Fish and FCG spring to mind....
My point on the aggro was that in a permanent war that you arent winning portal isnt really doing you any good unless you have all the proper pieces out...the question is then "is portal really any good here unless its late game and you are already winning"
Something like fish or fcg can just play out a few threats before you get portal out and viable, and even once portal starts working its going to be enough a lot of times to get through lethal damage..if its a fast big creature that can kill you in less than 4 turns portal is bad....but hey...this is just from my experiences (which is probably more experience with possessed portal than anybody else with possibly the exception of the original creators...even then it would be pretty close)
The life from Fastbond SHOULD be irrelevant. A better argument is "this lock relies on two singletons."
Should....but not always the case...the second point is the most important though since you are relying on a "combo" of 2 1ofs and a 2of in the deck for it to actually work in your advantage...not to mention you need something that will kill the opponent already in play for portal to be effective...since you dont get to draw either and must rely only on what is already out there or in your hand....
Portal denies that priveledge of drawing cards ONLY if you can keep portal working for the rest of the relevant game...Im still really wanting to hear from juggernaught about his experiences with portal through the event...
It still seems like a "win more" card in this deck...and I still havnt heard any convincing arguments for keeping portal in over something like another titan or sphere of resistance #4 or anything else being used in stax that is missing from this deck (crucible #3 maybe)