This was my article for the TMD Promotion exam and, as such, I am hereby posting it.Let me start this by saying that I am not known as an excellent Stax player. I'm sure most people don't even know who I am. Moreover, most of my T8s and wins have come from behind a Mana Drain based deck. However, after taking a year-or-so break from Vintage, I came back to find my favorite Mana Drain based deck, Control Slaver, mostly dead from the restriction of Thirst for Knowledge.
When I decided to start attending tournaments again, I also had to decide what to play. I tested GW Beats, BUG Fish, Tezz, Vroman Oath, Steel City Vault, and more. I decided to give Stax a try for a few reasons: Firstly, I believe Null Rod to be the best hate card in the current format. You may not agree with me, but that's another discussion for another thread. Secondly, I have only played Stax in one tournament before the last few weeks. I believe that the ability to play all of the archetypes in a given format is necessary to understand how to play against them.
Firstly, this is the list that I played to T8 at the Meandeck Open:
4x Mishra's Workshop
4x Barbarian Ring
3x Mountain
4x Wasteland
1x Strip Mine
4x Bazaar of Baghdad
1x Tolarian Academy
1x Mox Emerald
1x Mox Sapphire
1x Mox Jet
1x Mox Pearl
1x Mox Ruby
1x Black Lotus
1x Mana Crypt
1x Sol Ring
1x Mana Vault
4x Goblin Welder
4x Chalice of the Void
4x Sphere of Resistance
4x Tangle Wire
4x Smokestack
4x Null Rod
4x Crucible of Worlds
1x Trinisphere
1x Memory Jar
Sideboard:
4x Tormod's Crypt
3x Shattering Spree
3x Tabernacle at Pendrell Vale
3x Greater Gargadon
2x Ensnaring Bridge
Keep in mind that I did not create this list. The link to the original list on Morphling.de can be found here:
http://morphling.de/top8decks.php?id=1151&highlight=7#place7Notice that I cut 3 cards from his SB and replaced them with 3x Greater Gargadon. After losing to Vroman in Lindenhurst the weekend before, a match where the winner would make T8, I didn't feel that I had enough hard answers to Oath in the sideboard. I discussed this a bit with Soly after the tournament, but was really convinced after talking to Doug Linn quite a bit a few days before the tournament. I didn't get a chance to play against Oath at the Meandeck Open, but in testing the Greater Gargadon has been very good. It is also splash damage against the UW beats/fish variants due to the amount of artifact hate they run, since you can sacrifice any artifacts they target for destruction to it. Suspending this guy with a chalice for 1 out also makes it very hard for beats/fish to answer it.
While this thread is more intended to focus on the interaction of Bazaar of Baghdad within the deck, I feel that some explanation of why I believe this list to be the best Stax list currently is in order:
Firstly, all of the lock pieces in the deck are cards that you want to see with regularity. I believe that running 4-ofs for all of your lock pieces provides higher consistency, while also reducing the effect of your opponent destroying one of your lock pieces, since you have a higher chance of drawing another.
Secondly, Twaun has posted an excellent primer to his B/R Stax deck which utilizes Dark Confidant. I think the deck is extremely well thought out and definitely has the ability to compete; however, I believe that MonoR is superior for a couple of reasons. With MonoR, there is no chance that you cannot cast one of your colored spells, provided that you have a color producing land. While, in testing, I haven't found this to be a huge problem, it has come up once or twice, due to having only a Barbarian Ring out or only a Cabal Pit out and drawing the opposite color.
I also prefer the MonoR list to Twaun's version because I don't like the damage taken from Dark Confidant. While I understand that the CMC of the deck is extremely low, I do not believe this damage is acceptable against the increasingly popular beatdown decks. I find that many games I am stabilizing below 5 life to win games. This actually happened to me twice at the Meandeck Open, once against GU Fish (2 life) and once against MonoR ShopAggro (1 life).
Lastly, I prefer this list because it runs 4x Bazaar of Baghdad, which I believe to be the best draw/discard engine in Stax. I also prefer to run 4x Barbarian Ring, which I will explain in greater detail later.
Bazaar is one of the most difficult cards in Vintage to use correctly. I wasn't suprised when Vroman, renowned as one of the best Stax players of all time, replied to Steve Menendian's post by saying that Bazaar of Baghdad is the most skill intensive card in Vintage. While I'm not 100% sure that I agree with him (Gifts may be harder), if Bazaar isn't first, its definitely second in my list.
