Show Posts
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4
|
1
|
Eternal Formats / Global Vintage Tournament Reports and Results / Re: [Videos + Top8 decklists]: LCV6 - Berga 24/4/2010 (54 players)
|
on: May 18, 2010, 04:01:31 am
|
I believe it's an excellent idea and it shouldn't be that hard to do with Final Cut. It might require 2 people to have this done (to write down what every player draws).
- HP Counts - Cards in Hand -
That would be insanely hard! To give you an example, the last video you posted was 9 minutes and 30 seconds. Every second is comprised of 10 frames. and every minute is comprised of 60 seconds. So for every minute of video you have, you will have to place scores and hand sizes on 600 frames. So for your last video, you would of had to rewrite 5700 frames. It takes my editor close to two weeks to do put that much text on that many frames, and he does this for a living. I don't want to sound like I am discouraging you, but it is a lot of tedious work. I'm pretty sure programs exist where you don't have to label each frame and that they default to the next one until you're ready to make a change. Not that I know of... But if it does, let me know. That'll definitely make my editors job a hell of a lot easier.
|
|
|
2
|
Eternal Formats / Global Vintage Tournament Reports and Results / Re: [Videos + Top8 decklists]: LCV6 - Berga 24/4/2010 (54 players)
|
on: May 18, 2010, 03:42:19 am
|
I believe it's an excellent idea and it shouldn't be that hard to do with Final Cut. It might require 2 people to have this done (to write down what every player draws).
- HP Counts - Cards in Hand -
That would be insanely hard! To give you an example, the last video you posted was 9 minutes and 30 seconds. Every second is comprised of 10 frames. and every minute is comprised of 60 seconds. So for every minute of video you have, you will have to place scores and hand sizes on 600 frames. So for your last video, you would of had to rewrite 5700 frames. It takes my editor close to two weeks to do put that much text on that many frames, and he does this for a living. I don't want to sound like I am discouraging you, but it is a lot of tedious work.
|
|
|
3
|
Eternal Formats / Global Vintage Tournament Reports and Results / Re: [Videos]: LCV6 - Berga 24/4/2010 (54 players)
|
on: May 13, 2010, 05:33:33 pm
|
Thank you very much for the advices! I'll try Final Cut as soon as I get my hands on it. The poing about the light is also important, I felt like moving all the time to avoid the reflexes from the cards. I guess it would it be better to use a tripod, but then you don't get to see the hands and draws. What do you guys prefer?
A tripod won't make any difference when it comes to lighting; the reflection is actually the florescent giving you problems. Unlike other light sources, florescent is made to bounce harder to give you more light. That is why most florescents needs a cover. That is also why everything we use on set needs reflectors: to keep it from bouncing into oblivion. The only thing stronger than a florescent light is natural sunlight. What a tripod will help with is shakiness. Its easier to focus with a tripod because you are not constantly moving the camera.
|
|
|
6
|
Eternal Formats / Global Vintage Tournament Reports and Results / Re: Pittsburgh Throwback Vintage Results -Mr. Nice Guy Games
|
on: May 03, 2010, 07:25:34 pm
|
After looking at the decklists, this looks like it would have been an insanely fun event to attend. Time Elemental and Primitive Justice? How awesome is that?
