well im not sure i agree with you that i couldve raced him in top8. While i did run 8 burn spells i think it wouldve been incredibly difficult to kill him that way. He pretty much just amassed too much card advantage for me to deal with.
Well, it definitely would have been difficult to burn him out, but there was no way you were going to win the creature/card race. That's why the choice you made was flawed. It pursued an avenue of victory that you were less likely to achieve than any other.
You cannot reason that burning him out would have been difficult and thus an unworthy endeavour. It was your best shot of winning, and the right decision was to play the game in a manner conducive to that specific plan.
As far as the swiss i did misplay quite a bit but I was taken by suprise by several things. I didnt see a wasteland until game 2. The main deck stifles were difficult. But the deck is extremely well prepared against 3 color thresh and i think it was an very good choice for this tourney. I just wonder how good is its goblins match. I would guess with so little removal it would be tough.
Well, regardless of those misplays, you also ran your Goose into his Werebear that was sitting on the brink of threshold, which was certainly not the right play. As for the goblins matchup, Peter had several rounds of play against that deck and I don't believe he lost a game. On the play, the deck has too many answers to Lackey, and on the draw, he only needs a Goose or a FoW to survive. The deck accumulates threats very quickly. I can't see goblins being a problem. In testing, the matchups went the same way.