Show Posts
|
Pages: [1] 2
|
4
|
Eternal Formats / Blue-Based Control / Re: UB Standing Depths
|
on: February 11, 2016, 03:48:41 pm
|
Yeah, fair enough. Your rationalizations are all very logical. I have played the deck a few more times now (in the tournament practice room as I don't have the time for dailies) and I really like it. I haven't added Null Rods yet as I want to play your list a lot more first but I really like how the deck feels now.
My current list is the same as yours from yesterday except with a Vampiric Tutor instead of one Mindbreak Trap. Also a miser's Null Rod in the board because I only own one Crucible of Worlds.
I am now thinking that I need to pick up Dark Depths (and Urborgs) in paper. And regretting that I sold the ones that I had five or six years ago.
|
|
|
6
|
Eternal Formats / Blue-Based Control / Re: UB Standing Depths
|
on: February 10, 2016, 04:48:41 am
|
I would cut Top and one Mindbreak Trap and I'm not sure what else. Maybe keep it at two Null Rods and cut Tolaria West, Preordain or Hexmage for Vampiric Tutor? Don't know. I would also cut a basic Island for either Basic Swamp or one more Sea.
Explosives are great and would be missed for sure. Maybe 1 Hurkyls and either Illness in the Ranks or Virulent Plague? If Nihil also has to go maybe Leyline of the Void (though 3 feels weird), Jailer or Ravenous Trap.
|
|
|
7
|
Eternal Formats / Blue-Based Control / Re: UB Standing Depths
|
on: February 09, 2016, 05:23:11 pm
|
I have just now played one match with this deck in the tournament practice room and since I won it I'm pretty much an expert. I feel like this could be a Null Rod deck. This would help the already potent secondary plan to grind opponents down. Replacements for the one Top and the Spellbombs and Explosives in the board feel pretty easy to come up with.
|
|
|
11
|
Eternal Formats / Miscellaneous / Re: Tolarian Academy Combo
|
on: February 04, 2016, 10:16:44 pm
|
These are both reasonable suggestions. The problem is the color. You could potentially go 5c but the main issue is that multiples of the above cards are dead. Expedition Maps at least power your Academy (which translates into a lot of mana if you untap it multiple times with MoM). I'd be more ok with Sylvan Scrying than Crop Rotation due to the prevalence of Misstep and getting your Crop Rotation countered is a 2-for-1. Mostly though, Maps boost your artifact count. You want a lot of them in your deck to power your Academy.
They aren't dead cards if they go to get a Minamo (or Deserted Temple!) or something. Crop Rotation as a possible two for one is a potential issue but it lets you have more than one land drop a turn (kind of...) and i would think it would be much more explosive mid-combo than either Sylvan Scrying or Expedition Map. One option to make this work would be to swap Green for Red entirely. You'll lose the utility of Dack in the main (and Wheel), but you can add more consistency by adding Sylvan Library and Green has spells that can replace the Red artifact hate in the board as well.
I agree with that Red feels cuttable. You could go BUG and have a reasonably solid mana base. Why? Living wish was just awful for Randy.
Yeah, it was awful for Randy. Blue and Blue/Green Belcher is actually a deck that I've played and I haven't liked Living Wish very much either.
|
|
|
12
|
Eternal Formats / Miscellaneous / Re: Tolarian Academy Combo
|
on: February 04, 2016, 05:34:46 pm
|
I haven't played this deck at all and know nothing. Ok, that part aside if its all about finding Academy how about Crop Rotation or Sylvan Scrying as they work through Null Rod/Stony Silence?
|
|
|
15
|
Vintage Community Discussion / General Community Discussion / Re: Vintage Super League: Who Would You Like to See?
|
on: December 10, 2015, 11:23:14 am
|
Please don't let me impact you that way.
There's an incredible Vince Lombardi quote that Forino has etched into my mind:
"Perfection is not attainable, but if we chase perfection, we can catch excellence."
I have a lot of work to do, and the VSL play-in tournament showed me where I needed to do my work. I mulligan aggressively, as I think everyone has now seen, and my mistakes weren't in my mulligans, but in card interactions that I had not spent enough time with.
We all make mistakes, and I promise that I made several throughout that event (though nothing major until it mattered most). An article on mistakes would be excellent. We all make boneheaded plays; learning from those plays is what matters most.
