Smmenen
|
 |
« on: January 20, 2007, 03:12:05 am » |
|
http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=mtgcom/daily/bd263Could there be a Vintage segment for the Invitational this year? Seems likely. It's been years since Vintage has been featured on the Invitationals and the Invitational is about Magic's broadest possibilities. The last paper invitational had the 5-color debacle and Vintage was always regarded as one of the most fun formats. I think there is a good chance we'll see three rounds of Vintage this year. Ironically, it will have less impact on the Vintage metagame than it ever has in the past.
|
|
« Last Edit: January 20, 2007, 03:32:59 am by Smmenen »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Moxlotus
Teh Absolut Ballz
Full Members
Basic User
  
Posts: 2199
Where the fuck are my pants?
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: January 20, 2007, 03:28:18 am » |
|
It's possible. If so, it'd have to be unlimited proxy I'd wager.
If there was a vintage format, here would be my prediction for deck breakdown
1-2 Fishies 0-1 Ichorid 2-3 Stax 3-4 Slaver The rest an even split between PitchLong and decks with 3+ Gifts in them.
However, I doubt there will be any Vintage played. Probably Legacy though.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
zeus-online
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: January 20, 2007, 03:39:12 am » |
|
Last time they played vintage at the invitational...wasn't that some completely awkward decks featuring cards as blastoderm? And barely even any recogniced archetypes (although finkel played keeper if i remember correctly)..Its true that vintage has evolved from back then, but i wonder if the players will still be playing piles...
/Zeus
|
|
|
Logged
|
The truth is an elephant described by three blind men.
|
|
|
Moxlotus
Teh Absolut Ballz
Full Members
Basic User
  
Posts: 2199
Where the fuck are my pants?
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: January 20, 2007, 04:49:12 am » |
|
Last time they played vintage at the invitational...wasn't that some completely awkward decks featuring cards as blastoderm? And barely even any recogniced archetypes (although finkel played keeper if i remember correctly)..Its true that vintage has evolved from back then, but i wonder if the players will still be playing piles...
/Zeus
Sigurd Eskelon got 2nd in the Vintage section with an Academy deck featuring 4 Time Spiral, Capsize, and Candelabra Mike Long took first featuring a Black/blue deck with hippies, hymns, duress, and blue power and other random stuff Lots of sligh a few keeper a mono blue shop deck w/ suchi, juggs, and 4 copy artifact, force, drain, etc. Maybe that wasn't the very last Vintage invitational, but that series of plays did exist sometime according to an old Duelist I have.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
LotusHead
Full Members
Basic User
  
Posts: 2785
Team Vacaville
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: January 20, 2007, 05:15:28 am » |
|
I read the MTG article twice now, and failed to spot the Vintage connection. Anyone care to spell it out for me?
Back when the Invitational was played with real cards, as opposed to on MTGO, Vintage was generally one of the formats. Hopefully, the tradition is restored! -Godder
I am far away from Sanctioned options, but still I want to see Wizards.Co support Vintage.
|
|
« Last Edit: January 20, 2007, 06:12:50 pm by Godder »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Hi-Val
Attractive and Successful
Adepts
Basic User
   
Posts: 1941
Reinforcing your negative body image
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: January 20, 2007, 12:28:27 pm » |
|
This is good because it herald's a return of MaRo's formats; he would do things like make new draft cards with old ones but with different costs. Is Morphling still a bomb at 4WWW? Will you play a 3U Necropotence? They'd take overcosted stuff and see if they could aggressively cost it too.
With the return to actual physical cards, there's the possibility for Vintage again, LotusHead. Also, pros have crazy access to power cards and stuff, especially for something like the invitational. I know it hasn't been said here but just putting it out there that it would be pretty insulting to think that the pros couldn't build, learn and play Vintage decks easily.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Team Meandeck: VOTE RON PAUL KILL YOUR PARENTS MAKE GOLD ILLEGAL Doug was really attractive to me.
|
|
|
UR
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: January 20, 2007, 01:44:03 pm » |
|
I know it hasn't been said here but just putting it out there that it would be pretty insulting to think that the pros couldn't build, learn and play Vintage decks easily. I've seen some of the Dutch pro's play Vintage and it was amazing how good they were with deck they'd never seen before. And this is the age of the internet, it really isn't very hard to come up with a winning list... anybody can do it so yeah... QFT.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Jacob Orlove
Official Time Traveller of TMD
Administrator
Basic User
    
