Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2
|
|
3
|
Vintage Community Discussion / General Community Discussion / Re: Scammers and idiots
|
on: October 03, 2006, 10:23:46 pm
|
There seems to be a flood of bad fakes on eBay recently, even more than the usual crowd.
The only solution - buyer beware. Nothing else can save people. It is hard to get stuff taken down at times, so people really need to know what they are doing when spending any amount of money.
I'd love to be able to personally shut down every single scam, and warn every single buyer, but it just is not logistically possible with the large market place that is ebay, and the internet in general.
The sad reality.. Scammers seem to be everywhere around us. But on the Internet.. they do not just seem, they are.
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
Vintage Community Discussion / General Community Discussion / Re: [Discussion] Unrestrictions?
|
on: February 21, 2006, 08:11:50 pm
|
4 Librairies is just something impossible. That would be, by far, too much insane. Due to his cost, I don't think Regrowth should be unrestricted. 4 x Regrowth, 4 x Merchant Scroll, 1 x Ancestrall. And ya got too much ancestralls per game.  Add some "restricted l33t g00dies" around and regrowth become the 2+ x of every other brokeness. Unrestricting Grim monolith could lead to a new !COMBO! : Power Artifact, Voltaic Construct, Grim Monolith! Just kidding here but still, Grim is too much of an accelerator to let some decks run four of it. Voltaic Key? I don't really see the !DANGER! of it.. 4 x Voltaic, 4 x Timevault ( with the old wording of the card? ) Hehe I know it does not work. NO TIME COUNTER. But still, I try to find a !DANGER! for Voltaic key being unrestricted and I don't see any.
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
Vintage Community Discussion / General Community Discussion / Re: Mana Drain for stolen deck
|
on: February 09, 2006, 04:15:39 pm
|
As a judge, I can say that talking about DQs or DQ investigations is prohibited outside of the staff running an event, and they are quite strict about that. There was a post to the Judge mailing list from the Judge Manager in a thread that discussed a DQ that consisted of the following line: Welcome to level zero again for numerous violations of protocal, ethics, and procedure. The DCI investigates DQs to ensure that the DQ was a justified DQ, as well as other purposes. Rich is right in his concerns about how a list like this could very easily be used for vindictive purposes, rather than just as a list to aid TOs. I can't say that I could see very much good coming from it. Aa. Did not saw that side of the medal. You are right. 
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
Vintage Community Discussion / General Community Discussion / Re: Mana Drain for stolen deck
|
on: February 08, 2006, 03:37:27 pm
|
What Ray has just done is great, I'm happy for you and I hope we'ill one day find what is missing. They can then decide whether they want to admit them to their tournament, or at least be aware to keep an eye on them. Nothing like getting black-balled all over the world. The list could be periodically updated and names removed after a period of time deemed reasonable. I really like this idea. Maybe not in all local tournaments around the globe but in big events, it would be great to have that list.
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
Vintage Community Discussion / Card Creation Forum / Re: Roots of Decay
|
on: October 21, 2005, 03:37:52 pm
|
Then, let's change this to : Putrid Shackles  Enchant Creature During enchanted creature's controller upkeep, put a -1/-1 counter on enchanted creature. Enchanted creature cannot attack or block or use any activated ability. Whenever enchanted creature leaves play, return <CARDNAME> to its owners hand. Darn, can't get ride of those shackles!
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
Vintage Community Discussion / Card Creation Forum / Re: Roots of Decay
|
on: October 21, 2005, 11:50:53 am
|
Oups, forgot the Current Wording. Current Wording :  Enchant Creature
During enchanted creature's controller upkeep, put a -1/-1 counter on enchanted creature. Enchanted creature cannot attack or block or use any activated ability. If enchanted creature leaves play, return Roots of Decay to owner's hands.
Darn, can't get ride of those putrid roots..I removed the last ability but I suggest we keep the color choice, keeping the flavor of the card.
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
Vintage Community Discussion / Card Creation Forum / Roots of Decay
|
on: October 21, 2005, 12:17:50 am
|
 Enchant Creature During enchanted creature's controller upkeep, put a -1 -1 counter on enchanted creature. Enchanted creature cannot attack or block or use any activated ability. If enchanted creature leaves play, return Roots of Decay to owner's hands. If Roots of Decay goes to the graveyard, return Roots of Decay to owner's hands. Darn, can't get ride of those putrid roots..
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
Vintage Community Discussion / General Community Discussion / Re: Perche Italia
|
on: October 11, 2005, 02:58:08 pm
|
It's also possible that they just found a really good deal on translating the cards into Italian. Even with Magic's early success, Wizards was still a small company back then, so their actions may have been dictated as much by opportunity as by choice.
It was probably a matter of opportunism. In the early Magic, maybe it was the second biggest market outside of america? A Wizard employee will probably come post the answer HERE soon. Jking. 
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
Vintage Community Discussion / Card Creation Forum / Re: Will of the Forsakens
|
on: October 06, 2005, 06:13:37 pm
|
Fine with me for the sorcerie. Instant would be better but in the context of the card, I admit being a sorcery fits more. Will of the Forsakens  Sorcery As an additionnal cost, remove the top fifteen cards from your library from the game. Search your library for up to 2 cards and put them in your hand. Do what they always wanted to do, a long time ago...This card in a Death Wish/Jet Medaillon combo deck would fit perfectly!  , I don't think this card has its place in a two colors deck. I really want the card to be axed into the mono  decks. Keeping the flavor of the card. 
|
|
|
|
|