved from the Legacy Development Forum. - Bardo
« Last Edit: January 30, 2006, 03:04:08 pm by Jacob Orlove » Logged

Creator of Nourishing Lich & Enchantress Bloom.

PM me if you're interested in serious Vintage testing on MWS.
Lunar
Basic User
**
Posts: 535



View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: January 27, 2006, 07:50:57 pm »

Does the lure of Tinker or Oath or Welder in your opening hand tempt you to cheat?

how silly...cheaters will cheat regardless, I doubt the OVERWHELMING POWER of leylines will do much if anything in this regard.
Logged

Dozer - "TMD is not a place where everyone can just post what was revealed to them in their latest wet dream"

Webster - "most of the deck is pimped, like my insane shirt, which exudes a level of pimpness only to be expressed as sublime."
Kowal
My name is not Brian.
Adepts
Basic User
****
Posts: 2497


Reanimate your feet!


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: January 27, 2006, 08:27:28 pm »

I think what he's implying is that it's easier to get away with running six leylines than it is to get away with running six tinkers.
Logged
Tha Gunslinga
Full Members
Basic User
***
Posts: 1583


De-Errata Mystical Tutor!

ThaGunslingaMOTL
View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: January 27, 2006, 11:04:03 pm »

You could run 6 FoWs or 6 Mana Drains just as easily, or 2 YawgWills.  I don't see any reason for people to cheat more now.
Logged

Don't tolerate splittin'
The Atog Lord
Administrator
Basic User
*****
Posts: 3451


The+Atog+Lord
View Profile
« Reply #4 on: January 28, 2006, 01:22:57 am »

Quote
I think what he's implying is that it's easier to get away with running six leylines than it is to get away with running six tinkers.

Please play twelve against me.
Logged

The Academy: If I'm not dead, I have a Dragonlord Dromoka coming in 4 turns
Cavius The Great
Basic User
**
Posts: 379


I'm realer than you.

King+Cavi
View Profile
« Reply #5 on: January 28, 2006, 01:42:50 pm »

I think what he's implying is that it's easier to get away with running six leylines than it is to get away with running six tinkers.

Exactly. Leylines also give an extra incentive to cheaters to pack around 8 for example, increasing their odds of getting it into play on the first turn. Leylines are basically "free" on the first turn, so wouldn't packing 8 increase those odds?
Logged

Creator of Nourishing Lich & Enchantress Bloom.

PM me if you're interested in serious Vintage testing on MWS.
Lou
Tournament Organizers
Basic User
**
Posts: 313


'it never got weird enough for me'

fknlouwhoru ctaalc2
View Profile
« Reply #6 on: January 28, 2006, 02:09:38 pm »

I think what he's implying is that it's easier to get away with running six leylines than it is to get away with running six tinkers.

Exactly. Leylines also give an extra incentive to cheaters to pack around 8 for example, increasing their odds of getting it into play on the first turn. Leylines are basically "free" on the first turn, so wouldn't packing 8 increase those odds?

What are you going to do with those other 7?  Leyline of the Void seems to be the only remotely possible Leyline that will see play in Type 1, and if you end up drawing 7 extra ones, you have probably assured your loss.

To answer your original question, fuck no, no one will want to cheat by running extra Leylines, because it doesn't have a big benefit.  Run 2 Ancestrals, or 2 Loti.  That would be savage.  But Leylines?  No.
Logged

Team Meandeck                                                         @louchristopher
Matt
Post like a butterfly, Mod like a bee.
Adepts
Basic User
****
Posts: 2297


King of the Jews!


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: January 28, 2006, 02:55:00 pm »

Most EVERY card has a big benefit from being in your opening hand. That's what makes them good cards. Certainly Lotus, or LoA or FoW would be better. Just because the Leylines are ONLY good in your opening hand, doesn't mean they're going to make cheating more tempting.

This is actually one of the worst ways to cheat, because it's possible to prove it by a deckcheck. Manaweaving or palming cards is much harder to prove without a camera.
Logged

http://www.goodgamery.com/pmo/c025.GIF
----------------------
SpenceForHire2k7: Its unessisary
SpenceForHire2k7: only spelled right
SpenceForHire2k7: <= world english teach evar
----------------------
noitcelfeRmaeT
{Team Hindsight}
Evenpence
Basic User
**
Posts: 815


AlphaFoNGGGG
View Profile Email
« Reply #8 on: January 28, 2006, 03:33:53 pm »

Most EVERY card has a big benefit from being in your opening hand. That's what makes them good cards. Certainly Lotus, or LoA or FoW would be better. Just because the Leylines are ONLY good in your opening hand, doesn't mean they're going to make cheating more tempting.

This is actually one of the worst ways to cheat, because it's possible to prove it by a deckcheck. Manaweaving or palming cards is much harder to prove without a camera.

Amen.  Palming Cards is actually the hardest of everything to check, because even with a camera, it's hard to tell, and it's certainly the most effiecent way to cheat.

You can always get caught playing Ubastax, and revealing 5 mana drains, or (even stupider) a second copy of a restricted bomb.

You virtually cannot, however, catch someone who palms a black lotus in their sleeve.  It's an amazing talent, but it shouldn't be used to cheat.  I know a bunch of people who can palm cards, and we're always sure to shuffle for them on Poker night.  Smile  Doing a random count of cards is good too, because it's quick and doesn't require the hassle of a deckcheck.
Logged

Quote
[17:25] Desolutionist: i hope they reprint empty the warrens as a purple card in planar chaos
Cavius The Great
Basic User
**
Posts: 379


I'm realer than you.

King+Cavi
View Profile
« Reply #9 on: January 29, 2006, 01:54:44 pm »

I'm new to that concept. Does palming cards damage them in any way? It seems like it would if they're bent to a certain degree.
Logged

Creator of Nourishing Lich & Enchantress Bloom.

PM me if you're interested in serious Vintage testing on MWS.
Aaron
Basic User
**
Posts: 58


intelli78
View Profile WWW
« Reply #10 on: January 30, 2006, 11:12:24 pm »

It seems silly to cheat by loading your deck with excess Leylines. Personally, I would much rather pack a few extra Mana Drains, Smokestacks, or whatever (not that I would  Wink) than Leylines. I'd say they're better to have in your opening seven.
Logged

M A N A   D R A I N
Mykeatog
Full Members
Basic User
***
Posts: 265


Mykeatog
View Profile
« Reply #11 on: February 02, 2006, 06:29:40 am »

Is this really what it has come to?

TMD is impressive.
Logged

Free Agent
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.034 seconds with 18 queries.