Show Posts
|
Pages: [1] 2
|
5
|
Eternal Formats / Northeast U.S. / Re: The 2015 Eternal Weekend! $20,000+ in prizes! Philadelphia, PA! August 21-23!
|
on: July 19, 2015, 01:08:50 pm
|
It would be really cool to have just one section designated for EDH, cube, '93/'94, etc. A lot of people play EDH but it's difficult to find who does or has time to play at any given moment in large events.
What if we had one long table that was reserved specifically for these other formats? Just a large sign at a table would suffice--no need to even have someone coordinating side events. That way in between rounds or if people drop out they could go to this table and find others willing to spend time playing EDH or something.
Thoughts?
|
|
|
10
|
Vintage Community Discussion / General Community Discussion / Re: Vintage Super League: Who Would You Like to See?
|
on: April 02, 2015, 11:56:53 am
|
Tom came to mind for me as well for someone that's a Vintage generalist. Also, my perspective is that Tom is a talker (I mean this in a good way) and his commentary would be a nice addition to VSL. During tournaments he's always open to me with his deck list and reasoning behind choices. Personally, I think Reid Duke is the best fit if it works with his schedule. He has recent IRL Vintage success and is a well known MtGO personality. Plus, he is super informative when approached and thus I believe he would also add great commentary, which is something I think the VSL just lost with the departure of Dave. Reid would be a really smart choice for VSL. They would benefit from someone that is proven across many formats and still knows Vintage. Also, Reid had the cojones to run TPS in the shops-infested North East during Champs. He's also a nice guy. ... 3. Caleb Durward This is probably a bit off-the-wall, but he is a fairly high profile player of other formats and would attract an audience I think. And as cool as it has been to see the Pros stick their necks out with some fairly spicy deck choices, I think having a noted brewer involved would be a lot of fun. Didn't work out for Josh Utter Leyton alas, but who knows what we'd see out of Caleb. Would certainly be interesting. ...
I like this choice a lot since Brian Kelly doesn't have the "star power" they're looking for. It's sometimes boring to watch some of the VSL competitors rotate archetypes amongst themselves (Delver, Belcher, Merfolk). I'd love to see someone abuse the vast card selection of the format.
|
|
|
13
|
Vintage Community Discussion / General Community Discussion / Re: Vintage Super League: Who Would You Like to See?
|
on: March 18, 2015, 04:33:32 pm
|
1) Mark Tocco. -World Champ -Proven record with a variety of archetypes -Has successfully done commentary before (in Legacy) -He's a local to my area, so I'm partial -Everyone likes tacos
2) Any of the major tournament organizers (Calvin Hodges, Nick Coss, etc. ) -I feel that TO's/dealers are just as important as the players to keep Vintage thriving
3) Reid Duke -Has many accolades as a Magic player -As with most people on VSL, he's a versatile player when it comes to archetypes -He could attract more people to Vintage
Honorable mention: Brian Kelly because he is a successful brewer. However, I feel that VSL looks for players with bigger stats (e.g. hall of famers or a lot of pro points). Also, players aren't on the mic when they duel so we wouldn't hear Brian maniacally laughing when he's casting something ridiculous.
|
|
|
14
|
Vintage Community Discussion / General Community Discussion / Vintage Super League: Who Would You Like to See?
|
on: March 18, 2015, 10:03:32 am
|
Disclaimer: This is just for fun and is no way meant to impact the VSL. I've been seeing a lot of sweet decks in VSL that have been pioneered by a lot of people in TMD community. I think this showcases just how versatile Vintage can be to the many viewers that are unfamiliar with the format. I personally enjoy brewing more than anything, so I'd love to see some of our brewers invited to the League. Everyone enjoys different aspects of Magic more than others, so...  Who are three (3) players that you would like to see invited to VSL and why? (Cannot list yourself)
|
|
|
16
|
Eternal Formats / Bazaar-Based Decks / Re: [Deck Discussion] Fatestitcher Dredge
|
on: March 16, 2015, 10:36:03 pm
|
Very impressive finish, Matt. Darkblast was my dredge-able answer to containment priest. someone else was running sudden shock to answer priest which I think is worse since it has to be found by not dredging. You can usually clear the hand of missteps thanks to therapy then blast dredge blast off the two sources to kill a priest. Maybe swords to plowshares or even journey to nowhere is decent since I keep bridges I've already dredged. Depending on their clock, you can hardcast thugs to generate tokens and/or get back narcos. I don't think priest is what kills this deck.
This is really good input. I was on UWR Landstill and my dredge hate was 3 Grafdigger's Cage and 3 Containment Priest (and I'd probably side in an Ingot Chewer). I don't really test against Dredge but you've made me reconsider graveyard sweepers.
|
|
|
27
|
Eternal Formats / Northeast U.S. / Re: Blue Bell Game Day #1 - 12-20-14 - WE'RE BACK!
|
on: December 08, 2014, 06:15:17 pm
|
This is gonna be my first paper vintage event. What is the policy for proxies? I was thinking about picking up nice ones online that are printed on over normal magic cards. Would that be good or if not what are you looking for?
I am not speaking on behalf of the TO, but I do see the following guidelines quite often for other tournaments (p.s. welcome to vintage!): Please do not use the back of a magic card for a proxie! There are two types of acceptable proxies. The first and most basic is taking a basic land card and writing the details of the card on it. The second method is to take a card that shares some of the characteristics with the card that is being proxied and erase any characteristics that do not match, replacing them with the correct characteristics. All proxies must have the following text neatly printed, using a extra fine point sharpie. Ball point pens may not be used: • The full name of the card (no abbreviations or nicknames) • Correct casting cost of the card including all colored mana symbols • All relevant/game effecting text When choosing what card to use as the base for an erased proxy players must follow these rules: • The mana cost of the base spell must be the same as the card being proxied. • The type of the card being proxied must be the same as the base card. • The P/T of a creature being proxied must be the same as the base creature P/T • When proxying a creature it may be difficult to find a creature where all characteristics match. In this case, mana cost is the most important, followed by the P/T, followed by the subtype. Any characteristics that do not match must be erased and corrected. • The art box, card name, and text box must be totally erased. White out may not be used for this as it affects the stiffness of the card and may mark it. • When adding text to the card do not use a ball point pen. A extra fine point sharpie is the best thing to use. A ball point pen can cause indentations on the card marking it. • For clarity reasons, the use of cards with the new card frame is strongly encouraged
|
|
|
|