I found the fact that most of these list didn't run the full set of Forces to me more jarring than the presence of those cards, lol. At least Drain still earned its spot. This format looks insanely fun. I might have to get a couple friends together to track it up here. Thanks for posting the results ^.^ You definitely got my interest, and hopefully I can make the next one (work blew my philly game day weekend, so its bound to blow another planned weekend :-/ )
|
|
|
7
|
Eternal Formats / Global Vintage Tournament Reports and Results / Re: [Videos]: LCV6 - Berga 24/4/2010 (54 players)
|
on: April 28, 2010, 08:33:51 am
|
Regarding the videos, I still have 6 more to edit, so I have a lot of of margin for practice. I'm a total editing n0_0b  I use the iMovie aplication that came with my laptop. If someone knows a better software, I'd love to try it. Any kind of suggestions will be appreciated, so don't be shy! If you can afford it (and you run a mac), Final Cut is THE best editing software you can get. Every cut has its own tab, which makes it super fast to use while still letting you mouse click through everything for the editing noob like yourself. Its easier to fade with Final Cut too, so you don't have to separate the games with individual videos. Oh, and color correction helps when you are either in a room full of florescent light (note: cameras HATE florescent light) or their is not enough lights in the room period. That aspect of editing takes a little more time to pick up, but once you knock it out, your videos will look amazing. If you run a PC, I'm afraid you are out of luck. PCs blow when it comes to editing software. Although it isn't impossible to come out with a good quality video (Evan Erwin himself uses iMovie), but its not gonna have the same crispness as Final Cut can offer you.
|
|
|
9
|
Eternal Formats / Global Vintage Tournament Reports and Results / Re: N.Y.S.E. VII - Official Report
|
on: March 22, 2010, 08:50:07 am
|
I think most players in Vintage aren't really metagamed for fliers. Bauer, if you rocked 20 Flying Men, 20 Unstable Mutation and 20 Islands I'd totally get wrecked.
-7 Flying Men, -7 Unstable Mutations, +14 Force of Will Although I don't go to a lot of these, I am really impressed with how the meta-game is involving. It only seems like yesterday that Time Vault was dominating everywhere. But now it looks like the Time Vault decks need to find a new approach in the meta-game. Congrats to the top 8 and to the meta-game evolutions.
|
|
|
10
|
Eternal Formats / Eternal Article Discussion / Re: [Free Article] The City of Zombie Love
|
on: March 02, 2010, 10:56:06 am
|
So for games 3 against Oath and Tez, what do you side out to bring the Chalices back in (obviously keeping in mind what kind of hate they already presented to you)? What if they are running a smattering of hate cards like you have been suggesting in the last couple months? Do you miss Serenity? That card is an absolute blow out against Stax!
Great article though ^.^ And I agree with everything you said about dredge: It is a very hard deck to hate while still presenting the pilot many challenges on his/her own. I played a Dredge deck this weekend just 5 cards shy of Mark's deck, and I can honestly say in all of the games I lost, I made a mistake. Even Mark said he made a few mistakes this weekend too. If that is not proof that Dredge is a tactical deck, I don't know what is. Good job again.
|
|
|
11
|
Archives / Tournament Announcement Forum / Re: [Tournament] THE PHILLY OPEN V - 2/27 & 2/28! T1 & Extended! $4,000+ in priz
|
on: February 28, 2010, 04:49:37 pm
|
I'm going to write up a tournament report for SCG, and then hopefully get all the decklists from Nick for further analysis. I think the metagame from this one can go a long way towards helping us frame our understanding of Vintage at the moment.
I have a few questions, mainly pertaining to your sideboard, but I will wait to see the article. Congrats on another good finish and on your string of good articles. And lastly, congrats to Nick Coss for hosting these amazing events.
|
|
|
13
|
Archives / Tournament Announcement Forum / Re: Who wants to revisit the GUSH META March 7 and win a MOX SAPPHIRE in Milwauk
|
on: February 26, 2010, 10:12:01 pm
|
Very cool idea. My favorite thing about Vintage is deckbuilding, so I think this is great.
Recalling some discussions in the past on theory related the B&R list, I would just like to say that I've always wished Vintage worked like this. Not the Gush era specifically, just a constantly shifting B&R list. The massive card pool was always bound to bottleneck the format, and changing the rules at a frequency that is inverse to the pool size is the only way to keep things interesting.
