Mykeatog
|
 |
« on: September 02, 2004, 01:40:17 pm » |
|
After talking a little today with Mark Rosenwater he tells me that the format didn't recieve a new name cause they are waiting for the players to come up with one. This is something that we should consider since this is still a second format for our type of magic player. Which leads me into my next point...
Is the mana drain going to suport this format? Does it seem different enough from 1.5 that it warrents rethinking the ideas about not having a forum for it? We have 2 forums for random nUbz, and as far as I can tell some of them can post in the intelligent guy forum anyway-- why would we rather support those guys than a gift from wizards?
Just some things I am wondering- trying to still up debate.
I say go.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Free Agent
|
|
|
Zherbus
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: September 02, 2004, 01:44:04 pm » |
|
1) I already nuked the budget forum, leaving just 1 n00b forum.
2) TheSource folks already have a 1.5 community and I'd hate to step on any toes. I wouldn't be adverse to supporting the format but they won't be just satisfied with 1 forum from TMD. They want 'Extreme 1.5', '1.5 Primers', 'Open 1.5', etc. I feel THEY should pay for SOME domain name, and redirect to their current forums.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Founder, Admin of TheManaDrain.com
Team Meandeck: Because Noble Panther Decks Keeper
|
|
|
Jebus
Full Members
Basic User
  
Posts: 1216
Corn is no place for a mighty warrior!
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: September 02, 2004, 01:51:22 pm » |
|
If we add a forum for 1.5, then we have to add a forum for Extended, and Type 2, and Block and...
This is the Vintage (type 1) site. I don't see why it needs to cater to other formats that already have plenty of websites.
As far as the new name for 1.5, I vote for Extended 2: Electric Boogaloo!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
The Atog Lord
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: September 02, 2004, 01:55:45 pm » |
|
Renaming formats in the past has met with no great deal of success.
How many people call Type One "Vintage"? The official name change happened years ago, and WotC still mentions "Type One" in their announcements.
Does anyone actually call Type Two by its official name, "Standard"?
I vote for calling 1.5 "Type One Point Five."
|
|
|
Logged
|
The Academy: If I'm not dead, I have a Dragonlord Dromoka coming in 4 turns
|
|
|
Zherbus
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: September 02, 2004, 02:52:15 pm » |
|
Apparently they got a URL going up soon : mtgthesource.com
|
|
|
Logged
|
Founder, Admin of TheManaDrain.com
Team Meandeck: Because Noble Panther Decks Keeper
|
|
|
rvs
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: September 02, 2004, 03:33:16 pm » |
|
OVERextended!
|
|
|
Logged
|
I can break chairs, therefore I am greater than you.
Team ISP: And as a finishing touch, god created The Dutch!
|
|
|
DavidHernandez
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: September 02, 2004, 03:59:44 pm » |
|
It's hard to call Type 1 "Vintage" because if you play in a current 1.5 tournament, it counts towards your "Vintage" rating.
In the new world, I will probably call Type 1 "Vintage". It's kind of cool.
Dave.
|
|
|
Logged
|
I will find a way -- or make one. Check out my wife! www.DanceKitten.comTeam GRO- Ours are bigger than yours. Card Carrying Member: Team Mindtrick Best.Fortune.Cookie.Ever: "Among the lucky, you are the chosen one."
|
|
|
jpmeyer
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: September 02, 2004, 05:21:18 pm » |
|
STUFF THE NAME 1.5 BALLOT BOX!
|
|
|
Logged
|
Team Meandeck: "As much as I am a clueless, credit-stealing, cheating homo I do think we would do well to consider the current stage of the Vintage community." -Smmenen
|
|
|
Nameless
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: September 02, 2004, 08:02:09 pm » |
|
Vintage: Part Deux
|
|
|
Logged
|
"I weep for noone, and noone weeps for me."
"Anger cannot be dishonest." - Marcus Aurelius, 121-180 AD
(Brought to you by the Department of Redundancy Department.)
|
|
|
jpmeyer
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: September 02, 2004, 09:01:10 pm » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Team Meandeck: "As much as I am a clueless, credit-stealing, cheating homo I do think we would do well to consider the current stage of the Vintage community." -Smmenen
|
|
|
Jacob Orlove
Official Time Traveller of TMD
Administrator
Basic User
    
