TheManaDrain.com
June 30, 2026, 02:58:31 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: evermind  (Read 1639 times)
Ender
Basic User
**
Posts: 66



View Profile
« on: May 26, 2006, 10:14:42 pm »

Ok.. this is a pretty easy question but somewhere along the lines I got utterly confused... anyway.

You play Glacial Ray and splice onto it Evermind (so evermind stays in hand). Is the spell blue or red?

I always thought it was blue but I looked it up on SCG.com one day.

If Evermind is in your hand, you can play its splice onto Arcane ability. However, the splice ability doesn't copy characteristic-setting abilities. This means that the text "Evermind is blue" isn't copied onto the Arcane spell.

Ok... no problem.. so I double check with wizards.com's oracle text and offical rulings.

Aug 1, 2005 - If Evermind is in your hand, you can play its splice onto Arcane ability. The splice ability copies characteristic-setting abilities. This means that the text "Evermind is blue" is copied onto the Arcane spell, making it blue.


well... damn...
Logged

Fear the bunnies for they will rule the world one day. Unless George Bush is one of them then we may already be too late....

Protect this world and kill a bunny. The fluffy cute ones are the most dangerous kind.
Komatteru
Full Members
Basic User
***
Posts: 783

Joseiteki


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: May 26, 2006, 10:44:54 pm »

Blue.

I don't see that part about not copying characteristic settings of card text.  Here's the relevant rule:

Quote
502.40c The spell has the characteristics of the main spell, plus the text boxes of each of the spliced
cards. The spell doesn’t gain any other characteristics (name, mana cost, color, supertypes,
types, subtypes, etc.) of the spliced cards. Text copied onto the spell that refers to a card by
name refers to the spell on the stack, not the card from which the text was copied.
Example: Glacial Ray is a red card with splice onto Arcane that reads, “Glacial Ray
deals 2 damage to target creature or player.” Suppose Glacial Ray is spliced onto
Reach Through Mists, a blue spell. The spell is still blue, and Reach Through Mists
deals the damage. This means that the ability can target a creature with protection from
red and deal 2 damage to that creature.


Splice does not change any characteristics of the original spell.  It simply adds text to the box there.  Splicing on a card does not change its card type, color, converted mana cost, etc.  HOWEVER, the "Evermind is blue" text get copied as well.  By the above paragraph, when text that refers to a card name gets spliced onto a card, it refers to the card ON THE STACK, not the one it was spliced on to.  Therefore, the card on the stack will look like this

Glacial Ray
1R
Instant - Arcane
Glacial Ray deals 2 damage to target creature or player.
Draw a card.
*Glacial Ray* is blue.
« Last Edit: May 26, 2006, 10:54:50 pm by JDizzle » Logged
UR
Basic User
**
Posts: 396

budweisur@hotmail.com
View Profile
« Reply #2 on: May 27, 2006, 06:54:09 am »

What JDizzle said... this is from gatherer;

Aug 1, 2005 - If Evermind is in your hand, you can play its splice onto Arcane ability. The splice ability copies characteristic-setting abilities. This means that the text "Evermind is blue" is copied onto the Arcane spell, making it blue.
Logged
LordHomerCat
Full Members
Basic User
***
Posts: 1397

Lord+Homer+Cat
View Profile
« Reply #3 on: May 27, 2006, 11:34:08 am »

I believe that the issue is, when Evermind came out, they originally stated that the Ray-Splice-Evermind spell would NOT gain that part of the text (and become blue) for some reason, and that is when the Ask-The-Judge came out on the topic.  A short while later, they changed their minds, as it seemed dumb to only splice part of the text, and so the spell gained "~this~ is blue)."  They probably just didn't ever put a new question in Ask the Judge about it.
Logged

Team Meandeck

Team Serious

Quote from: spider
LordHomerCat is just mean, and isnt really justifying his statements very well, is he?
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.033 seconds with 17 queries.