This is what I love about some of the online TCGs I play currently... They have a constantly shifting banned list that changes every week based off player votes. And players gain votes based on how well they do in events. Either way, I really like these ideas and I wish I live closer (or it was closer to me.) I currently have off that day, but I have to work Sunday morning (which would be hell on the travel.) I hope you get a great turn out though along with some amazing tournament reports ^.^
|
|
|
15
|
Archives / Tournament Announcement Forum / Re: N.Y.S.E. V - 1/23/10 - Black Lotus Tournament
|
on: January 05, 2010, 01:40:36 pm
|
In my expirience in the Basque Vintage Lige we see that giving too much point to the top 8 disturbs the rerala regularity of some players, because you can make top9 at 3 tournaments, and some one tyhat justa make top 8 at 2 and goes very bad in one can have the same or more points than the top 9 guy. I porpose you to don,t give so much point for going in the top8, only 1 point for being in, and extra point for passing to semi-finals, one more for going to the final, and maybe 2 more for winning, so it would be like this: 1st: +5 2nd: +3 3-4th: +2 5-8th: +1
Only one opinion, really, what we have was a real lige, and at the end of the an invitational torunamente so only the first 22 (and the all that have the same points as him, and all torunament champions too) of the regular ligue can go. This last tournamnet was free, we had 15 euros tournament fee, and from this 2 euros of each player gous for the final torunament prize and we have some prize to for the first 3 or 4 players in the regular leagu (it depends on assistance and in the budget that we had for the both prizes support).
Considering the regularity I get ninth place, I like this ^.^ I also like the structure both Nick's are supporting now though. So I'm happy with either.
|
|
|
18
|
Vintage Community Discussion / General Community Discussion / Re: My documentary film
|
on: December 27, 2009, 02:11:35 am
|
As someone who use to work for a film festival, I can honestly tell you that it is a daunting task to make it in. Most small festivals have a crew of at most 12 people, all doing multiple jobs. In the two years that I have watched independent films, I have watched close to 1000 films and can probably say only 10 of them were really worth watching. My festival has only accepted a total of 400 movies in its two years of running (which is a lot, I know... But we have several criteria that we grade things on.)
As for my suggestions: Make sure your content is interesting. As a documentary, your content has to be deep while providing outlets to making your audience want more. Try not to veer too far off the path. I have seen one documentary where the camera crew was messing around for ten minutes in the middle of a movie, giving me nothing on the actual subject of the movie. Also, try to avoid making your documentary longer than an hour and a half. Most audiences refuse to sit through a documentary that is longer than that. And more often than not, they are instantly declined without even watching. I can tell you for a fact that Sundance follows this criteria, and it wouldn't surprise me if more than half the running festivals are doing the same thing.
Good luck man. Its a harsh world, but a rewarding one if you spend your time well ^.^
|
|
|
19
|
Archives / Tournament Announcement Forum / Re: N.Y.S.E. IV - 12/19 - Unlimited Time Walk Tourney
|
on: December 20, 2009, 03:18:55 am
|
I think the real prize was the 9th place Wolf Shirt provided by Nick Coss. I'd rather have one of those instead of any other prize.
I seriously missed out on a Wolf Shirt? I might have been able to cure my Aids problem ;-; I could have made it, but decided against going for the better judgment of my wallet and the fact that I haven't played a single game of Vintage since the week before the last Philly Open... I didn't feel up for playing at all Friday, so it was probably for the better. Congrats to whoever won my 9th place prize though!
|
|
|
20
|
Eternal Formats / Eternal Article Discussion / Re: [Free Article] My Favorite Things: 2009
|
on: December 16, 2009, 10:13:07 am
|
On a business related point, I don't know that I would pay a great deal of attention to the lists that the 5CStax decks played at Philly IV. I don't say this because none of us made the top 8, but because I feel that there were a few flaws in our conception of what the metagame would be. I know that, personally, I didn't have as much hate for Oath as I would have liked.
As you noted, Dredge was 6% of the field. Still, even with this in mind, I think that the 5CStax decks out there have to react to Dredge's recent victories by remaining at a high state of readiness for the match. This means somewhere in the neighborhood of eight cards to be brought in for games two and three, at least. Efforts should be made to find multifunctional hate that works well, and works well in multiple matches.