Posts: 8074
When am I?
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: January 20, 2007, 06:01:39 pm » |
|
Last time they played vintage at the invitational...wasn't that some completely awkward decks featuring cards as blastoderm? And barely even any recogniced archetypes (although finkel played keeper if i remember correctly)..Its true that vintage has evolved from back then, but i wonder if the players will still be playing piles...
/Zeus
Sigurd Eskelon got 2nd in the Vintage section with an Academy deck featuring 4 Time Spiral, Capsize, and Candelabra Mike Long took first featuring a Black/blue deck with hippies, hymns, duress, and blue power and other random stuff Lots of sligh a few keeper a mono blue shop deck w/ suchi, juggs, and 4 copy artifact, force, drain, etc. Maybe that wasn't the very last Vintage invitational, but that series of plays did exist sometime according to an old Duelist I have. Yeah, I have that Duelist. There were later ones, though. My favorite saw most of the players with 4-Necro 4-Consult Trix. The Beyond Dominia regulars made fun of them, until they realized that Trix was infy broken (many months later). It was bizarre, though, because the pros couldn't even agree on a manabase, just that the deck beat everything in the format at that time.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Team Meandeck: O Lord, Guard my tongue from evil and my lips from speaking guile. To those who slander me, let me give no heed. May my soul be humble and forgiving to all.
|
|
|
Machinus
Keldon Ancient
Full Members
Basic User
  
Posts: 2516
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: January 20, 2007, 09:56:59 pm » |
|
This is the only good thing to come out of the butchering of the modo datbase. Kibler's technical loss was a load of bull.
|
|
|
Logged
|
T1: Arsenal
|
|
|
mrieff
Full Members
Basic User
  
Posts: 168
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: January 21, 2007, 04:57:50 am » |
|
I would bet that they'll do Legacy before Vintage  Both because of card availability and Wizards's superior support for Legacy in organized play such as GPs
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Vegeta2711
Bouken Desho Desho?
Full Members
Basic User
  
Posts: 1734
Nyah!
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: January 21, 2007, 05:26:03 am » |
|
I would bet that they'll do Legacy before Vintage  Both because of card availability and Wizards's superior support for Legacy in organized play such as GPs Actually that's probably a better reason about why they'd do Vintage. The invitationals used to be all about the wacky insane formats or at least standardized formats with a twist, that's what made them fun!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
silvernail
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: January 21, 2007, 06:03:19 pm » |
|
It'd be great to see them run vintage again, but i dont know if they will do normal formats or all wacky ones. Hard to say with Maro.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
freakish777
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: January 22, 2007, 11:13:25 pm » |
|
It'd be great to see them run both Legacy and Vintage. Why choose?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
MarkPharaoh
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: January 23, 2007, 12:37:06 am » |
|
Don't be so greedy 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
forests failed you
De Stijl
Adepts
Basic User
   
Posts: 2018
Venerable Saint
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: January 26, 2007, 10:41:20 am » |
|
I remember when Sideboard Magazine was around, during old old extended (dual lands and FOWs) that Sideboard Magazine did a pro tournament that was a four player team event. Seat a . Standard seat b. Block constructed seat c. Extended seat d. Vintage
I wish they had an event like that . It would be a really good opportunity for Vintage's best and the PTs best to interact.
By the way RIW won that event, with the most insane team EVER.
Mark Herberholtz Aaron Brieder Peter Jesual Pat Chapin
|
|
|
Logged
|
Grand Prix Boston 2012 Champion Follow me on Twitter: @BrianDeMars1
|
|
|
seer
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: January 26, 2007, 03:59:23 pm » |
|
I remember Olle Rades winning Vintage deck (well -- they had to use 5 cards from every expansion in their deck so they were a little constrained). He ended up beating Mike Long in the finals with a super broken Propserity deck running 4 Mana Crypts, 4 Mana Vaults, and 4 Hurkyl's Recall.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
forests failed you
De Stijl
Adepts
Basic User
   
