TheManaDrain.com
September 06, 2025, 04:30:28 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Phyrexian canceler  (Read 6280 times)
Blue Lotus
Basic User
**
Posts: 389



View Profile
« on: April 05, 2011, 02:45:42 pm »

BBBB

Trample

Whenever a source deals damage to ~, that sources controller sacrifices that many permanents.

5/5

I'm sorry but this is just bananas. Maybe not for vintage but ZOMG
« Last Edit: April 06, 2011, 03:53:41 pm by Blue Lotus » Logged
meadbert
Adepts
Basic User
****
Posts: 1341


View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: April 05, 2011, 03:02:42 pm »

Is this better than Phyrexian Negator?  If so, how?
EDIT:
WOAH!!!
So they must sac permanents?  Okay that is better.
Logged

T1: Arsenal
ErtaiAdept
Adepts
Basic User
****
Posts: 836


cmasley1218
View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: April 05, 2011, 03:24:12 pm »

That is pretty ridiculous.  quad-black mana would be difficult to get in anything other than a ritual based deck in vintage, but it might be playable.  A 5/5 for 4 (even 4 on color) is good...and given that ability it becomes pretty amazing.
Logged

Bill Copes bought me a beer after using the power of his mind to remove all the Bazaars and Serum Powders from my deck in two consecutive games.

Team TMD
"Dice have six sides for a reason.  There is no excitement in surety my friend."
Royal Ass.
Basic User
**
Posts: 290


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: April 05, 2011, 03:28:52 pm »

Suicide black is back bitchessss!!!

... Ok, maybe not Wink
Logged
PETER FLUGZEUG
Full Members
Basic User
***
Posts: 275


New Ease


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #4 on: April 05, 2011, 05:15:38 pm »

well, it might still not be tier 1, but this card is insane for black. now it's not even suicide, but homicide black...
it rapes all other creature decks. it blocks a blightsteel colossus into the deck, while jökullhaupsing everything for your opponent. it is a 4 turn clock. New Phyrexia has had some insane cards already.
Logged

I will be playing four of these.  I'll worry about the deck later.
Blue Lotus
Basic User
**
Posts: 389



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: April 05, 2011, 11:13:28 pm »

Is this better than Phyrexian Negator?  If so, how?
EDIT:
WOAH!!!
So they must sac permanents?  Okay that is better.
My reaction exactly
Logged
Meddling Mike
Master of Divination
Administrator
Basic User
*****
Posts: 1616


Not Chris Pikula

micker01 Micker1985 micker1985
View Profile
« Reply #6 on: April 05, 2011, 11:31:42 pm »

The two closest vintage comparisons I can draw are Phyrexian Negator and Juzam Djinn. It's much harder to cast than Negator, but has the mirror effect of Negator's drawback and therefore is significantly better once cast.  It costs 4 like Juzam but the BBBB is more prohibitive than 2BB again rather than having a drawback it has a beneficial ability. If either of these cards were seeing play, I would say that this card might be a nice upgrade over them, but as it stands I'm not sure there's a place for this thing anywhere. Even in a format with Dark Ritual the BBBB is too prohibiitive. Pretty sure it'll never see vintage play.
Logged

Meddling Mike posts so loudly that nobody can get a post in edgewise.

Team TMD - If you feel that team secrecy is bad for Vintage put this in your signature
Sextiger
Basic User
**
Posts: 338


My nickname was born for these days

Sextiger187
View Profile
« Reply #7 on: April 06, 2011, 08:14:11 am »

G/B Aggro deck with Lotus Cobra, Urborg Tomb and this guy, book it, done. 
Logged

"After these years of arguing I've conceded that Merchant Scroll in particular can be an exception to this rule because it is a card that you NEVER want to see in multiples, under any circumstances. Merchant Scroll can be seen as restricted in a way because should you have 2 in a hand, only one is really useful (that is, only one can get Ancestral)."
TopSecret
Full Members
Basic User
***
Posts: 864


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: April 06, 2011, 10:25:39 am »

This thing pretty much says on it that Lodestone is a chump.
That seems like a big deal.
It's other ability is to slap around shit like Tinker for Inkwell and be generally unblockable.
More complicated than any of those, but I think that definitely makes it better than Negator in pretty much every deck.
However, the problem is that 4 mana for a 4 turn clock still isn't broken.
It's not balls ridiculous without dark ritual backing it up and it doesn't necessarily straight up answer anything.
But it is decent enough to see play in any version of mono black that ever comes up until a bigger beastie is printed.
I don't think that this will bring back Suicide, but it might make a viable version of it possible together with some of the other recent printings.
« Last Edit: April 06, 2011, 10:28:18 am by TopSecret » Logged

