TheManaDrain.com
September 06, 2025, 02:02:47 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Doomsday Gift in Vintage Article  (Read 2585 times)
covetousrat
Basic User
**
Posts: 107


View Profile
« on: June 07, 2015, 11:25:39 am »

Very interesting Doomsday and Gift ungiven article. Good read.

http://www.channelfireball.com/articles/doomsday-gifts-in-vintage/
Logged
desolutionist
Full Members
Basic User
***
Posts: 1130



View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: June 08, 2015, 12:26:15 pm »

So many cards that manipulate the library, but nothing to deal with a hate bear; even if you were to add 1-2 cards to the sideboard, it wouldnt come up on a consistent enough basis.  In my opinion this deck is only playable in a blue mirror, where casting spells that generate card advantage is more important.  Outside of that realm, this deck doesn't do much in the face of relevant opposition.
Logged

Join the Vintage League!
shrewarmies
Full Members
Basic User
***
Posts: 257


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #2 on: June 08, 2015, 10:51:27 pm »

And yet the author chose not to attend the countries largest Vintage event of the year the following day iirc his home town.
Logged
rikter
Basic User
**
Posts: 139


View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: June 16, 2015, 01:49:42 pm »

I got really excited upon seeing that article, but think the deck was a little lackluster. I mostly play shops but I built LSV's VSL Doomsday list just to play for fun...I can't recall many situations where I would actually have the mana to cast gifts and then go off the same turn, except if I have the gush/bond engine going, in which case I already have better ways to win the game.

Playing that list against shops seems like it would be absolutely miserable
Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.023 seconds with 16 queries.