|
Guli
|
 |
« on: July 27, 2011, 04:00:05 am » |
|
Maddock Feeg    You may pay 1 life and exile a green or white creature card from your hand rather than pay Maddock Feeg’s mana cost. Counter target non-creature spell. Shhhhh, it will be all right. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Delha
Full Members
Basic User
Posts: 1271
|
|
« Reply #1 on: July 27, 2011, 12:12:47 pm » |
|
Not a chance.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I suppose it's mostly the thought that this format is just one big Mistake; and not even a very sophisticated one at that.
Much like humanity itself. |
|
|
|
Joblin Velder
|
|
« Reply #2 on: July 27, 2011, 05:56:25 pm » |
|
Some days I wonder if Guli is T00l or brassman trolling.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Team Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday: I will pee all over myself then we'll see who will end up looking bad.
|
|
|
|
Wagner
|
|
« Reply #3 on: July 28, 2011, 04:33:54 am » |
|
This is wrong with the color-pie on so many levels.
Might work better by forcing you to put a creature from your hand under opponent's control, and even there it's still very iffy.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Guli
|
|
« Reply #4 on: July 28, 2011, 11:56:36 am » |
|
Some days I wonder if Guli is T00l or brassman trolling.
Im sure you do, people recognize in others what they do themselves. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Guli
|
|
« Reply #5 on: July 28, 2011, 11:58:25 am » |
|
Not a chance.
Ok then white creature and make it ? White has gotten counter spells! Would that be more acceptable? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Wagner
|
|
« Reply #6 on: July 28, 2011, 12:15:54 pm » |
|
Not a chance.
Ok then white creature and make it ? White has gotten counter spells! Would that be more acceptable? As far as I know, white has only gotten 1 counterspell so far, Illumination. And white is not the color associated with creatures. I don't think you can make this idea viable. Im sure you do, people recognize in others what they do themselves. I never heard that before. Is it a real saying or did you just make it up? If you made it up, does it mean that I also like to make things up since I recognized it? Because I totally do that  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Joblin Velder
|
|
« Reply #7 on: July 28, 2011, 12:40:50 pm » |
|
Did I just get I-know-you-are-but-what-am-I'd?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Team Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday: I will pee all over myself then we'll see who will end up looking bad.
|
|
|
Delha
Full Members
Basic User
Posts: 1271
|
|
« Reply #8 on: July 28, 2011, 12:50:05 pm » |
|
Not a chance. Ok then white creature and make it ? White has gotten counter spells! Would that be more acceptable? No. Here's why this is a problem, since you clearly don't understand. This is a cheap, efficent, and broad counterspell that is not blue. That flies in the face of the color pie. White has indeed had counterspells. Pretty much all of them have cost or sucked ass (generally by being extremely narrow). Can you name a single monowhite counterspell that's even half as good as this? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I suppose it's mostly the thought that this format is just one big Mistake; and not even a very sophisticated one at that.
Much like humanity itself. |
|
|
|
Slayn001
|
|
« Reply #9 on: July 28, 2011, 01:11:39 pm » |
|
Not a chance.
Ok then white creature and make it ? White has gotten counter spells! Would that be more acceptable? As far as I know, white has only gotten 1 counterspell so far, Illumination. And white is not the color associated with creatures. I don't think you can make this idea viable.
then you don't know magic very well. it took me about 5 seconds to think of both tithe and absorb.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Team Topdeck Games.
|
|
|
Delha
Full Members
Basic User
Posts: 1271
|
|
« Reply #10 on: July 28, 2011, 01:32:11 pm » |
|
As far as I know, white has only gotten 1 counterspell so far, Illumination.
And white is not the color associated with creatures. I don't think you can make this idea viable. then you don't know magic very well. it took me about 5 seconds to think of both tithe and absorb. Not remembering every single crappy counter ever printed doesn't make one bad at Magic. Also, Absorb is not just "White", it is "Blue-White". That difference means worlds. Edit: Fixed quote tags. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: July 28, 2011, 03:13:16 pm by Delha »
|
Logged
|
I suppose it's mostly the thought that this format is just one big Mistake; and not even a very sophisticated one at that.
Much like humanity itself. |
|
|
MaximumCDawg
Full Members
Basic User
Posts: 2172
|
|
« Reply #11 on: July 28, 2011, 01:57:23 pm » |
|
Not a chance. Ok then white creature and make it ? White has gotten counter spells! Would that be more acceptable? No. Here's why this is a problem, since you clearly don't understand. This is a cheap, efficent, and broad counterspell that is not blue. That flies in the face of the color pie. White has indeed had counterspells. Pretty much all of them have cost or sucked ass (generally by being extremely narrow). Can you name a single monowhite counterspell that's even half as good as this? Dawn Charm Lapse of Certainty Mana Tithe Rebuff the Wicked The only sorta ok one is Mana Tithe. I've run that in an aggro deck before, and its benefit comes because it takes the opponent completely by suprirse. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Delha
Full Members
Basic User
Posts: 1271
|
|
« Reply #12 on: July 28, 2011, 03:17:34 pm » |
|
The only sorta ok one is Mana Tithe. I've run that in an aggro deck before, and its benefit comes because it takes the opponent completely by suprirse. Yeah. I figured being mostly useless after the first few turns qualifies as "narrow". |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I suppose it's mostly the thought that this format is just one big Mistake; and not even a very sophisticated one at that.
Much like humanity itself. |
|
|
|
Darkenslight
|
|
« Reply #13 on: August 07, 2011, 12:51:32 pm » |
|
You might be able to get away with it if it says, that targets you or a permanent you control".
And even then, it's iffy.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Delha
Full Members
Basic User
Posts: 1271
|
|
« Reply #14 on: August 08, 2011, 12:43:54 pm » |
|
You might be able to get away with it if it says, that targets you or a permanent you control".
And even then, it's iffy. Adding that clause makes it fine in my book. It also probably weakens it to the point of no longer accomplishing what the OP intended. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I suppose it's mostly the thought that this format is just one big Mistake; and not even a very sophisticated one at that.
Much like humanity itself. |
|
|
|
