Last Rites too

It creates a stronger interaction between Tolarian Academy and gush.

IO'm not a dredge player but based on recentprintings (hate and otherwise) tt seems like the future of dredge is to play more lands.

Could work with:

The triggered ability goes on the stack on top of the spell triggering it and will thus resolve first.  There's no way to get around the possibility of losing the flip trigger to instant speed removal. 

Maybe we should collectively agree to vote someone (or several someones) in to the super league who we believe can make a show of putting some underrepresented archetypes up on display.  On the other hand it would be really unfortunate if people felt forced to play something that has a decreased chance of winning just because of a promise to do so.  That might give someone the feelbads.  

100% on board.  Even the chat was endlessly complaining about the commentary.  Every one of those players does great commentary.  I think this is just a case of people complaining for the sake of it.  It can be really damaging to a format that you're trying to expose to a wider audience when there is a crowd of people booing just so they can get on board of the complain-train.

You could run it on a Virtual Machine. 
Is there a particular error message you get when trying to run it on Windows 10?

It seems like change for the sake of change.

Only for Madness

There is no advantage to be gained by playing coloured non-artifact spells that is not obsolesced by the advantage gained through using 4 copies of Mishra's Workshop and not playing those spells. 

Super neat indeed.
That's just a matter of perspective I suppose.  I'd expect Wizards' perspective on the matter to be that people buying chase standard cards to play Vintage is a very good thing for them.  Wizards' could completely bypass their promise to not print cards on their reserved list by publicly supporting players in creating proxies"play-test cards" (from the reserved list specifically) to play with their Eternal Masters singles that they pulled from packs fresh of the presses.  With reserved list cards being legal to proxy it would open the gates all the way to anyone wanting to play Vintage or Legacy.  It would have the same barrier to entry as modern at the very worst but more likely it would be much less expensive to buy into than modern currently is due to the size of the card pool and the potential for deck diversity.  Of course once mtgfinance clues in everything will get bought out but whatever.  I would honestly just laugh at people spending thousands to try to buy out cards that most of the Vintage community already have.  Buying out the vintage card pool would be quite a bit harder than buying out the modern card pool.  It's much bigger.  I suspect many speculators are about to have their bubble burst by the end of the year and be left with stacks of bulk and a sizable credit card bill if things continue as they have.  

I think this is a very interesting idea for all involved and could really take off.  I don't see any way that Wizard's could be sued for what players and TO's do at their own events and venues.  Worst case scenario is that Wizards has to release a statement to portray that they don't condone the use of proxies at supported events and venues (already happened) but there's no way that it can hurt Wizards' if people just go ahead and adopt this policy going forward.  The bad news is a bunch of prospectors dangling power in front of people to extort them for playing the game they love would be out some capitol that they risked but it's their own fault really.  They got greedy and players not being able to afford reserved list cards is the consequence.  Following that people will stop playing one way or the other and the bubble bursts.  Vintage staples have pretty well hit their ceiling at this point.  

I would say the vast majority of the reserved list has already been obsolesced in this way.  Almost every effect you can find on their has a strictly better equivalent that has been printed since.  The ones that haven't yet are the ones that are expensive.  There are a few that are simply not good enough to see play due to normal power creep not directly related to their uniqueness.  Things used to be more expensive to cast in general and so cards printed back then are often over costed and thus no longer strategically sound.  Most standard playables have built in black lotuses, comparatively speaking, by the cost standards of yesteryear.  Tarmogoyf was on of the most obvious example of this but there are lots of others.

It was foil and thus exempt at the time.  Same story to Negator.

This can easily produce more problems than solutions.  You can't print new cards that are superior to old ones without obsolescing the old ones.  If colourless matters got better than playing colours it would hurt the diversity of the format. 

Moore's law wants a word with you.

He kills jace, mentor, and most robots.

If it were an accident I think it would be fixed by now.  I think it's been removed intentionally by wizards for a reason. 

This has flying every turn not just when you cast leap.  It is also blue and exiles to force which I think is it's most relevant advantage to Swiftspear in vintage.  The comparison between this card and Swiftspear is similar to the comparison between Young Pyromancer and Monastery Mentor.  It costs one more mana but has significant advantages for doing so.  If the Swiftspear was your primary plan to begin with then you'd want to play 4 so that you're going to draw one early.  Playing 4 of this means you don't regret drawing the second copy when you'd rather have the blue card for force to defend the first one.  Also it is not dead if they have a blocker and dies to almost nothing at 2 mana in combat.  I think Monastery Swiftspear's big brother is vintage relevant.

There are a number of infinite combos with it of course.  It's an engine that is definitely going to make a plash in other formats.  Maybe the synergies found by those playing it in those formats will make their way into vintage. 

I remember people playing Mystic Remora as soon as it was released. 

This card could actually be playable in decks already running multiple copies of Restoration Angel could it not?  The card seems to be very good in general but I think blue angels or similar strategies are where this could be easily slotted in for testing.  Being repeatable seems great but it costs two more mana to just use it once.  