Ball and Chain
Mr. Type 4
Creator of Type 4
Full Members
Basic User
***
Posts: 814


Creator of Type 4 - Discoverer of Steve Menendian


View Profile WWW
« Reply #9 on: April 06, 2011, 11:06:47 am »

Quote
it blocks a blightsteel colossus into the deck, while jökullhaupsing everything for your opponent.
i'm pretty sure that infect means that the Canceler doesnt actually take damage and just dies instead. 
Logged

2008 VINTAGE CHAMPION
2013 NYSE OPEN I CHAMPION
Team Meandeck

Mastriano's the only person I know who can pick up chicks and win magic tournaments at the same time.
Delha
Full Members
Basic User
***
Posts: 1271



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: April 06, 2011, 11:21:12 am »

Quote
it blocks a blightsteel colossus into the deck, while jökullhaupsing everything for your opponent.
i'm pretty sure that infect means that the Canceler doesnt actually take damage and just dies instead.  
To the best of my knowledge, Infect/Wither damage is still damage, and triggers all the same stuff normal damage would.

Edit: Found some backup. From the Scars of Mirrodin FAQ...
Quote
* Damage from a source with infect is damage in all respects. If the source with infect also has lifelink, damage dealt by that source also causes its controller to gain that much life. Damage from a source with infect can be prevented or redirected. Abilities that trigger on damage being dealt will trigger if a source with infect deals damage, if appropriate.
« Last Edit: April 06, 2011, 11:27:39 am by Delha » Logged

I suppose it's mostly the thought that this format is just one big Mistake; and not even a very sophisticated one at that.
Much like humanity itself.
Daenyth
Adepts
Basic User
****
Posts: 432


shadowblack379
View Profile
« Reply #11 on: April 06, 2011, 11:27:04 am »

Quote
it blocks a blightsteel colossus into the deck, while jökullhaupsing everything for your opponent.
i'm pretty sure that infect means that the Canceler doesnt actually take damage and just dies instead. 
To the best of my knowledge, Infect/Wither damage is still damage, and triggers all the same stuff normal damage would.
This is correct. It still deals damage.
Logged

Team #olddrafts4you -- losing games since 2004
Shax
Basic User
**
Posts: 247


0TonyMontana0 =twittername add me!

Braveheart+Shax
View Profile Email
« Reply #12 on: April 06, 2011, 06:18:56 pm »

It will distort a Legacy metagame greatly. Give black decks a 'good' blocker and attacker. Here is my answer. Do people run cards like Tombstalker in Vintage? There is your answer. The sacrifice effect is clutch to breaking a MUD matchup though.
Logged

Jesus Christ the King of Kings!

Vintage Changes: Unrestricted Ponder

Straight OG Ballin' shuffle em up tool cause you lookin' like mashed potatoes from my Tatergoyf. Hater whats a smurf? You lucksack? I OG. You make plays? I own deez. You win Tourneys? I buy locks. You double down? I triple up. Trojan Man? Latex. ClubGangster? I own it.Sexy mop? Wii U. Shax 4 President?
-Hypnotoa
patat
Basic User
**
Posts: 16



View Profile
« Reply #13 on: April 07, 2011, 04:09:42 am »

Ya, infect is a replacement effect on the damage dealt. Everything still triggers.

But holy $h!& that's a fantastic printing. Mono black just got a ton better.
Logged
Neonico
Basic User
**
Posts: 374


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: April 07, 2011, 05:14:56 am »

It would be a great card for any monoB deck if blightsteel colossus wasn't the tinker target of choice.
Logged
Mantis
Full Members
Basic User
***
Posts: 564


Guus de Waard - Team R&D

guus_waard@hotmail.com
View Profile Email
« Reply #15 on: April 07, 2011, 08:29:05 am »

It would be a great card for any monoB deck if blightsteel colossus wasn't the tinker target of choice.
Reading = #winning

Also, time to pick up a playset of Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth maybe?
Logged
Wagner
Basic User
**
Posts: 820


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: April 07, 2011, 03:30:03 pm »

It would be a great card for any monoB deck if blightsteel colossus wasn't the tinker target of choice.

It is decent against Blightsteel and can be a way to keep it at bay.

Hilarious if Colossus is forced to block Smile
Logged
the zeeker
Basic User
**
Posts: 18


View Profile Email
« Reply #17 on: April 07, 2011, 03:47:15 pm »

Nettling imp is back baby!!
Logged
LordHomerCat
Full Members
Basic User
***
Posts: 1397

Lord+Homer+Cat
View Profile
« Reply #18 on: April 07, 2011, 03:48:10 pm »

How does the new trample rule work?  I know in the past, BSC would deal 5 to a blocker then the other 6 to the player.  Is that still the case?  If so, I just have to get 5 lands/permanents in play and then BSC runs over this dude no problem.
Logged

Team Meandeck

Team Serious

Quote from: spider
LordHomerCat is just mean, and isnt really justifying his statements very well, is he?
Diakonov
Full Members
Basic User
***
Posts: 758


Hey Now


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: April 07, 2011, 06:45:17 pm »

How does the new trample rule work?  I know in the past, BSC would deal 5 to a blocker then the other 6 to the player.  Is that still the case?  If so, I just have to get 5 lands/permanents in play and then BSC runs over this dude no problem.