On top of that, you also have to consider the fact that Tez is still very much active in our metagame. I did this yesterday as I was attempting to build a "The Deck" fixed for our meta, so I'll post it here. This is a short list of all the arch types and how often they top 8ed in our area, and where they placed in the top 8 (2 Blue Bell events, NYSE 3, and the Philly Open 4) Tez (12) 2 2 2 2 3 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 Dredge (4) 1 3 3 5 Aggro/Fish Varients (3) 1 1 5 Oath (3) 1 3 5 Stax (2) 3 5 Red Shop Aggro (2) 3 5 TPS (2) 5 5 Steel City (1) 3 Counterbalance (1) 5 Painter (1) 5 Landstill (1) 5 Dragon into Tez (1) 5 Clearly, Tez is STILL the metagame favorite, despite the restriction of Thirst for Knowledge. Of course, this doesn't mean its the best deck to win the whole thing. But you still need to prepare for it, despite all the hype based around Oath and Dredge (which is clearly deserved, as the recent developments on those decks are pretty nuts.) So if your dedicating 8 sideboard slots to Dredge, you need to think about where the rest of your slots are going to go. I'm not well versed in the making of a stax list, but I would imagine you definitely have a lot of homework when it comes to sideboarding. There really is no pleasing some people... hopefully I'm not the only one that thinks its funny that my personal list of my personal favorites is getting criticized as "wrong". By the way, I'm quoting this in my sig... That was well worth the epic lawlz.
|
|
|
23
|
Eternal Formats / Eternal Article Discussion / Re: [Free Article] A Snapshot of Modern Vintage
|
on: December 07, 2009, 03:20:41 pm
|
I was thouroughly disappointed by a distinct lack of charts and graphs. I don't feel as though enough time was placed into developing this kind of article. Along with the points others made i feel that the following topics could've been analyzed:
1) I feel as though the weather could've been touched upon. Over a long course of statistical analysis we can notice if certain deck pilots play better during different temperatures/climates.
2) A study into the eating habits of vintage players can easily be correlated with a mid-tournament survey. I'd wager that tezz pilots would have less time to eat between round (considering how frustrating a gifts pile is to make when you've drawn one of the standard pile inclusions), and would learn toward some meager sustinence like crackers or a half a sandwich. Whereas I fully expect Stax pilots to be the guys haumphing down a grease truck sandwich after dropping 3 "lock" pieces down and hoping that is enough to ensure they're the only one playing magic in their match. Wait what's that? Stax lost the dieroll and his opponent had 2 moxes and a basic? Sorry for challenging your right to gorge, allmighty owner of Mishra's Workshop. My sincerest apologies.
2b) Extending...This same survey could include an option to include a rough guess at the player's IQ. I'd love to see the results of comparative archetype IQ analysis. Tezz vs Dredge. Stax vs Dredge. Dredge vs Ponies. Waffles vs Pancakes. All seem like interesting outcomes.
I can't help but agree with this statement... Since I made my transition from dedicated Dredge player to dedicated Time Vault player, I noticed that my diet has changed as well. No longer do I live in the days where I can go to Wawa and order a decent size lunch, followed by a night of whatever alcahol I can get my greedy hands on. Now my lunch looks like it could have been the remeants of an abortion. As far as the IQ is concerned, I think Mark Hournang can prove that Dredge players drink more than Tez players, but that has yet to be proven on the Stax players. Stax vs Dredge drinking teams has yet to be playtested. But if you want proof that Dregde drinks more than Tez, just look at the photos in Mark Hournang's facebook. Particularly, his current profile pic. Is that enough proof? P.S. Love ya Marky lol. In seriousness, I like Wmagzoo7's suggestion, but I feel like that could be a seperate article. Its not like people are not getting to know the major players in our area, much like people are getting to know the Ohio crew in Menendian's article. Something like this could help a new and/or experienced player get into the mind set of our local champions. Kind of like how the deck techs on Wizards coverage helps a player understand the ins and outs of the best performing decks. But again, it should be a different article. Good job Matt!