Posts: 8074
When am I?
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: September 02, 2004, 09:07:58 pm » |
|
Ric_Flair had a great suggestion: Open.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Team Meandeck: O Lord, Guard my tongue from evil and my lips from speaking guile. To those who slander me, let me give no heed. May my soul be humble and forgiving to all.
|
|
|
jpmeyer
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: September 02, 2004, 11:03:59 pm » |
|
The names of other formats are Vintage (sometimes called Type 1), Extended (Type 1.x), Standard (Type 2), Block, Open (online format), Classic (online format), Prismatic (online format), Singleton (online format), and Tribal Wars (online format). Also, makes sure to vote "Love it!" for you reponse to the new 1.5 
|
|
|
Logged
|
Team Meandeck: "As much as I am a clueless, credit-stealing, cheating homo I do think we would do well to consider the current stage of the Vintage community." -Smmenen
|
|
|
dandan
More Vintage than Adept
Full Members
Basic User
  
Posts: 1467
More Vintage than Adept
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: September 03, 2004, 04:17:09 am » |
|
Is there something wrong with calling it Type 1.5?
I might start calling Type I (Roman 1 as we are all old, out-of-date and resistant to change here in Type I land) Type I (Vintage) as a nod to Wizards recent efforts to be good to us. I'll even call it Vintage occasionally if they allow Portal cards (how's that for an offer Wizards?).
|
|
|
Logged
|
Playing bad cards since 1995
|
|
|
Dozer
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: September 03, 2004, 05:27:20 am » |
|
I like Vintage. It just sounds cooler than Type 1. I am all for giving the format names instead of numbers; Vintage, Extended, Standard, Block looks better than T1, T1.x, T2, BC, I think. As for the new "1.5", here is some random brainstorming for a name: - Retro (I've seen that mentioned somewhere - The Source, maybe?)
- Old
- Even Longer
- Veteran
- Classic (why the hell is this occupied by an ONLINE format?)
- Proto
- Venerable
- Museum
- History
- Past
- Neo-Vintage
- 1.5: Reloaded
- Extended: Revolutions
[/list:u] Probably the best way to find a name is to let random students/pupils make an association test. "Complete: Vintage - _________ - Extended - Standard - Block"
Dozer
|
|
|
Logged
|
a swashbuckling ninja Member of Team CAB, dozercat on MTGO MTG.com coverage reporter (Euro GPs) -- on hiatus, thanks to uni Associate Editor of www.planetmtg
|
|
|
Gabethebabe
Full Members
Basic User
  
Posts: 693
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: September 03, 2004, 05:53:57 am » |
|
Call the new format "Fixed"
"Vintage was broken, now it is Fixed"
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
LoA
Full Members
Basic User
  
Posts: 133
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: September 03, 2004, 08:19:57 am » |
|
Zeitgeist.
It'll never actually get approved, but I think it's a cool word and sums up the nature of the format nicely.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
SliverKing
|
 |
« Reply #16 on: September 03, 2004, 08:24:13 am » |
|
Ric_Flair had a great suggestion: Open. Open gets my vote. It really fits the rest of the format names perfectly Vintage - Open - Extended - Standard - Block
|
|
|
Logged
|
"SliverKing's liver taps for black mana" -Azhrei
|
|
|
jpmeyer
|
 |
« Reply #17 on: September 03, 2004, 08:46:51 am » |
|
"Open" is taken. Same with "Classic."
|
|
|
Logged
|
Team Meandeck: "As much as I am a clueless, credit-stealing, cheating homo I do think we would do well to consider the current stage of the Vintage community." -Smmenen
|
|
|
Bram
Adepts
Basic User
   
