Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 8
|
|
1
|
Eternal Formats / Ritual-Based Combo / Re: Doomsday (the Ritual approach)
|
on: April 06, 2015, 09:02:55 pm
|
I'll just leave this IRC log here... Hola to my peps in #motl and #tmd for helping with this list. Including Jeek who is credited with the Beacon pile in 2004?
....
I think it was Billy Murano (SP? -The guy who made the hatching plans storm deck in standard) who gave the idea for the beacon kill to team Meandeck. Stephen Menendian has an article about it on Star City. I worked on Meandeck Doomsday with JP Meyer, and created the Beacon kill on my own. Menendian left me out of the article and I've had a bug up my ass about it ever since. 
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
Vintage Community Discussion / Non-Vintage / Blue/Black Aggro Control, losing some stuff to rotation, looking for suggestions
|
on: September 30, 2007, 09:39:09 pm
|
|
I've been playing this on and off for the past few months, it's been working decently, but I'm about to lose quite a bit of it to rotation.
// jeek's blue/black aggro.. BEFORE
// Mana 4 River of Tears 4 Terramorphic Expanse 4 Watery Grave 2 Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth 4 Swamp 4 Island
// Counter 4 Remand 4 Rune Snag SB: 4 Flashfreeze SB: 4 Trickbind
// Removal 4 Sudden Death 4 Last Gasp 4 Repeal SB: 4 Smallpox SB: 3 Big Game Hunter
// Draw 4 Shadowmage Infiltrator 4 Looter il-Kor 2 Dimir Cutpurse
// The Beats 4 Tombstalker 4 Withered Wretch
As far as I can tell, I'm losing Last Gasp, Remand, Watery Grave, Dimir Cutpurse, and Repeal. To replace Last Gasp, I'm moving Smallpox to the maindeck, Underground River replaces Watery Grave. Wipe Away replaces Repeal, and I'm thinking about trying Nihilith in the Cutpurse slot along with removing an Island and a Swamp to complete the set of Nihiliths. The deck basically runs all answers and the creatures act as reusable draw to find the redundant cards. I've also been contemplating Nameless Inversion as the Last Gasp replacement, but the Smallpox/Nihilith interaction seems strong.
Edit: Oh right, and Delay to replace Remand.
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
Vintage Community Discussion / Card Creation Forum / Martyr's Rallying Cry
|
on: May 21, 2007, 11:23:20 am
|
Martyr's Rallying Cry  Instant As an additional cost to play ~this~, sacrifice a creature. Creatures you control gain Bushido X, where X was the power of the sacrificed creature. Martyr's Cry  Instant As an additional cost to play ~this~, sacrifice a creature. Choose One - All blocked creatures get +X/+X until the end of turn, where X is the sacrificed creature's power; or All blocking creatures get +X/+X until the end of turn where X is the sacrificed creature's toughness. For Korlis!The name sucks, but I think the spell has potential.
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
Vintage Community Discussion / Card Creation Forum / Unstable Talisman
|
on: May 15, 2007, 05:02:10 pm
|
Unstable Talisman  Enchantment - Aura Enchant Creature Return Unstable Talisman to its owner's hand: Remove enchanted creature from the game, then return it to play under its owner's control. Unstable Talisman  Enchantment - Aura Enchant Creature Return Unstable Talisman to its owner's hand: Remove enchanted creature from the game, then return it to play under its owner's control.
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
Vintage Community Discussion / Card Creation Forum / Invalidate
|
on: April 23, 2007, 02:38:39 pm
|
Invalidate {W/U} {W/U} Instant Counter target spell that was not played from its controller's hand. Invalidate {W/U} Instant Counter target spell that was not played from its controller's hand. If was spent to play Invalidate, draw a card.
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
Vintage Community Discussion / Card Creation Forum / Re: Sliver Licid
|
on: April 23, 2007, 02:14:39 pm
|
That's a pity. It seems like a simple solution. And forgive my ignorance, but who is Lee Sharpe and what was his reasoning?
I'm a bit out of it at the moment, so my answer might not be exactly correct. Lee Sharpe is a Level 3 judge that is also involved in fixing up rules issues and templating issues in upcoming Magic sets. You'll see him mentioned in the FAQs for the last few sets. His reasoning was "This is something we don't do"
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
Vintage Community Discussion / Card Creation Forum / Re: Sliver Licid
|
on: April 19, 2007, 08:25:20 am
|
What about having:
All Slivers gain "T: This creature loses all other abilities and becomes an Aura enchantment with enchant creature. Attach it to target creature. You may pay 0 to end this effect. Enchanted creature is a Sliver. All other Slivers gain the printed abilities of enchanted creature"
I was told by Lee Sharpe that I can't use "printed".
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
Vintage Community Discussion / Card Creation Forum / Re: Sliver Licid
|
on: April 18, 2007, 02:09:27 pm
|
BrassMan: enchanted sliver guy is a sliver BrassMan: which means flanking sliver gives him flanking BrassMan: but since he has flanking do other slivers get it twice? The answer currently is "Yes". How do we fix this?
What are you trying to fix exactly? Look at Cavalry Master http://resources.wizards.com/Magic/Cards/TSP/en-us/Card108903.jpg"Other creatures you control with flanking have flanking. (Each instance of flanking triggers separately.)" Abilities on slivers stack and this suggests that they can also be stacked on on-slivers. The problem is that Sliver Licid gains flanking, so then it gives a second instance of flanking to all other slivers.
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
Vintage Community Discussion / Card Creation Forum / Sliver Licid
|
on: April 18, 2007, 01:11:10 pm
|
Original Text: Sliver Licid  Creature -- Sliver Licid All Slivers gain "T: Sliver Licid loses this ability and becomes an Aura enchantment with enchant creature. Attach it to target creature. You may pay 0 to end this effect. Enchanted creature is a Sliver. All other Slivers gain the abilities of enchanted creature." 2/2 Current Text: Sliver Licid  Creature -- Sliver Licid All Sliver creatures gain "T: This creature loses this ability and becomes a Sliver Aura tribal enchantment with enchant creature. Attach it to target nonsliver creature. You may pay 0 to end this effect." All Sliver permanents gain "Enchanted creature is a Sliver. Copy enchanted creature's text box onto all other Slivers." 2/2BrassMan: enchanted sliver guy is a sliver BrassMan: which means flanking sliver gives him flanking BrassMan: but since he has flanking do other slivers get it twice? The answer currently is "Yes". How do we fix this?---- jeek: Enchanted creature is a Sliver. Copy enchanted creature's text box onto all other Slivers. jeek: zomg I think I have it! LeeSharpe: That would probably wouldn't be a copy effect, it would probably be keyworded LeeSharpe: but that seems reasonableLeeSharpe: "Splice onto [quality]" on a permanent means "[quality] permanents have this permanent's rules text, except for any Splice abilitie, in addition to their own." LeeSharpe: or similar LeeSharpe: I would still keyword it, for the complication factor LeeSharpe: People will understand the keyword and reminder text, they won't understand the rules as written on the card LeeSharpe: much like Mindslaver, etc Thanks to LeeSharpe, BrassMan, and EliShffrn for helping me get the rules issues out of the way.
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
Vintage Community Discussion / Card Creation Forum / Re: Abandon the Flesh
|
on: April 12, 2007, 10:08:17 am
|
How does this differ functionally from Momentary Blink-type effects? I mean, you can't bounce the copy, but that's about all I can think of. Maybe that means it should be white.
Interesting that you mention that card, which has a blue flashback. I see it as a cross between Momentary Blink and Pongify.
|
|
|
|
|