|
|
|
26
|
Eternal Formats / Bazaar-Based Decks / Re: Bloodghasted Ichorid Primer- Looking to the future
|
on: December 02, 2009, 01:03:04 pm
|
If it was nothing BUT Ichorid (at least thats what 9 out of 12 decks will dictate to me), I would think about going the same route as you are... It is as everyone has said previously, Leyline is the worst card to play against ourselves. So its easily the best card for that metagame. I would probably try something else in the Chalice spot though, possible Breakthrough to help make the Force plan more consistent.
|
|
|
28
|
Eternal Formats / Bazaar-Based Decks / Re: Bloodghasted Ichorid Primer- Looking to the future
|
on: December 01, 2009, 12:35:45 pm
|
I completely agree with your statements regarding Ichorid game one. However, I am convinced Ichorid adds more to the deck in games two and three. It maybe a metagame/regional difference but there are a lot of Traps running around out here so the Ichorids help add to the clock by triggering bridges and help have a charged graveyard if you had a crypt, trap, or relic played against you. Also you are not going to consistently dredge into the ample amount of threats to put the clock on post board and the Ichorids will help that. Sure you usually want to bounce the threat and go to work as fast as possible, but it doesn't always work like that. In all of my testing and games I have never had a problem with finding dredgers with Ichorid, even with a needle online and I believe the Ichorids add to the deck post board.
If both of you guys feel like the Ichorids game 1 are moot, why don't you play the Savages main over them? Swap the cards around. This way, if you don't hit a second land while Powdering away, you have a chance to dredge into your Savages instead of relying on a subpar card to get you there. And having the Ichorids in the board will still give you the resiliency that you are looking for in games 2 and 3. It would look something like this: 2 Ichorid 1 Iona 1 Angel of Despair 4 Force of Will 4 Chain of Vapor 3 Echoing Truth I would keep the 3rd Ichorid in the main anyway to add redundancy to the main deck (essentially, returning him when you need to.)
|
|
|
29
|
Eternal Formats / Bazaar-Based Decks / Re: Bloodghasted Ichorid Primer- Looking to the future
|
on: November 24, 2009, 02:46:30 pm
|
In regards to Manaless Ichorid:
Why Echoing Truth? Isn't that card too slow of a hate card to be running in dredge? Wouldn't it be faster to run more specific hate cards like Wispmare, Ingot Chewer, Darkblast, or Greater Gargadon? I understand Dakmor Salvage helps with the casting cost problem, and I do understand that most of his mana base is blue sources, but 2 mana just looks too slow for dredge. (Even if you are slowing your clock game 2.)
In regards to Unmask in the board in general:
When we talked over the phone, you said that you NEVER sided Unmask in. What would you suggest for replacements for it? How would you incorporate it into your current sideboard shell? I'm very positive this will change your sideboard technique, and I'm sure it'll help people on the forum to understand this advancement in dredge (as most primers are suppose to address the things you discovered in testing.)
|
|
|
30
|
Eternal Formats / Global Vintage Tournament Reports and Results / Re: THE OFFICIAL Philly Open 4 T.O. Report - Decklists, Metagame, & More!
|
on: November 23, 2009, 04:39:43 pm
|
The Vintage event would have broke 70 if my buddy didn't get into a car accident with a drunk driver ;-; At least no one got hurt and the idiot got locked up.
Congrats to Mark for winning the whole shebang! I know you worked your ass off to get a faster variant of dredge working, and it obviously worked from your results. Glad that I could have a helping hand in the development of your deck ^.^ Mad props yo! I hope you don't continue this trend of playing your friends in the semi-finals though lol. You house us all!
Congrats to Mykie as well! Two straight top 8s is pretty good man. Keep up the good work.
|
|
|
|