Why is Bazaar so hard to use properly? The simple answer is that it is card
disadvantage. In Vintage we constantly discuss card advantage and similar theories behind what makes a card good or bad. If Bazaar of Baghdad wasn't a land, or cost mana to activate, it wouldn't be nearly as powerful as it is currently.
Keeping in mind that Bazaar is card disadvantage, let's take this one step further and talk about draw step disadvantage. Bazaar lets you see two more cards and potentially keep those cards if your hand size permits. It costs you 1 land drop one time and 1 draw step every time to see these cards. This is clearly giving an advantage to your opponent,
unless you have some added benefit from putting those cards into the graveyard. More on that in a bit.
So when is the correct time to activate your Bazaar? This is the hardest question that I had to answer when testing a deck with 4x Bazaar in it. Firstly, to correctly activate Bazaar, I believe that you need to know your deck's list inside and out. We have already mentioned that you are putting yourself at a disadvantage by losing a card, and effectively nullifying a draw step. However, Bazaar can be extremely potent when searching for that lock piece you desperately need.
To correctly use Bazaar, you need to ask yourself these questions before you tap it, "What am I looking for? Will I care about discarding any of these cards?" The answer to your first question is mainly based upon your current board position, your opponent's board position, and your cards in hand. One example that I remember from the Meandeck Open (my memory with these things is terrible, so it might not be 100% accurate):
I was playing against MonoR ShopAggro. I remember having, in play: Tangle Wire, Smokestack (1 counter), 2 mox, Crucible, and a Mountain. I also remember having no lands in the graveyard. My hand was Smokestax, Crucible, and Bazaar. I decided to play Bazaar, activate it, and hope to see a welder. I didn't mind pitching my Smokestack, since I already had one active on the board. My thought process here was that if I saw the Welder, I could basically lock him out of the game by ramping the Smokestack to 2 after sacrificing 1 permanent next turn. Then, I could weld it for the other Smokestack in the graveyard on his EOT and set it to 1, which would give me a 2 permanent advantage, which is huge in the Shop mirror. On the other hand, I could also get a Wasteland or Strip Mine, which also would immediately lock him out of the game, due to the amount of non-basics that Shop decks run. I ended up getting the Welder and I handily won the game 2-3 turns later after welding the chalice back in for 0.
Correct activation of Bazaar is also based upon information that is harder to calculate. "How soon do I need to see the card I'm looking for?" If you can take an extra turn to find the answer you need, it may be more beneficial to wait the extra turn to see what you draw. On the other hand, if you have 4 cards in hand that you don't mind losing, you may want to activate earlier. This is highly based upon how long you think you can survive.
In this Stax build, Bazaar has obvious synergies with Goblin Welder and Crucible of Worlds. In fact, when I have one or both in play, I will often activate it with 0 cards in hand, just hoping for that last lock piece I need, or to find the Strip Mine which almost always gets the concession when you have a Crucible with other lock pieces in play. When doing this, obviously you will activate it at your opponent's EOT; however, make sure you do it again during your upkeep, otherwise you may draw a card you want to hold and will miss this second activation.
Furthermore, the synergy with Barbarian Ring, in this list, is something that I believe is largely missed. There is no doubt about it: Dark Confidant and Goblin Welder are bad cards for Stax to see on the other side of the table. Goblin Welder is quite obvious. Dark Confidant beats for 2 every turn, which dwindles your life resource, something that Stax largely uses. Honestly, I feel that the lands that he draws for the opponent is more detrimental to my plan than anything.
With Dark Confidant on the table, you can plan for your opponent to make a land drop every other turn. Think about what this means. If every deck ran 30 lands in Vintage, how good would Smokestack or Tangle Wire be? Terrible. On top of that, at least 50% of Null Rod's power comes from shutting down Moxen, which is lessened every time your opponent makes a land drop. Bazaar gets you threshold much earlier, to use your
uncounterable answer to Dark Confidant and Goblin Welder. This is an extremely important part of the deck that I think deserves more discussion.
In one of my games, I had 4 cards in the graveyard. I had Barbarian Ring in hand, a Bazaar on the table, and a mountain. I don't remember exactly the gamestate, but my opponent had just cast Goblin Welder and it was going to wreck my soft-lock next turn. I drew for the turn; discarded 3 cards, giving myself threshold; played Barbarian Ring; and killed the Welder. If I hadn't answered Welder this turn, I'm sure I would have lost the game, and the match.
Overall, Bazaar of Baghdad remains an extremely difficult card to utilize to its fullest potential. I do not believe that I have mastered it fully and continue to find situations where I activate it incorrectly or where I find that I should have activated it. In the end, I hope this has helped share some of my findings with you.