Yes, this is still the case.  Just hope that they don't edict you after you swing =O
Logged

VINTAGE CONSOLES
VINTAGE MAGIC
VINTAGE JACKETS

Team Hadley

Worldslayer
Basic User
**
Posts: 104


MobeusCrest
View Profile
« Reply #20 on: April 07, 2011, 08:22:33 pm »

Given that the biggest restriction of running this guy is that he requires BBBB, almost necessitating a monoblack manabase and/or Dark Rituals, and that otherwise he is a standout beatstick in a LOT of situations, is this playable in Dark Times?
Logged

Why does the bunny have pancakes on its head?
serracollector
Basic User
**
Posts: 1359

serracollector@hotmail.com
View Profile Email
« Reply #21 on: April 08, 2011, 02:16:16 am »

Just a silly question but with Dual Lands, and Urborgs, wouldn't he be a wrecking house in a red splash deck?  Bolt or Chain Lightning Him and you opponent sacs 3?  Grim Lavamancer for 2 perms a turn.  Or stay mono black and bring back cursed scroll.  Drop your hand with Rituals and Discard, then start hitting him for 3 mana, and 2 damage from Scroll.  3 mana lock?  Just my thoughts on how to use him.

My mistake to all, sorry next time I will read the card.  My mistake.
« Last Edit: April 08, 2011, 03:29:22 pm by serracollector » Logged

B/R discussions are not allowed outside of Vintage Issues, and that includes signatures.
Tobi
Tournament Organizers
Basic User
**
Posts: 898


Combo-Sau


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: April 08, 2011, 02:51:40 am »

Just a silly question but with Dual Lands, and Urborgs, wouldn't he be a wrecking house in a red splash deck?  Bolt or Chain Lightning Him and you opponent sacs 3?  Grim Lavamancer for 2 perms a turn.  Or stay mono black and bring back cursed scroll.  Drop your hand with Rituals and Discard, then start hitting him for 3 mana, and 2 damage from Scroll.  3 mana lock?  Just my thoughts on how to use him.

I guess not.
Quote
Whenever a source deals damage to ~, that sources controller sacrifices that many permanents.
Logged

2b || !2b
Delha
Full Members
Basic User
***
Posts: 1271



View Profile
« Reply #23 on: April 08, 2011, 11:20:46 am »

Just a silly question but with Dual Lands, and Urborgs, wouldn't he be a wrecking house in a red splash deck?  Bolt or Chain Lightning Him and you opponent sacs 3?  Grim Lavamancer for 2 perms a turn.  Or stay mono black and bring back cursed scroll.  Drop your hand with Rituals and Discard, then start hitting him for 3 mana, and 2 damage from Scroll.  3 mana lock?  Just my thoughts on how to use him.
You consistently amaze me with how bad your grasp of this game is.

Comments like this are inappropriate flames. Please try to be more respectful to your fellow TMD members in the future. There are much more polite ways to point out factual errors than this.

Rich
« Last Edit: April 08, 2011, 02:40:58 pm by The Atog Lord » Logged

I suppose it's mostly the thought that this format is just one big Mistake; and not even a very sophisticated one at that.
Much like humanity itself.
Lemnear
Basic User
**
Posts: 330



View Profile
« Reply #24 on: April 08, 2011, 12:06:24 pm »

@serra:

A mysterious, fairly unknown and advanced tech; developed over more than a decade of playing magic the gathering; a legacy, protected by the honored ancestors  ....  now unveiled in this very forum: Read ... the ... card!

XD
« Last Edit: April 08, 2011, 12:35:16 pm by Lemnear » Logged

Member of Team RS (Germany)
nineisnoone
Full Members
Basic User
***
Posts: 902


The Laughing Magician


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: April 08, 2011, 08:16:55 pm »

oh my god, i love low tier sui-black decks.

that said, I don't see it being that high impact.  I know in some ritual combo decks that they'd have a SB creature as a back up plan, and that seems like a good fit. realistically speaking you can't make it do stupid things, unless the opponent really wants it to.

but, ya know, i love it all the same.
Logged

I laugh a great deal because I like to laugh, but everything I say is deadly serious.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.316 seconds with 21 queries.