I agree that the bazaar reanimate route is excessive but actually having to cast Living End might be cumbersome in the early game.  With a bazaar you can discard it along with two goblins to cast it immediately off a Goblin Lackey trigger into Goblin Darkdwellers and get back the goblins you discarded.  Maybe there is something better than Bazaar of Baghadad at doing this in Goblins.  Bidding doesn't get around Grafdigger's Cage or Caintainment Priest but Living Death does and so does Living End because it was based on Living Death.  It's that standard season that makes me wonder if this could be a viable strategy.  An aggro goblins deck with 4 Mental Misstep and some hand disruption seems like it could be in a position to win some games, especially in a creature heavy meta.  

Here is a list of magical cards:
Ancestral Vision***
Time Walk*** (Exhaustion could also be decent)
Living End***
Hypergenesis**
Manamorphose**
Price of Progress**
Demonic Tutor*
Vindicate*
Hymn to Tourach*
Thoughtseize*
Yawgmoth's Will*
Inquisition of Kozilek
Smash to Smithereens
Abrupt Decay
Grim Discovery
Songs of the Damned
Seething Song
Wheel of Fortune
Swords to Plowshares
Red Elemental Blast
Culling the Weak
Cabal Ritual
Pyroblast
Maelstrom Pulse
Burning Wish
Lightning Bolt
Timetwister
Dark Ritual
Balance

Edit: Cropped out some of the obvious misses and added two of the most obvious hits with this new goblin.
Also, what if this card were used in black red goblins deck, similar to those of yesteryear, without heavy blue?  You could play Bazaar of Baghdad and Reanimate/Exhume in the event that you don't have a Goblin Lackey and/or Warren Instigator.  Reanimate can also help ensure one of those two stick.  The goal of the deck could be to hit an Ancestral Vision, Hypergenesis, or Living End off Goblin Darkdwellers depending on what is appropriate for the situation.  Assuming you're not facing Grafdigger's Cage or Containment Priest in game 1 you can side out this plan in game 2 and just run aggro all over their dead sideboard slots.  Side out the Goblin Darkdwellers against cage and the Goblin Lackeys and Warren Instigators against priest in favor of more ways to abuse Living End since it gets around both of those cards.  This guy could replace some of the other 5 drop goblins in the main deck.  The main issue I can see with this is that when you are running mostly goblins this will have less targets so it will have to be a careful balance of creatures and non creatures if Living End or Hypergenesis are the appropriate lines.  Alternatively you could just play 4 Ancestral Visions in your goblin deck and that might be enough to put you ahead with your 4/4 menace off Goblin Lackey et al.  Since it requires you to play more non-goblin spells it's in contention with Goblin Ringleader but maybe this card is just better.  Not to mention:

What if it played full solomoxcrypt and a deeper disruption package?  There is a cavern of souls now and I haven't seen anyone playing goblin since that came out.  Maybe I just missed the report though.

I think people would already be doing this if it were a good option.  4 mana is a lot to ask of a deck that usually has no hand and very few land.  My question was about how to get the Darkdwellers into play to cast living end from the graveyard. Living End gets around cage this guy does not.  It's all very tautological.  There is Life from the Loam and there are multiple lands that can put creatures back on top of the library whereas there are no cards to get sorceries back directly.  This guy could fit that role but witness can get sorceries back also and doesn't get locked out by cage.  You're still praying to get a green source plus one more though.  If by some miracle you've got three creatures in play already then Dread return on Keranos can kill Priest without needing mana if you've dredged your draw step and have a Bazaar still untapped during your main phase but I this card just can't do anything about cage even if it could be put into play somehow with cage down which is problematic at best.  So I guess If you have the power to kill a priest And you have made sure cage stays off the table Then this guy Could be useful but how is that any different then if you just don't have this guy?  Maybe because Living End puts so much into play in one turn when you've already missed your Narcomoeba triggers and need sac outlets for cabal therapy to trigger bridge?  

This card seems like it has potential and I would say it should be on the watch list for dredge players but I would be surprised if it is to be a game changer unless there's something I'm missing.

Edit: It's probably playable in Modern but I just can't figure how this could make a splash in Vintage.

The reason cascade works with living end is the same reason this guy does.  Cards without casting costs (such as land) have converted mana cost of zero which is less than three.

How do you get it into play in a dredge shell with the cage down?

I think it could also be really good in a lot of aggro builds.  Blue already has a lot of good draw that pretty thoroughly overshadows this but non-blue aggro seems like it would really benefit from having a continual source of card advantage from a land.  It's also easier to activate in those builds since they don't play workshop which can't pay the activation cost. 

This seems like it was designed to be played in modern living end hypergensis but it is interesting for dredge.  It might not hurt dredge to play living end as a one of. 
I don't really like it much for oath just because the casting cost limit is reduced to just 3 which limits you to mostly y-will.  Yawgmoth's Will is great and all but you're not really gaining much (3 mana) for what it is costing you in the cases where you draw this compared to witness and snap.  I guess it makes it easier for the oath player to defend the y-will for that extra 3 mana but the benefit of playing snap and witness is the cases where thy're in your hand and this guy's cc doesn't like to be drawn by your typical bug oath deck.