[Vintage Avant-Garde] Martello Shops Vs. RUG Delver

[forests failed you]

New article up on SCG:

http://www.starcitygames.com/magic/standard/24554-Vintage-Avant-Garde-Martello-Shops-vs-RUG-Delver.html

[Samite Healer]

So the major thing I noticed about how I would have probably played those games, is that I likely would have kept the opening 7 in Game 2.  Perhaps I need to question my mulligan skills.  I'd hate taking the risk of mulligan to 6 and getting a one-lander or something.  If you were on the play that game, would you have kept it with Sabotage up on turn 1?

[forests failed you]

Actually, yes I would have kept that hand on the play. 

[Thecheese]

Enjoyed it

[Asphyxious]

I thought this article was great, and I think this is a great way to dispel many of the myths surrounding vintage as well as show off some of the most ridiculous plays in magic, like this one.

http://www.themanadrain.com/index.php?topic=44209.0

[dangevin]

...I think this is a great way to dispel many of the myths surrounding vintage...

Agreed, considering that the win conditions of both decks involve turning creatures sideways, 100% of which are modern-legal!

Thanks for laying out images, but moreso, for giving insight into simple often-taken-for-granted actions like the thought process behind your FoW's, and the arrangement of the cards you replace to library after brainstorm.