Posts: 2018
Venerable Saint
|
 |
« Reply #16 on: January 29, 2007, 12:44:21 pm » |
|
Wow, four Mana Crypt seems 'fair.'
Seriously, I think it would be really cool to have an event where Vintage's best got to play along side the best constructed players. It would be a good learning experience for everybody involved, as well as good exposure for players on both sides to become more familiar with other formats.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Grand Prix Boston 2012 Champion Follow me on Twitter: @BrianDeMars1
|
|
|
seer
|
 |
« Reply #17 on: January 29, 2007, 01:04:13 pm » |
|
Here is the decklist, it is actually quite incredible considering how bad so many of the other "best" vintage decklists were at the time (hello, weisman.dec with fireball/abeyance as the win condition???). Also, remember he had to use 5 cards from each expansion or something along those lines.
Turbo-Mulligan Mana 1 Black Lotus 1 Mox Emerald 1 Mox Jet 1 Mox Pearl 1 Mox Ruby 1 Mox Sapphire 3 Lion's Eye Diamond 4 Mana Vault 4 Mana Crypt 1 Sol Ring 1 Library of Alexandria 4 City of Brass 1 Tropical Island 1 Underground Sea 1 Volcanic Island
Instants 1 Ancestral Recall 4 Force of Will 4 Hurkyl's Recall 4 Mystical Tutor
Sorceries 1 Balance 1 Braingeyser 1 Demonic Tutor 3 Prosperity 1 Recall 1 Regrowth 1 Time Walk 1 Timetwister 1 Wheel of Fortune
Artifact 4 Barbed Sextant 4 Black Vise 1 Mirror Universe 1 Snake Basket (FTW!)
SB 1 The Abyss 1 Amnesia 1 Death Speakers 1 Dust to Dust 1 Freewind Falcon 2 Hymn to Tourach 1 Icatian Infantry 1 Moat 1 Preacher 1 Sea Sprite 2 Serrated Arrows 1 Tormod's Crypt 1 Vodalian Soldiers
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mr. Nightmare
Full Members
Basic User
  
Posts: 537
Paper Tiger
|
 |
« Reply #18 on: January 29, 2007, 01:10:46 pm » |
|
Here is the decklist, it is actually quite incredible considering how bad so many of the other "best" vintage decklists were at the time (hello, weisman.dec with fireball/abeyance as the win condition???). Also, remember he had to use 5 cards from each expansion or something along those lines.
Imagine how much better that deck would have been if people had discovered how good Merchant Scroll is. It would have made Brainstorm playable.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
seer
|
 |
« Reply #19 on: January 29, 2007, 07:43:34 pm » |
|
Wasn't merchant scroll restricted at this time?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Smmenen
|
 |
« Reply #20 on: January 29, 2007, 08:27:03 pm » |
|
Scroll has never been restricted.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
asi
|
 |
« Reply #21 on: January 30, 2007, 10:55:29 am » |
|
Most people, probably including Wizards of the Coast, didn't even know Homelands existed. All the great format-warping cards of Homelands were discovered later, even Merchant Scroll wasn't considered that good at that time.
A vintage-event would make me really pay interest in the Invitational event again. I didn't watch (or care) about the past ones (except the cards the invitationalists made) because they played really obscure formats and I never had time or motivation to "get" what they did there. But Vintage would be nice, because you seldom see constructed-pros play T1 and because Vintage is a real format with interesting applications. Also, I'd like to see how Wizards sees the whole "Eternal"-part of the game.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|