Well said. You had a great run and I think you should be really proud of that. I would love to see you take down the next play-in tournament, whenever that is.
|
|
|
18
|
Eternal Formats / Blue-Based Control / Re: Why play Bomberman? (NE US)
|
on: November 14, 2015, 02:19:53 am
|
I have been experimenting with both UWR and Esper Bomberman and I think I like the Esper version a little better. I was only playing one or two Dacks, a Pyroblast and Pyrite Spellbomb for red in the maindeck so I don't feel like I have missed it too much. My Esper list has Vamp and Demonic Tutors, Nihil Spellbomb, Tasigur and I'm trying out two Dark Confidant. Not sure if it's good or not but so far it feels decent. I haven't played Bomberman much overall so and my sample size is small so I'm not sure if I trust my judgement yet. If anyone has any thoughts or feedback on my list I'd love to hear it. Thanks.
* 16 lands 2 - Cavern of Souls 1 - Library of Alexandria 1 - Tolarian Academy 1 - Island 3 - Tundra 3 - Underground Sea 4 - Flooded Strand 1 - Polluted Delta
* 8 other mana 1 - Black Lotus 5 - Moxen 1 - Mana Crypt 1 - Sol Ring
2 - Swords to Plowshares 2 - Mental Misstep 1 - Ancestral Recall 1 - Brainstorm 1 - Ponder 1 - Flusterstorm 1 - Vampiric Tutor 1 - Nihil Spellbomb 1 - Sensei's Divining Top
2 - Jace, Vryn's Prodigy 1 - Time Walk 2 - Mana Drain 1 - Demonic Tutor 2 - Dark Confidant
2 - Monastery Mentor 4 - Thirst for Knowledge 2 - Trinket Mage
2 - Auriok Salvagers 1 - Jace, the Mind Sculptor
4 - Force of Will
1 - Tasigur, the Golden Fang
1- Repeal 1 - Engineered Explosives
* sideboard 1 - Swords to Plowshares 2 - Disenchant 1 - Devout Witness 2 - Kataki, War's Wage 1 - Plains 1 - Engineered Explosives 1 - Notion Thief 2 - Grafdigger's Cage 1 - Pithing Needle 3 - Containment Priest
The maindeck is 61 cards. I'm not sure what I want to cut. I also don't know about baby Jace vs. JTMS and Bob vs. Delve.
It's 61 cards
|
|
|
19
|
Eternal Formats / Blue-Based Control / Re: Painter
|
on: November 04, 2015, 02:52:52 am
|
Thanks for the writeup. I'm looking forward to trying Remora. I'm surprised that your sideboard doesn't have even more shops hate given how skewed the maindeck is towards fighting blue.
|
|
|
20
|
Eternal Formats / Eternal Article Discussion / Re: [Free Article] The Rise of Monastery Mentor
|
on: November 03, 2015, 11:56:21 am
|
I'll add to the positive feedback on this article (and on your articles in general). I appreciate that you present why something is good or why something changed rather than just telling us that things have changed and now X is good. I have felt a lot more comfortable playing Delver/Pyromancer rather than Mentor since Mentor was printed. The deck just flowed better and none of the various Mentor builds felt quite right. I haven't had the chance to play much Mentor since the DCI changes have come into effect but I have noticed that Mentor seems to be doing well. Thanks for explaining why.
|
|
|
21
|
Eternal Formats / Global Vintage Tournament Reports and Results / Re: Painting the Town Blue: MSPaint 2015
|
on: October 31, 2015, 09:07:29 am
|
for me it would be very interesting what your thoughts were why Thirst and Gush would not work together.
I also wondered this. It seemed like a lot of people were assuming that Thirst and Gush wouldn't work together and I wasn't really sure why. I'm new to the format and I chalked it up to another thing that I just didn't get and which would become obvious at some point. I do get that most recent Gush decks along the lines of Pyromancer/Delver tend to be land-light and only play on-color Moxen but it seems to me that Moxen actually work well with Gush as they let you Gush more often and still play spells. Thirst implies a deck with higher CMC spells but if Thirst is at or near the top end of your curve it still feels like it might be low enough to pair with Gush. But again, I don't have a lot of confidence in this estimation. And I see that Rich has been trimming copies of Gush from his list.
|
|
|
|