Posts: 3203
I've got mushroom clouds in my hands
|
 |
« Reply #18 on: September 03, 2004, 09:04:33 am » |
|
I like Vintage. It just sounds cooler than Type 1. Well, we've been calling ourselves Vintage for quite some time now, haven't we? TheManaDrain - Vintage Magic At Its Best. Just goes to show how much we rule. Of all suggestions so far, the only ones that make any amount of sense are 'retro' and 'classic'. 'Antique'? 'Seasoned'? 'Perennial'? 'Broad'? 'Scopic'? 'Comprehensive'? 'Universal'? 'Boundless'? 'Capacious'? 'Pervasive'? 'Intermediate'? 'Surrogate'? (just kidding ;-) 'Median'? 'Mezzo'? I'm prone to Comprehensive myself, as it has two meanings: 1. So large in scope or content as to include much: a comprehensive history of the revolution. 2. Marked by or showing extensive understanding: comprehensive knowledge. The first one obviously describes the former 1.5 (whereas the Comprehensive Rulebook refers to the second one). Obviously, the Comprehensive Rulebook would have to be renamed as well :-) Perennial (as in: Lasting or active through the year or through many years) would be my second choice I guess. Median ('Relating to, located in, or extending toward the middle') and Mezzo ('Mean; not extreme') would be a close call for my 3rd choice. Vintage - Comprehensive/Perennial/Median/Mezzo - Extended - Standard - Block [Edit] Seeing as how 'comprehensive' is probably too awkward with the rulebook, and Mezzo sounds more like a lounge bar, I'd probably pick either Perennial or Median. Out of those two, Median is easiest and describes the situation the best. Median would be my final pick.
|
|
|
Logged
|
<j_orlove> I am semi-religious <BR4M> I like that. which half of god do you believe in? <j_orlove> the half that tells me how to live my life <j_orlove> but not the half that tells me how others should live theirs
R.I.P. Rudy van Soest a.k.a. MoreFling
|
|
|
Nameless
|
 |
« Reply #19 on: September 03, 2004, 12:23:11 pm » |
|
Actually something more along the lines of 'Intermediate' sounds like a fitting title to me. I mean if we think of it in the bigger picture like Standard - Extended - Intermediate - Vintage then we get a better scope of where the format fits in. Especially when 1.X turns into 1.SUCK when the oldest set becomes Invasion Block.
While I know they will never do it, I think they've certainly re/printed enough non-Basic land hate to let the Dual Lands loose again, perhaps in the 3rd set of a new Block. If they timed this with the rotation of the fetch-lands then it wouldn't unbalance Standard at all. They could even reprint Wasteland to keep things honest. I'm just tired of boring formats where mono-colored decks can be dominant at all. But, that likely stems from my own M:tG philosophy that there are 5 colors, so decks shouldn't be sporting 1 or 2 of them. To this end I think 3-color decks would be back in style for a while, both in Standard and especially Extended. Of course it isn't very likely at all to happen, but it just popped into my head while I was posting, and I think it'd be quite fun.
|
|
|
Logged
|
"I weep for noone, and noone weeps for me."
"Anger cannot be dishonest." - Marcus Aurelius, 121-180 AD
(Brought to you by the Department of Redundancy Department.)
|
|
|
Methuselahn
Full Members
Basic User
  
Posts: 1051
|
 |
« Reply #20 on: September 05, 2004, 12:29:54 pm » |
|
Hmm.
Of things not mentioned yet, I may like "Epic Magic"
It's short enough in syllables, it sort of describes the grandiose nature of 1.5 although Epic tends to be an adjective for a narrative story.
*shrug*
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ric_Flair
|
 |
« Reply #21 on: September 05, 2004, 08:20:10 pm » |
|
Although I think Open would be the perfect name, I understand that it is taken. I hate Magic Online, btw. Another name I was thinking about was Unabridged, like the dictionary. Comprehensive sounds okay, but unabridged sounds cooler.
|
|
|
Logged
|
In order to be the MAN...WOOOO!....you have to beat the MAN....WOOOOO!
Co-founder of the movement to elect Zherbus to the next Magic Invitational. VOTE ZHERBUS!
Power Count: 4/9
|
|
|
Jhaggs
|
 |
« Reply #22 on: September 06, 2004, 03:14:38 am » |
|
I concur with the "Open" title. It really has a nice ring and it's catchy. Too bad that it might not be an option. As for other titles here are a few off the top of my head:
"Selected" "Budget" "Prime" "Representative" "Perennial" "Median" (been mentioned but catchy) "Emblem" "Definitive" "Kosher" "Vanilla" "Headline" "General" "Dutch" "Red-Headed Step Child"
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bram
Adepts
Basic User
   
Posts: 3203
I've got mushroom clouds in my hands
|
 |
« Reply #23 on: September 06, 2004, 03:20:58 am » |
|
Epic Decent. Unabridged Nice. Except, ofcourse, that it really isn't unabridged ('Containing the original content') at all. However Comprehensive, while problematic in terms of the Rulebook, fits the description of the format perfectly. "Perennial" I mentioned that one, too :-) "Dutch" Bwahahahaa! As in 'cool, but cheap' you mean? ;-)
|
|
|
Logged
|
<j_orlove> I am semi-religious <BR4M> I like that. which half of god do you believe in? <j_orlove> the half that tells me how to live my life <j_orlove> but not the half that tells me how others should live theirs
R.I.P. Rudy van Soest a.k.a. MoreFling
|
|
|
Jhaggs
|
 |
« Reply #24 on: September 06, 2004, 03:27:19 am » |
|
Bwahahahaa! As in 'cool, but cheap' you mean?  Dutch can mean many things  Somehow it's fitting though... [/quote]
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
dandan
More Vintage than Adept
Full Members
Basic User
  
Posts: 1467
More Vintage than Adept
|
 |
« Reply #25 on: September 06, 2004, 03:33:03 am » |
|
Calling it Dutch would make people think that Mountains are banned.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Playing bad cards since 1995
|
|
|
|